A31 Skills2u – using ward-based toolkit training to address frequently identified technical skills performance errors during <i>in situ</i> simulation

Debbie Suggitt, David Baxter, Jeanette Baxter, Matthew Sharman, Jodie Murdoch, Aoife Colgan
{"title":"A31 Skills2u – using ward-based toolkit training to address frequently identified technical skills performance errors during &lt;i&gt;in situ&lt;/i&gt; simulation","authors":"Debbie Suggitt, David Baxter, Jeanette Baxter, Matthew Sharman, Jodie Murdoch, Aoife Colgan","doi":"10.54531/eods9506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Delayed airway management was identified in 70% (9 of 13) of Insitu simulation (ISS) with an average time of 3.42 minutes from identification of the problem to management. The resuscitation council UK suggest that in most patients presenting with a compromised airway, simple actions are sufficient to stabilize them, failing to do so increases the risk of hypoxia and multi-organ failure [1]. To address this trust wide training was initiated through the ‘skills2u’ programme, where toolbox teaching was taken to the wards. Across a two-week period, a multiprofessional team comprising of the simulation faculty, anaesthetists, and advanced clinical practitioners, visited all clinical areas and delivered a short 10–15-minute practical ward-based interactive session to the interprofessional team. The session covered airway assessment, airway opening manoeuvres and opportunity to practice inserting basic airway adjuncts. 412 clinical staff, of all grades and disciplines, were taught in basic airway management of the deteriorating and arrested patient. Evaluation of the teaching revealed 95.5% of staff agreed it was relevant to their role and 98% agreed they now felt better prepared to respond to changes in a patient’s condition. In the subsequent three months, technical skills performance errors for airway management were identified in 15% of 10 ISS completed. In these simulations the average time taken to manage the airway from identification of the problem reduced to 1.39 minutes. Using ISS to identify technical skills performance errors followed by a trust wide ward-based education programme is an effective way to enhance patient safety. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"2004 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/eods9506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delayed airway management was identified in 70% (9 of 13) of Insitu simulation (ISS) with an average time of 3.42 minutes from identification of the problem to management. The resuscitation council UK suggest that in most patients presenting with a compromised airway, simple actions are sufficient to stabilize them, failing to do so increases the risk of hypoxia and multi-organ failure [1]. To address this trust wide training was initiated through the ‘skills2u’ programme, where toolbox teaching was taken to the wards. Across a two-week period, a multiprofessional team comprising of the simulation faculty, anaesthetists, and advanced clinical practitioners, visited all clinical areas and delivered a short 10–15-minute practical ward-based interactive session to the interprofessional team. The session covered airway assessment, airway opening manoeuvres and opportunity to practice inserting basic airway adjuncts. 412 clinical staff, of all grades and disciplines, were taught in basic airway management of the deteriorating and arrested patient. Evaluation of the teaching revealed 95.5% of staff agreed it was relevant to their role and 98% agreed they now felt better prepared to respond to changes in a patient’s condition. In the subsequent three months, technical skills performance errors for airway management were identified in 15% of 10 ISS completed. In these simulations the average time taken to manage the airway from identification of the problem reduced to 1.39 minutes. Using ISS to identify technical skills performance errors followed by a trust wide ward-based education programme is an effective way to enhance patient safety. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
A31 Skills2u -使用基于病房的工具包培训来解决在情境</i>中经常发现的技术技能表现错误;模拟
在原位模拟(ISS)中,70%(13例中有9例)的患者发现了延迟气道管理,从发现问题到管理的平均时间为3.42分钟。英国复苏委员会建议,对于大多数出现气道受损的患者,简单的动作就足以使其稳定下来,否则会增加缺氧和多器官衰竭的风险[1]。为了解决这一问题,通过“skills2u”项目开展了广泛的培训,将工具箱教学带到病房。在为期两周的时间里,由模拟教员、麻醉师和高级临床从业人员组成的多专业团队访问了所有临床领域,并为跨专业团队提供了10 - 15分钟的实用病房互动课程。会议内容包括气道评估,气道开放操作和练习插入基本气道辅助工具的机会。412名各年级、各学科的临床工作人员学习了病情恶化和骤停患者的基本气道管理。对教学的评估显示,95.5%的员工认为这与他们的角色相关,98%的人认为他们现在感觉更好地准备应对病人病情的变化。在随后的三个月里,在完成的10例ISS中,有15%的气道管理技术技能表现错误。在这些模拟中,从识别问题到管理气道所需的平均时间减少到1.39分钟。使用ISS识别技术技能表现错误,然后进行广泛信任的病房教育计划是提高患者安全的有效方法。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信