Directly Integrating Health Information Exchange (HIE) Data with the Electronic Health Record Increases HIE Use by Emergency Department Clinicians

ACI open Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1772583
Rebecca L. Rivera, Heidi Hosler, Jeong Hoon Jang, Jason T. Schaffer, John Price, Joshua R. Vest, Titus K. Schleyer
{"title":"Directly Integrating Health Information Exchange (HIE) Data with the Electronic Health Record Increases HIE Use by Emergency Department Clinicians","authors":"Rebecca L. Rivera, Heidi Hosler, Jeong Hoon Jang, Jason T. Schaffer, John Price, Joshua R. Vest, Titus K. Schleyer","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1772583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives This article (1) develops a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources app, Health Dart, that integrates information from Indiana's community health information exchange (HIE), the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), directly with Cerner, an electronic health record (EHR), and (2) evaluates the effect of Health Dart's implementation on HIE use. Methods Health Dart was implemented in 14 Indiana University Health emergency departments (EDs) using a stepped-wedge study design. We analyzed rates of INPC use in 286,175 ED encounters between October 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Logistic regression was used to model the probability of INPC use given the implementation context, such as user interface (UI) enhancements and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Results INPC use increased by 131% across all encounters (from 3.6 to 8.3%; p < 0.001) after Health Dart implementation. INPC use increased by 144% (from 3.6 to 8.8%; p < 0.001) more than 2 months postimplementation. After UI enhancements, postimplementation INPC use increased by 123% (from 3.5 to 7.8%) compared to 181% (from 3.6 to 10.1%; p < 0.001) in postimplementation encounters that occurred before UI enhancements. During the pandemic, postimplementation INPC use increased by 135% (from 3.4 to 8.0%; p < 0.001) compared to 178% (from 3.6 to 10%; p < 0.001) in postimplementation encounters that occurred before the pandemic. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05). Conclusion Direct integration of HIE information into an EHR substantially increased frequency of HIE use, but the effect was weakened by the UI enhancements and pandemic. HIE information integrated into EHRs in the form of problem-oriented dashboards can potentially make information retrieval more efficient and effective for clinicians.","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This article (1) develops a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources app, Health Dart, that integrates information from Indiana's community health information exchange (HIE), the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC), directly with Cerner, an electronic health record (EHR), and (2) evaluates the effect of Health Dart's implementation on HIE use. Methods Health Dart was implemented in 14 Indiana University Health emergency departments (EDs) using a stepped-wedge study design. We analyzed rates of INPC use in 286,175 ED encounters between October 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Logistic regression was used to model the probability of INPC use given the implementation context, such as user interface (UI) enhancements and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Results INPC use increased by 131% across all encounters (from 3.6 to 8.3%; p < 0.001) after Health Dart implementation. INPC use increased by 144% (from 3.6 to 8.8%; p < 0.001) more than 2 months postimplementation. After UI enhancements, postimplementation INPC use increased by 123% (from 3.5 to 7.8%) compared to 181% (from 3.6 to 10.1%; p < 0.001) in postimplementation encounters that occurred before UI enhancements. During the pandemic, postimplementation INPC use increased by 135% (from 3.4 to 8.0%; p < 0.001) compared to 178% (from 3.6 to 10%; p < 0.001) in postimplementation encounters that occurred before the pandemic. Statistical significance was determined using 95% confidence intervals (α = 0.05). Conclusion Direct integration of HIE information into an EHR substantially increased frequency of HIE use, but the effect was weakened by the UI enhancements and pandemic. HIE information integrated into EHRs in the form of problem-oriented dashboards can potentially make information retrieval more efficient and effective for clinicians.
直接将健康信息交换(HIE)数据与电子健康记录集成,增加了急诊科临床医生对HIE的使用
本文(1)开发了一个快速医疗互操作性资源应用程序Health Dart,该应用程序集成了来自印第安纳州社区卫生信息交换(HIE)、印第安纳州患者护理网络(INPC)和电子健康记录(EHR) Cerner的信息;(2)评估了Health Dart对HIE使用的实施效果。方法采用楔形研究设计,在印第安纳大学14个急诊科实施Health Dart。我们分析了2019年10月1日至2020年12月31日期间286175例急诊患者的INPC使用率。考虑到用户界面(UI)增强和2019年冠状病毒病大流行等实施背景,使用逻辑回归对INPC使用的概率进行了建模。结果:在所有接触中,INPC使用率增加了131%(从3.6%增加到8.3%;p & lt;0.001)。INPC使用量增加了144%(从3.6%增至8.8%;p & lt;0.001) 2个月以上。在用户界面增强后,实施后INPC的使用率增加了123%(从3.5%增加到7.8%),而181%(从3.6%增加到10.1%;p & lt;0.001),发生在UI增强之前的改进后遭遇。在大流行期间,实施后的国家预防犯罪方案使用率增加了135%(从3.4%增至8.0%;p & lt;0.001)与178%相比(从3.6%到10%;p & lt;0.001),发生在大流行之前的实施后遭遇。采用95%置信区间(α = 0.05)确定差异有统计学意义。结论将HIE信息直接整合到电子病历中,可以显著提高HIE的使用频率,但由于UI的增强和流行病的影响,效果被削弱。HIE信息以面向问题的仪表板的形式集成到电子病历中,可能使临床医生的信息检索更加高效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信