A Typology of Fact-Checking Resources

Angeliki Monnier, Julie Dandois, Agnieszka Filipczyk, Eirini Konstanta, Anna Losa-Jonczyk, Costas Mourlas
{"title":"A Typology of Fact-Checking Resources","authors":"Angeliki Monnier, Julie Dandois, Agnieszka Filipczyk, Eirini Konstanta, Anna Losa-Jonczyk, Costas Mourlas","doi":"10.4000/questionsdecommunication.31530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article maps fact-checking resources and establishes a typology of the latter, depicting the variety of available tools. The approach is bottom-up: in the frame of a European project on collaborative fact-checking, students in journalism and communication studies coming from France, Greece and Poland were asked to list and classify all fact-checking resources that they use or they are aware of. Findings revealed a common denominator, i.e., the existence of a variety of understandings of this expression, which this study has mapped. However, it also shed light to differences linked to the role of national contexts.","PeriodicalId":285779,"journal":{"name":"Questions de communication","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Questions de communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.31530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article maps fact-checking resources and establishes a typology of the latter, depicting the variety of available tools. The approach is bottom-up: in the frame of a European project on collaborative fact-checking, students in journalism and communication studies coming from France, Greece and Poland were asked to list and classify all fact-checking resources that they use or they are aware of. Findings revealed a common denominator, i.e., the existence of a variety of understandings of this expression, which this study has mapped. However, it also shed light to differences linked to the role of national contexts.
事实核查资源的类型
本文映射了事实检查资源,并建立了后者的类型,描述了各种可用工具。这种方法是自下而上的:在一个欧洲合作事实核查项目的框架下,来自法国、希腊和波兰的新闻学和传播学专业的学生被要求列出并分类他们使用或知道的所有事实核查资源。研究结果揭示了一个共同点,即存在对这种表达的各种理解,这是本研究所描绘的。然而,它也揭示了与国家背景的作用有关的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信