Max R. Piana, Nicholas Pevzner, Richard A. Hallett
{"title":"Beyond the axe: Interdisciplinary approaches towards an urban silviculture","authors":"Max R. Piana, Nicholas Pevzner, Richard A. Hallett","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2259653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractForests in cities, from remnant woodlands to designed natural areas, are common and abundant. Ecologically similar to rural forests, these landscapes lend themselves to the principles of traditional forest management, such as silviculture. But the application of silviculture to forests in cities, at least in the United States, has long been met with resistance: as far back as Olmsted’s Central Park experiments with ‘planting thick and thinning quick’, public sentiment has been protective of trees, even when forest health would have benefitted from such treatments. Urban silviculture is a conceptual framework and a renewed call for a systematic approach to managing forests in cities that addresses cities’ socioecological context through adapted practices that integrate other disciplines, including design. Using emerging science and case studies, we explore how silviculture and landscape architecture, two allied yet often-alienated disciplines, can engage to create socially responsive evidence-based approaches that enhance the design, management and resilience of forested landscapes in cities.Keyword: forests in citiesurban silvicultureadaptive managementlandscape architectureecological designurban afforestation AcknowledgmentsWe thank the organizers of the Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms, and Global Warming conference at KU Leuven, as well as Morgan Grove and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US Government determination or policy.The work of Max R. Piana and Richard A. Hallett was authored as part of their official duties as Employees of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 USC. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under US Law. Nicholas Pevzner hereby waives their right to assert copyright, but not their right to be named as co-author in the article.Notes1 Roxi Thoren, ‘Deep Roots: Foundations of Forestry in American Landscape Architecture’, Scenario Journal (Spring 2014), scenariojournal.com/article/deep-roots/.2 Frederick L. Olmsted correspondence to Henry G. Stebbins, 1 February 1876, in: Charles E. Beveridge et al. (eds.), The Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted, Vol. VII: Parks, Politics, and Patronage, 1874–1882 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), 175–176.3 Frederick L. Olmsted and Jonathan Baxter Harrison, Observations on the Treatment of Public Plantations, More Especially Relating to the Use of the Axe (Boston: T.R. Marvin & Son, 1889).4 Charles Spague Sargent, ‘Mr. Vanderbilt’s Forest’, Garden and Forest 8 (21 February 1894), 71.5 Max R. Piana, Clara C. Pregitzer and Richard A. Hallett, ‘Advancing Management of Urban Forested Natural Areas: Toward an Urban Silviculture?’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 19/9 (2021), 526–535.6 Cecil C. Konijnendijk et al., ‘Defining Urban Forestry: A Comparative Perspective of North America and Europe’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4/3-4 (2006), 93–103.7 Piana, Pregitzer and Hallett, ‘Advancing Management’, op. cit. (note 5).8 Peter Harnik, Charlie McCabe and Alexandra Hiple, 2017 City Park Facts (San Francisco: The Trust For Public Land, 2017), tpl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CityParkFacts_2017.4_7_17.FIN_.LO_.pdf.9 Teresa Mexia et al., ‘Ecosystem Services: Urban Parks under a Magnifying Glass’, Environmental Research 160 (2018), 469–478.10 Clara C. Pregitzer et al., ‘Estimating Carbon Storage in Urban Forests of New York City’, Urban Ecosystems 25 (2022), 617–631.11 Christopher A. Lepczyk et al., ‘Biodiversity in the City: Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation’, BioScience 67/9 (2017), 799–807.12 D. S. Novem Auyeung et al., ‘Reading the Landscape: Citywide Social Assessment of New York City Parks and Natural Areas