THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC IDEAS

Kevin Lawler, Tetyana Vlasova, Iryna Pavlenko, Alfredo Moscardini
{"title":"THE DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMIC IDEAS","authors":"Kevin Lawler, Tetyana Vlasova, Iryna Pavlenko, Alfredo Moscardini","doi":"10.17721/1728-2667.2023/222-1/12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The underlying hypothesis in this paper is that there are two fundamental views of the world in which Economists operate: the participatory and the observational. A consequence of these different views is in the extent to which the world can be understood and controlled. Economics was created in a period where the scientific (observational) view was in the ascendant and has benefitted and suffered because of it. The paper examines Economic thinking in this context and illustrates by apposite examples that although there has been a move by Economists to move from a rigorous mathematical straitjacket, not enough has been done. The paper suggests that the future of Economics depends on maintaining a continuous and necessary interchange between the two views. The basic premise underlying this paper is that we experience a physical presence- we are 'embodied minds.' This creates a worldview (the Soft Systems Methodology uses the word 'weltanschauung ') that is subjective and experiential.","PeriodicalId":30924,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kiivs''kogo Nacional''nogo Universitetu imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Ekonomika","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kiivs''kogo Nacional''nogo Universitetu imeni Tarasa Sevcenka Ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2023/222-1/12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The underlying hypothesis in this paper is that there are two fundamental views of the world in which Economists operate: the participatory and the observational. A consequence of these different views is in the extent to which the world can be understood and controlled. Economics was created in a period where the scientific (observational) view was in the ascendant and has benefitted and suffered because of it. The paper examines Economic thinking in this context and illustrates by apposite examples that although there has been a move by Economists to move from a rigorous mathematical straitjacket, not enough has been done. The paper suggests that the future of Economics depends on maintaining a continuous and necessary interchange between the two views. The basic premise underlying this paper is that we experience a physical presence- we are 'embodied minds.' This creates a worldview (the Soft Systems Methodology uses the word 'weltanschauung ') that is subjective and experiential.
经济思想的发展
本文的基本假设是,对于经济学家所处的世界,存在两种基本观点:参与式观点和观察式观点。这些不同观点的一个后果是世界在多大程度上可以被理解和控制。经济学是在科学(观察)观点方兴未艾的时期创立的,并因此而受益或受损。本文考察了在这种背景下的经济学思维,并通过恰当的例子说明,尽管经济学家已经从严格的数学束缚中解脱出来,但做得还不够。本文认为,经济学的未来取决于两种观点之间保持持续和必要的交流。这篇论文的基本前提是,我们体验到一种物理存在——我们是“具身心灵”。这创造了一种主观和经验的世界观(软系统方法论使用“weltanschauung”这个词)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信