Reinforcement Learning vs. Computational Intelligence: Comparing Service Management Approaches for the Cloud Continuum

IF 2.8 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Future Internet Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.3390/fi15110359
Filippo Poltronieri, Cesare Stefanelli, Mauro Tortonesi, Mattia Zaccarini
{"title":"Reinforcement Learning vs. Computational Intelligence: Comparing Service Management Approaches for the Cloud Continuum","authors":"Filippo Poltronieri, Cesare Stefanelli, Mauro Tortonesi, Mattia Zaccarini","doi":"10.3390/fi15110359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern computing environments, thanks to the advent of enabling technologies such as Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC), effectively represent a Cloud Continuum, a capillary network of computing resources that extend from the Edge of the network to the Cloud, which enables a dynamic and adaptive service fabric. Efficiently coordinating resource allocation, exploitation, and management in the Cloud Continuum represents quite a challenge, which has stimulated researchers to investigate innovative solutions based on smart techniques such as Reinforcement Learning and Computational Intelligence. In this paper, we make a comparison of different optimization algorithms and a first investigation of how they can perform in this kind of scenario. Specifically, this comparison included the Deep Q-Network, Proximal Policy Optimization, Genetic Algorithms, Particle Swarm Optimization, Quantum-inspired Particle Swarm Optimization, Multi-Swarm Particle Optimization, and the Grey-Wolf Optimizer. We demonstrate how all approaches can solve the service management problem with similar performance—with a different sample efficiency—if a high number of samples can be evaluated for training and optimization. Finally, we show that, if the scenario conditions change, Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-based approaches can exploit the experience built during training to adapt service allocation according to the modified conditions.","PeriodicalId":37982,"journal":{"name":"Future Internet","volume":"2001 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern computing environments, thanks to the advent of enabling technologies such as Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC), effectively represent a Cloud Continuum, a capillary network of computing resources that extend from the Edge of the network to the Cloud, which enables a dynamic and adaptive service fabric. Efficiently coordinating resource allocation, exploitation, and management in the Cloud Continuum represents quite a challenge, which has stimulated researchers to investigate innovative solutions based on smart techniques such as Reinforcement Learning and Computational Intelligence. In this paper, we make a comparison of different optimization algorithms and a first investigation of how they can perform in this kind of scenario. Specifically, this comparison included the Deep Q-Network, Proximal Policy Optimization, Genetic Algorithms, Particle Swarm Optimization, Quantum-inspired Particle Swarm Optimization, Multi-Swarm Particle Optimization, and the Grey-Wolf Optimizer. We demonstrate how all approaches can solve the service management problem with similar performance—with a different sample efficiency—if a high number of samples can be evaluated for training and optimization. Finally, we show that, if the scenario conditions change, Deep-Reinforcement-Learning-based approaches can exploit the experience built during training to adapt service allocation according to the modified conditions.
强化学习与计算智能:比较云连续体的服务管理方法
由于多访问边缘计算(MEC)等使能技术的出现,现代计算环境有效地代表了云连续体,这是一个从网络边缘延伸到云的计算资源的毛细管网络,它实现了动态和自适应的服务结构。在云连续体中有效地协调资源分配、开发和管理是一个相当大的挑战,这刺激了研究人员研究基于智能技术(如强化学习和计算智能)的创新解决方案。在本文中,我们对不同的优化算法进行了比较,并对它们在这种情况下的表现进行了初步研究。具体来说,这种比较包括Deep Q-Network, Proximal Policy Optimization,遗传算法,粒子群优化,量子启发粒子群优化,多群粒子优化和灰狼优化器。我们演示了所有方法如何以相似的性能(不同的样本效率)解决服务管理问题——如果可以评估大量样本以进行训练和优化。最后,我们表明,如果场景条件发生变化,基于深度强化学习的方法可以利用训练期间建立的经验来根据修改后的条件调整服务分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Future Internet
Future Internet Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
303
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Internet is a scholarly open access journal which provides an advanced forum for science and research concerned with evolution of Internet technologies and related smart systems for “Net-Living” development. The general reference subject is therefore the evolution towards the future internet ecosystem, which is feeding a continuous, intensive, artificial transformation of the lived environment, for a widespread and significant improvement of well-being in all spheres of human life (private, public, professional). Included topics are: • advanced communications network infrastructures • evolution of internet basic services • internet of things • netted peripheral sensors • industrial internet • centralized and distributed data centers • embedded computing • cloud computing • software defined network functions and network virtualization • cloud-let and fog-computing • big data, open data and analytical tools • cyber-physical systems • network and distributed operating systems • web services • semantic structures and related software tools • artificial and augmented intelligence • augmented reality • system interoperability and flexible service composition • smart mission-critical system architectures • smart terminals and applications • pro-sumer tools for application design and development • cyber security compliance • privacy compliance • reliability compliance • dependability compliance • accountability compliance • trust compliance • technical quality of basic services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信