in 2013–2014’, Social Assessment White Paper No. 2 (New York: New York Department of Parks and Recreation, 2016), 1–69.13 Alexander J. Felson, Emily E. Oldfield and Mark A. Bradford, ‘Involving Ecologists in Shaping Large-Scale Green Infrastructure Projects’, BioScience 63/11 (2013), 882–890.14 The importance of long-term and sustained management of forests in cities is highlighted in recent urban ecology studies, for example: Brady L. Simmons et al., ‘Long-Term Outcomes of Forest Restoration in an Urban Park’, Restoration Ecology 24/1 (2016), 109–118; and Lea R. Johnson and Steven N. Handel, ‘Management Intensity Steers the Long-Term Fate of Ecological Restoration in Urban Woodlands’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 41 (2019), 85–92.15 Mark S. Ashton and Matthew J. Kelty, The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018).16 Piana, Pregitzer and Hallett, ‘Advancing Management’, op. cit. (note 5).17 Ibid.18 For a review of the multiple social and ecological factors that influence urban ecosystems, see: Steward T.A. Pickett et al., ‘Urban Ecological Systems: Scientific Foundations and a Decade of Progress’, Journal of Environmental Management 92/3 (2011), 331–362; and Lea R. Johnson et al., ‘Conceptualizing Social-Ecological Drivers of Change in Urban Forest Patches’, Urban Ecosystems 24 (2021), 633–648.19 Chadwick Dearing Oliver and Bruce A. Larson, Forest Stand Dynamics (Formerly published by John Wiley & Sons of Hoboken, NJ, copyright now held by C. D. Oliver and B. A. Larson, 1996).20 Emily E. Oldfield et al., ‘Growing the Urban Forest: Tree Performance in Response to Biotic and Abiotic Land Management’, Restoration Ecology 23/5 (2015), 707–718.21 Elisabeth B. Ward et al., ‘Positive Long-Term Impacts of Restoration on Soils in an Experimental Urban Forest’, Ecological Applications 31/5 (2021), e02336.22 Danica A. Doroski et al., ‘Factors Driving Natural Regeneration beneath a Planted Urban Forest’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 29 (2018), 238–247.23 See: George R. Robinson and Steven N. Handel, ‘Forest Restoration on a Closed Landfill: Rapid Addition of New Species by Bird Dispersal’, Conservation Biology 7/2 (1993), 271–278; and George R. Robinson and Steven N. Handel, ‘Directing Spatial Patterns of Recruitment During an Experimental Urban Woodland Reclamation’, Ecological Applications 10/1 (2000), 174–188.24 Max R. Piana et al., ‘Climate Adaptive Silviculture for the City: Practitioners and Researchers Co-create a Framework for Studying Urban Oak-Dominated Mixed Hardwood Forests’, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9 (2021), 750495.25 Jane Gamal-Eldin, Bartlett Experimental Forest, USDA Forest Service report (Radnor, PA: Communications, Northeast Research Station, 1998).26 Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, Inc., ‘Brooklyn Bridge Park: Planting Process’ (2015).27 See, for example, afforestation studies at Kissena Park, New York City, including: Emily E. Oldfield et al., ‘Positive Effects of Afforestation Efforts on the Health of Urban Soils’, Forest Ecology and Management 313 (2014), 266–273, and emerging research in upland oak stands, for example: Piana et al., ‘Climate Adaptive Silviculture for the City’, op. cit. (note 24).28 Julia Czerniak, George Hargreaves and John Beardsley (eds.), Large Parks (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2007).29 Joan Iverson Nassauer, ‘Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames’, Landscape Journal 14/2 (1995), 161–170.30 Anais Leger-Smith and Paul Smith, ‘Trans-scalar Design at Parc aux Angeliques, Bordeaux’, ’scape 16 (2019).31 Ingo Kowarik and Andreas Langer, ‘Natur-Park Sudgelande: Linking Conservation and Recreation in an Abandoned Railyard in Berlin’, in: Ingo Kowarik and Stefan Korner (eds.), Wild Urban Woodlands: New Perspectives for Urban Forestry (Berlin and New York: Springer, 2005), 287–299.32 Catherine Szanto, ‘Le Laboratoire de paysage d’Alnarp en Suede: une experience de “gestion creative”’, Projets de paysage. Revue scientifique sur la conception et l’aménagement de l’espace 16 (2017).Additional