Impact of using standard and high-resolution exposure modalities of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system for dental implants dimension measurements

Hossein Taheri, Mojdeh Mehdizadeh, Parvaneh Rostamzadeh
{"title":"Impact of using standard and high-resolution exposure modalities of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) system for dental implants dimension measurements","authors":"Hossein Taheri, Mojdeh Mehdizadeh, Parvaneh Rostamzadeh","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_386_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to analyze the effects of standard and high-resolution exposures on the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the evaluation of dental implant dimensions.Materials and Methods: A descriptive–analytical study was carried out on 40 dry human mandibles with appropriate ridge quality based on panoramic radiography. CBCT (Soredex, Cranex 3D, Finland) with a large field of view (FOV) and CMOS flat panel detector were used. CBCT with standard and a high resolution was performed in each mandible. Axial images, reconstructed by OnDemand 3D software, were processed to prepare cross-sectional images from the areas marked by gutta-percha, and then measured by a ruler with an accuracy of 0.01 millimeter in the computer. Measurements were recorded by two observers and the obtained data were compared with the real ones.Results: The results showed suitable repeatability in radiologic measurements (r = 0.971), which is indicative of the high reliability of intraobserver measurement. The measurement of width with high-resolution exposure indicated a significant difference with the real condition (P < 0.001); however, this difference was not significant in the case of standard resolution (P > 0.05). Measurement of height with high resolution showed a significant difference with the real condition in the right mandible (P = 0.04) and left mandible (P = 0.05); however, this difference was not significant in standard resolution (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Based on our findings, the standard CBCT resolution modality is suggested for dental implant images due to its higher accuracy than high-resolution methods for diagnosing the implant dimensions.","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"282 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_386_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze the effects of standard and high-resolution exposures on the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT in the evaluation of dental implant dimensions.Materials and Methods: A descriptive–analytical study was carried out on 40 dry human mandibles with appropriate ridge quality based on panoramic radiography. CBCT (Soredex, Cranex 3D, Finland) with a large field of view (FOV) and CMOS flat panel detector were used. CBCT with standard and a high resolution was performed in each mandible. Axial images, reconstructed by OnDemand 3D software, were processed to prepare cross-sectional images from the areas marked by gutta-percha, and then measured by a ruler with an accuracy of 0.01 millimeter in the computer. Measurements were recorded by two observers and the obtained data were compared with the real ones.Results: The results showed suitable repeatability in radiologic measurements (r = 0.971), which is indicative of the high reliability of intraobserver measurement. The measurement of width with high-resolution exposure indicated a significant difference with the real condition (P < 0.001); however, this difference was not significant in the case of standard resolution (P > 0.05). Measurement of height with high resolution showed a significant difference with the real condition in the right mandible (P = 0.04) and left mandible (P = 0.05); however, this difference was not significant in standard resolution (P > 0.05).Conclusion: Based on our findings, the standard CBCT resolution modality is suggested for dental implant images due to its higher accuracy than high-resolution methods for diagnosing the implant dimensions.
使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)系统的标准和高分辨率暴露模式对种植体尺寸测量的影响
背景:本研究旨在分析标准曝光和高分辨率曝光对CBCT评估种植体尺寸诊断准确性的影响。材料与方法:对40例具有适当脊型质量的干性下颌骨进行全景x线摄影的描述性分析研究。采用CBCT (Soredex, Cranex 3D, Finland)大视场(FOV)和CMOS平板探测器。在每个下颌骨进行标准和高分辨率的CBCT。轴向图像由OnDemand 3D软件重建,由杜仲胶标记的区域处理成截面图像,然后在计算机中用精度为0.01毫米的直尺测量。测量结果由两名观测者记录,并与实际数据进行比较。结果:放射学测量结果重复性良好(r = 0.971),显示了观察者内测量的高可靠性。高分辨率曝光测量的宽度与真实情况有显著差异(P < 0.001);但在标准分辨率下,差异不显著(P > 0.05)。高分辨率测量的右下颌骨高度与真实情况差异有统计学意义(P = 0.04),左下颌骨高度与真实情况差异有统计学意义(P = 0.05);但在标准分辨率上差异不显著(P > 0.05)。结论:基于我们的研究结果,推荐使用标准CBCT分辨率模式诊断种植体尺寸,因为它比高分辨率方法诊断种植体尺寸的准确性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信