Risk field assessment of longwall working face by the double-sided roof cutting along the gob

Dongyin Li , Pengkun Chen , Jinzhao Liu , Shen Wang , Huawei Xu
{"title":"Risk field assessment of longwall working face by the double-sided roof cutting along the gob","authors":"Dongyin Li ,&nbsp;Pengkun Chen ,&nbsp;Jinzhao Liu ,&nbsp;Shen Wang ,&nbsp;Huawei Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ghm.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In order to study the mechanism of the dual side roof cutting technology on the composite disaster of gas and coal spontaneous combustion in goaf, a model for the evolution of porosity and permeability in the dual side roof cutting working face was constructed. The location of the occurrence of the compound disaster of gas explosion and coal spontaneous combustion under the double-sided roof cutting mode was studied, and the sensitivity of the evolution pattern of the compound disaster area to the amount of air supply and gas gush was summarized. The results indicate that the top cutting pressure relief technology significantly reduces the permeability of porous media, and the sensitivity of the goaf on the intake side to airflow disturbances is significantly reduced. As the volume of air supply increases, the distance between the gas explosion risk area and the coal spontaneous combustion risk area gradually decreases, and the probability of composite disaster areas is 0. The increase of air supply and gas emission makes the gas concentration in the middle and deep goaf increase in an exponential function, and the width of the gas explosion risk area increases gradually. When the outflow reaches 40 ​m<sup>3</sup>/min, there is no composite disaster zone, indicating that the rapid increase in outflow inhibits the occurrence of composite disasters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100580,"journal":{"name":"Geohazard Mechanics","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 277-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294974182300047X/pdfft?md5=d86aaf955f72ffb9679d779774e44741&pid=1-s2.0-S294974182300047X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohazard Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294974182300047X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to study the mechanism of the dual side roof cutting technology on the composite disaster of gas and coal spontaneous combustion in goaf, a model for the evolution of porosity and permeability in the dual side roof cutting working face was constructed. The location of the occurrence of the compound disaster of gas explosion and coal spontaneous combustion under the double-sided roof cutting mode was studied, and the sensitivity of the evolution pattern of the compound disaster area to the amount of air supply and gas gush was summarized. The results indicate that the top cutting pressure relief technology significantly reduces the permeability of porous media, and the sensitivity of the goaf on the intake side to airflow disturbances is significantly reduced. As the volume of air supply increases, the distance between the gas explosion risk area and the coal spontaneous combustion risk area gradually decreases, and the probability of composite disaster areas is 0. The increase of air supply and gas emission makes the gas concentration in the middle and deep goaf increase in an exponential function, and the width of the gas explosion risk area increases gradually. When the outflow reaches 40 ​m3/min, there is no composite disaster zone, indicating that the rapid increase in outflow inhibits the occurrence of composite disasters.

双面顶板沿山坡切割长壁工作面的风险现场评估
为研究双侧顶板切割技术对煤层瓦斯煤自燃复合灾害的影响机理,构建了双侧顶板切割工作面孔隙率和透气性演化模型。研究了双侧顶板切割模式下瓦斯爆炸与煤炭自燃复合灾害的发生位置,总结了复合灾害区域演化规律对供风和瓦斯涌出量的敏感性。结果表明,顶板切割卸压技术显著降低了多孔介质的渗透性,进风侧煤层对气流扰动的敏感性明显降低。随着供风量的增加,瓦斯爆炸危险区与煤炭自燃危险区的距离逐渐减小,复合灾区的概率为 0,供风量和瓦斯排放量的增加使中深部煤层的瓦斯浓度呈指数函数增长,瓦斯爆炸危险区的宽度逐渐增大。当排风量达到 40 m3/min 时,不存在复合灾害区,说明排风量的快速增加抑制了复合灾害的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信