informationNotes on contributorsMax R. PianaMax Piana is a research ecologist with the USDA Forest Service’s Northern Research Station in Amherst, MA, USA. His research aims to bridge the science, management and design of urban greenspaces, from streetscapes to natural areas. Before joining the Forest Service, Piana received a PhD in Ecology & Evolution from Rutgers University and a Master in Environmental Management from the Yale School for the Environment.Nicholas PevznerNicholas Pevzner is an assistant professor in the department of Landscape Architecture at the University of Pennsylvania’s Weitzman School of Design. His research spans the utilization of urban ecological systems in design, design for renewable energy landscapes, and speculative designs for decarbonization. Prior to joining Penn, he received a Master of Landscape Architecture from the University of Pennsylvania and worked at the landscape architecture firm Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates in New York.Richard A. HallettRichard Hallett is a research ecologist with the USDA Forest Service’s Northern Research Station and studies urban ecology at the NYC Urban Field Station. His work focuses on urban and rural forest management and tree health. Before joining the Northern Research Station he worked on the Tongass National Forest in Alaska and for Mead Paper in the upper peninsula of Michigan. He received a PhD in Natural Resources from the University of New Hampshire.","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2259653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractForests in cities, from remnant woodlands to designed natural areas, are common and abundant. Ecologically similar to rural forests, these landscapes lend themselves to the principles of traditional forest management, such as silviculture. But the application of silviculture to forests in cities, at least in the United States, has long been met with resistance: as far back as Olmsted’s Central Park experiments with ‘planting thick and thinning quick’, public sentiment has been protective of trees, even when forest health would have benefitted from such treatments. Urban silviculture is a conceptual framework and a renewed call for a systematic approach to managing forests in cities that addresses cities’ socioecological context through adapted practices that integrate other disciplines, including design. Using emerging science and case studies, we explore how silviculture and landscape architecture, two allied yet often-alienated disciplines, can engage to create socially responsive evidence-based approaches that enhance the design, management and resilience of forested landscapes in cities.Keyword: forests in citiesurban silvicultureadaptive managementlandscape architectureecological designurban afforestation AcknowledgmentsWe thank the organizers of the Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms, and Global Warming conference at KU Leuven, as well as Morgan Grove and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US Government determination or policy.The work of Max R. Piana and Richard A. Hallett was authored as part of their official duties as Employees of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 USC. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under US Law. Nicholas Pevzner hereby waives their right to assert copyright, but not their right to be named as co-author in the article.Notes1 Roxi Thoren, ‘Deep Roots: Foundations of Forestry in American Landscape Architecture’, Scenario Journal (Spring 2014), scenariojournal.com/article/deep-roots/.2 Frederick L. Olmsted correspondence to Henry G. Stebbins, 1 February 1876, in: Charles E. Beveridge et al. (eds.), The Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted, Vol. VII: Parks, Politics, and Patronage, 1874–1882 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), 175–176.3 Frederick L. Olmsted and Jonathan Baxter Harrison, Observations on the Treatment of Public Plantations, More Especially Relating to the Use of the Axe (Boston: T.R. Marvin & Son, 1889).4 Charles Spague Sargent, ‘Mr. Vanderbilt’s Forest’, Garden and Forest 8 (21 February 1894), 71.5 Max R. Piana, Clara C. Pregitzer and Richard A. Hallett, ‘Advancing Management of Urban Forested Natural Areas: Toward an Urban Silviculture?’