Comparative study between Dexmedetomidine, magnesium sulfate and propofol in controlled hypotensive anesthesia during endoscopic sinus surgery

Elhasab Abdelkader Elgnaidy, Sameh Refaat Elshehdawy, Magdy Elsayed Elbably, Abdelraheem Mustafa Dowidar, Abdelaziz Hamed Elbadawy
{"title":"Comparative study between Dexmedetomidine, magnesium sulfate and propofol in controlled hypotensive anesthesia during endoscopic sinus surgery","authors":"Elhasab Abdelkader Elgnaidy, Sameh Refaat Elshehdawy, Magdy Elsayed Elbably, Abdelraheem Mustafa Dowidar, Abdelaziz Hamed Elbadawy","doi":"10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i3b.424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of controlled hypotension has been shown to enhance the operational field visibility and reduce many surgical factors such as total blood loss, surgery duration and the occurrence of ecchymosis and postoperative edema. The objective of this research was to assess and evaluate the effectiveness of propofol, magnesium sulfate, and Dexmedetomidine in inducing controlled hypotensive anesthesia for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS).Methods: The use of controlled the current research had a prospective randomized double-blind design and included a sample of sixty individuals aged between twenty-one and fifty years, including both genders. The participants were having FESS. The participants were classified into three distinct groups. In the first group, participants were administered Dexmedetomidine intravenously at a loading dosage of 0.5 micrograms per kilogram, followed by a maintenance dose ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 mcg/kg/hour. The second group got an intravenous dose of forty mcgkg of magnesium sulfate, with a maintenance dose ranging from ten to fifteen mcg/kg/hour. Lastly, the third group received an intravenous dose of two hundred mg per twenty ml of propofol, with a maintenance dose ranging from two to four mcg/kg/hour. These administrations were carried out continuously during the surgical procedure.Results: The research observed a substantial decline in the visibility and bleeding score within group one compared to group two. However, there was no important variance in the visibility and bleeding score between group one and group three. Additionally, the research found a significant elevate in the visibility and bleeding score within group two compared to group three. The bradycardia incidence and the need for atropine were higher in patients receiving propofol and Dexmedetomidine. There was no bradycardia or atropine needed with group two. Side effects as nausea, shivering, and vomiting were less with propofol and Dexmedetomidine than with group two.Conclusions: The efficacy of Dexmedetomidine is better than MgSO4 and propofol and for controlled hypotension during FESS.","PeriodicalId":14146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i3b.424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of controlled hypotension has been shown to enhance the operational field visibility and reduce many surgical factors such as total blood loss, surgery duration and the occurrence of ecchymosis and postoperative edema. The objective of this research was to assess and evaluate the effectiveness of propofol, magnesium sulfate, and Dexmedetomidine in inducing controlled hypotensive anesthesia for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS).Methods: The use of controlled the current research had a prospective randomized double-blind design and included a sample of sixty individuals aged between twenty-one and fifty years, including both genders. The participants were having FESS. The participants were classified into three distinct groups. In the first group, participants were administered Dexmedetomidine intravenously at a loading dosage of 0.5 micrograms per kilogram, followed by a maintenance dose ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 mcg/kg/hour. The second group got an intravenous dose of forty mcgkg of magnesium sulfate, with a maintenance dose ranging from ten to fifteen mcg/kg/hour. Lastly, the third group received an intravenous dose of two hundred mg per twenty ml of propofol, with a maintenance dose ranging from two to four mcg/kg/hour. These administrations were carried out continuously during the surgical procedure.Results: The research observed a substantial decline in the visibility and bleeding score within group one compared to group two. However, there was no important variance in the visibility and bleeding score between group one and group three. Additionally, the research found a significant elevate in the visibility and bleeding score within group two compared to group three. The bradycardia incidence and the need for atropine were higher in patients receiving propofol and Dexmedetomidine. There was no bradycardia or atropine needed with group two. Side effects as nausea, shivering, and vomiting were less with propofol and Dexmedetomidine than with group two.Conclusions: The efficacy of Dexmedetomidine is better than MgSO4 and propofol and for controlled hypotension during FESS.
右美托咪定、硫酸镁和异丙酚在内镜鼻窦手术中控制降压麻醉的比较研究
背景:控制性降压已被证明可以提高手术视野的可见度,减少许多手术因素,如总失血量、手术时间、瘀斑和术后水肿的发生。本研究的目的是评估异丙酚、硫酸镁和右美托咪定在功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)中诱导控制低血压麻醉的有效性。方法:本研究采用前瞻性随机双盲设计,纳入60例年龄在21 ~ 50岁之间的男性和女性。参与者有FESS。参与者被分为三个不同的组。在第一组中,参与者静脉注射右美托咪定,负荷剂量为每公斤0.5微克,随后维持剂量为0.2至0.4微克/公斤/小时。第二组患者静脉注射40微克硫酸镁,维持剂量为10至15微克/千克/小时。最后,第三组接受静脉注射剂量为每20毫升异丙酚200毫克,维持剂量为2至4微克/公斤/小时。这些给药在手术过程中持续进行。结果:研究发现,与第二组相比,第一组的能见度和出血评分明显下降。然而,第一组和第三组在可视性和出血评分上没有显著差异。此外,研究发现,与第三组相比,第二组的能见度和出血评分显著提高。接受异丙酚和右美托咪定治疗的患者心动过缓的发生率和阿托品的需要量较高。第二组不需要心动过缓或阿托品。异丙酚和右美托咪定的副作用如恶心、颤抖和呕吐比第二组少。结论:右美托咪定在FESS中控制低血压的效果优于MgSO4和异丙酚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信