Remote auditing and its impacts on auditors’ work and work-life balance: auditors’ perceptions and implications

IF 2.4 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Johan Ingemar Lorentzon, Lazarus Elad Fotoh, Tatenda Mugwira
{"title":"Remote auditing and its impacts on auditors’ work and work-life balance: auditors’ perceptions and implications","authors":"Johan Ingemar Lorentzon, Lazarus Elad Fotoh, Tatenda Mugwira","doi":"10.1108/arj-06-2023-0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to explore the impacts of remote auditing on auditors’ work and work-life balance. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopted a qualitative online survey approach using open-ended reflections from 98 highly experienced auditors. The survey design aligns with a “Big Q” approach to qualitative data. The reflections were interpreted through the theoretical lens of the social presence theory. Findings Auditors underscore that remote auditing has improved their work-life balance since it offers flexibility, greater autonomy and efficient use of time. However, they believe less social contact due to remote auditing can hurt their work. Research limitations/implications This study aimed to holistically comprehend the concept of work-life balance in a remote auditing setting. Therefore, the study refrained from making comparisons based on demographic information (e.g. gender, experience and type of audit firm). Practical implications The findings highlight the need for adopting flexible work arrangements that prioritise auditors’ well-being. This is critical for making the audit profession attractive and enhancing overall audit quality. Updated regulatory guidance and controls are needed concerning the use of technologies in remote auditing to ensure high-quality audits. Social implications The findings of this study can positively reshape public perception of the audit profession. Firstly, enhanced work-life balance can improve audit quality. Secondly, incorporating emerging technologies in auditing can result in society perceiving auditors as adaptive to innovation and technological advancement that has been touted for their potential for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of audit and audit quality, potentially enhancing societal trust in auditing. Originality/value The findings of this study complement the auditing literature that has mainly focused on the traditional work paradigm, requiring in-person presence. The authors identify potential challenges emanating from auditors’ remote work and propose solutions for audit firms to improve work-life balance in a remote work setting.","PeriodicalId":45591,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Research Journal","volume":"64 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/arj-06-2023-0158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the impacts of remote auditing on auditors’ work and work-life balance. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopted a qualitative online survey approach using open-ended reflections from 98 highly experienced auditors. The survey design aligns with a “Big Q” approach to qualitative data. The reflections were interpreted through the theoretical lens of the social presence theory. Findings Auditors underscore that remote auditing has improved their work-life balance since it offers flexibility, greater autonomy and efficient use of time. However, they believe less social contact due to remote auditing can hurt their work. Research limitations/implications This study aimed to holistically comprehend the concept of work-life balance in a remote auditing setting. Therefore, the study refrained from making comparisons based on demographic information (e.g. gender, experience and type of audit firm). Practical implications The findings highlight the need for adopting flexible work arrangements that prioritise auditors’ well-being. This is critical for making the audit profession attractive and enhancing overall audit quality. Updated regulatory guidance and controls are needed concerning the use of technologies in remote auditing to ensure high-quality audits. Social implications The findings of this study can positively reshape public perception of the audit profession. Firstly, enhanced work-life balance can improve audit quality. Secondly, incorporating emerging technologies in auditing can result in society perceiving auditors as adaptive to innovation and technological advancement that has been touted for their potential for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of audit and audit quality, potentially enhancing societal trust in auditing. Originality/value The findings of this study complement the auditing literature that has mainly focused on the traditional work paradigm, requiring in-person presence. The authors identify potential challenges emanating from auditors’ remote work and propose solutions for audit firms to improve work-life balance in a remote work setting.
远程审计及其对审核员工作和工作生活平衡的影响:审核员的看法和含义
目的探讨远程审计对审计人员工作和工作生活平衡的影响。设计/方法/方法本文采用定性在线调查方法,使用98名经验丰富的审计员的开放式反思。调查设计与定性数据的“大Q”方法一致。这些反思是通过社会在场理论的理论视角来解释的。审计人员强调,远程审计改善了他们的工作与生活平衡,因为它提供了灵活性、更大的自主权和更有效的时间利用。然而,他们认为远程审计导致的社交接触减少会影响他们的工作。研究局限/启示本研究旨在全面理解远程审计环境下工作与生活平衡的概念。因此,这项研究没有根据人口资料(例如性别、经验和审计公司类型)进行比较。研究结果强调需要采用灵活的工作安排,优先考虑审计人员的福祉。这对于提高审计职业的吸引力和提高整体审计质量至关重要。需要更新有关远程审计技术使用的监管指导和控制,以确保高质量的审计。本研究的结果可以积极地重塑公众对审计职业的看法。首先,提高工作与生活的平衡可以提高审计质量。其次,将新兴技术纳入审计可以使社会认为审计师适应创新和技术进步,这些创新和技术进步被吹捧为提高审计效率和有效性以及审计质量的潜力,从而潜在地增强社会对审计的信任。独创性/价值本研究的发现补充了审计文献,这些文献主要关注传统的工作范式,需要亲自在场。作者确定了审计人员远程工作带来的潜在挑战,并为审计公司提出了解决方案,以改善远程工作环境下的工作与生活平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounting Research Journal
Accounting Research Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信