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 19/9 (2021), 526–535.6 Cecil C. Konijnendijk et al., ‘Defining Urban Forestry: A Comparative Perspective of North America and Europe’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4/3-4 (2006), 93–103.7 Piana, Pregitzer and Hallett, ‘Advancing Management’, op. cit. (note 5).8 Peter Harnik, Charlie McCabe and Alexandra Hiple, 2017 City Park Facts (San Francisco: The Trust For Public Land, 2017), tpl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CityParkFacts_2017.4_7_17.FIN_.LO_.pdf.9 Teresa Mexia et al., ‘Ecosystem Services: Urban Parks under a Magnifying Glass’, Environmental Research 160 (2018), 469–478.10 Clara C. Pregitzer et al., ‘Estimating Carbon Storage in Urban Forests of New York City’, Urban Ecosystems 25 (2022), 617–631.11 Christopher A. Lepczyk et al., ‘Biodiversity in the City: Fundamental Questions for Understanding the Ecology of Urban Green Spaces for Biodiversity Conservation’, BioScience 67/9 (2017), 799–807.12 D. S. Novem Auyeung et al., ‘Reading the Landscape: Citywide Social Assessment of New York City Parks and Natural Areas in 2013–2014’, Social Assessment White Paper No. 2 (New York: New York Department of Parks and Recreation, 2016), 1–69.13 Alexander J. Felson, Emily E. Oldfield and Mark A. Bradford, ‘Involving Ecologists in Shaping Large-Scale Green Infrastructure Projects’, BioScience 63/11 (2013), 882–890.14 The importance of long-term and sustained management of forests in cities is highlighted in recent urban ecology studies, for example: Brady L. Simmons et al., ‘Long-Term Outcomes of Forest Restoration in an Urban Park’, Restoration Ecology 24/1 (2016), 109–118; and Lea R. Johnson and Steven N. Handel, ‘Management Intensity Steers the Long-Term Fate of Ecological Restoration in Urban Woodlands’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 41 (2019), 85–92.15 Mark S. Ashton and Matthew J. Kelty, The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018).16 Piana, Pregitzer and Hallett, ‘Advancing Management’, op. cit. (note 5).17 Ibid.18 For a review of the multiple social and ecological factors that influence urban ecosystems, see: Steward T.A. Pickett et al., ‘Urban Ecological Systems: Scientific Foundations and a Decade of Progress’, Journal of Environmental Management 92/3 (2011), 331–362; and Lea R. Johnson et al., ‘Conceptualizing Social-Ecological Drivers of Change in Urban Forest Patches’, Urban Ecosystems 24 (2021), 633–648.19 Chadwick Dearing Oliver and Bruce A. Larson, Forest Stand Dynamics (Formerly published by John Wiley & Sons of Hoboken, NJ, copyright now held by C. D. Oliver and B. A. Larson, 1996).20 Emily E. Oldfield et al., ‘Growing the Urban Forest: Tree Performance in Response to Biotic and Abiotic Land Management’, Restoration Ecology 23/5 (2015), 707–718.21 Elisabeth B. Ward et al., ‘Positive Long-Term Impacts of Restoration on Soils in an Experimental Urban Forest’, Ecological Applications 31/5 (2021), e02336.22 Danica A. Doroski et al., ‘Factors Driving Natural Regeneration beneath a Planted Urban Forest’, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 29 (2018), 238–247.23 See: George R. Robinson and Steven N. Handel, ‘Forest Restoration on a Closed Landfill: Rapid Addition of New Species by Bird Dispersal’, Conservation Biology 7/2 (1993), 271–278; and George R. Robinson and Steven N. Handel, ‘Directing Spatial Patterns of Recruitment During an Experimental Urban Woodland Reclamation’, Ecological Applications 10/1 (2000), 174–188.24 Max R. Piana et al., ‘Climate Adaptive Silviculture for the City: Practitioners and Researchers Co-create a Framework for Studying Urban Oak-Dominated Mixed Hardwood Forests’, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9 (2021), 750495.25 Jane Gamal-Eldin, Bartlett Experimental Forest, USDA Forest Service report (Radnor, PA: Communications, Northeast Research Station, 1998).26 Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates, Inc., ‘Brooklyn Bridge Park: Planting Process’ (2015).27 See, for example, afforestation studies at Kissena Park, New York City, including: Emily E. Oldfield et al., ‘Positive Effects of Afforestation Efforts on the Health of Urban Soils’, Forest Ecology and Management 313 (2014), 266–273, and emerging research in upland oak stands, for example: Piana et al., ‘Climate Adaptive Silviculture for the City’, op. cit. (note 24).28 Julia Czerniak, George Hargreaves and John Beardsley (eds.), Large Parks (New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2007).29 Joan Iverson Nassauer, ‘Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames’, Landscape Journal 14/2 (1995), 161–170.30 Anais Leger-Smith and Paul Smith, ‘Trans-scalar Design at Parc aux Angeliques, Bordeaux’, ’scape 16 (2019).31 Ingo Kowarik and Andreas Langer, ‘Natur-Park Sudgelande: Linking Conservation and Recreation in an Abandoned Railyard in Berlin’, in: Ingo Kowarik and Stefan Korner (eds.), Wild Urban Woodlands: New Perspectives for Urban Forestry (Berlin and New York: Springer, 2005), 287–299.32 Catherine Szanto, ‘Le Laboratoire de paysage d’Alnarp en Suede: une experience de “gestion creative”’, Projets de paysage. Revue scientifique sur la conception et l’aménagement de l’espace 16 (2017).Additional informationNotes on contributorsMax R. PianaMax Piana is a research ecologist with the USDA Forest Service’s Northern Research Station in Amherst, MA, USA. His research aims to bridge the science, management and design of urban greenspaces, from streetscapes to natural areas. Before joining the Forest Service, Piana received a PhD in Ecology & Evolution from Rutgers University and a Master in Environmental Management from the Yale School for the Environment.Nicholas PevznerNicholas Pevzner is an assistant professor in the department of Landscape Architecture at the University of Pennsylvania’s Weitzman School of Design. His research spans the utilization of urban ecological systems in design, design for renewable energy landscapes, and speculative designs for decarbonization. Prior to joining Penn, he received a Master of Landscape Architecture from the University of Pennsylvania and worked at the landscape architecture firm Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates in New York.Richard A. HallettRichard Hallett is a research ecologist with the USDA Forest Service’s Northern Research Station and studies urban ecology at the NYC Urban Field Station. His work focuses on urban and rural forest management and tree health. Before joining the Northern Research Station he worked on the Tongass National Forest in Alaska and for Mead Paper in the upper peninsula of Michigan. He received a PhD in Natural Resources from the University of New Hampshire.
摘要城市森林,从残存林地到设计的自然区域,都是普遍而丰富的。这些景观在生态上与农村森林相似,适合传统的森林管理原则,例如造林。但是,至少在美国,将造林技术应用于城市森林长期以来一直受到抵制:早在奥姆斯特德的中央公园进行的“种植茂密,迅速间伐”的实验中,公众的情绪就已经保护了树木,即使这样的处理会使森林健康受益。城市森林栽培是一个概念性框架,也是对系统化城市森林管理方法的再次呼吁,通过整合包括设计在内的其他学科的适应性实践来解决城市的社会生态背景。利用新兴科学和案例研究,我们探索了森林文化和景观建筑这两个相互关联但往往相互疏离的学科如何能够相互作用,创造出对社会有响应的循证方法,从而增强城市森林景观的设计、管理和复原力。感谢鲁汶大学“城市森林、森林城市化和全球变暖”会议的组织者,以及Morgan Grove和三位匿名审稿人对本文早期版本的评论。本出版物中的发现和结论是作者的发现和结论,不应被解释为代表任何美国农业部或美国政府的官方决定或政策。Max R. Piana和Richard a . Hallett的工作是作为美国政府雇员的官方职责的一部分而撰写的,因此是美国政府的工作。根据17 USC。根据美国法律,此类作品不受版权保护。Nicholas Pevzner特此放弃他们主张版权的权利,但不是他们在文章中被命名为合著者的权利。注1 Roxi Thoren,“深根:美国景观建筑中的林业基础”,Scenario Journal(2014年春季),scenariojournal.com/article/deep-roots/.2 Frederick L. Olmsted与Henry G. Stebbins的通信,1876年2月1日,in: Charles E. Beveridge等人(编辑),Frederick Law Olmsted的论文,卷七:公园,政治和赞助,1874-1882(巴尔的摩:3 .约翰·霍普金斯大学出版社,2007),175-176.3弗雷德里克·l·奥姆斯特德和乔纳森·巴克斯特·哈里森,《对公共种植园处理的观察,尤其是与斧头的使用有关的观察》(波士顿:T.R.马文和儿子出版社,1889)查尔斯·斯普格·萨金特先生。《范德比尔特的森林》,《花园与森林》8(1894年2月21日),71.5 Max R. Piana, Clara C. Pregitzer和Richard A. Hallett,《推进城市森林自然区域的管理:走向城市森林文化?》,《生态与环境前沿》19/9 (2021),526-535.6 Cecil C. Konijnendijk等人,“定义城市林业:北美和欧洲的比较视角”,《城市林业与城市绿化》4/3-4 (2006),93-103.7 Piana, Pregitzer和Hallett,《推进管理》,同上(注5)Peter Harnik, Charlie McCabe和Alexandra Hiple, 2017城市公园事实(旧金山:公共土地信托,2017),tpl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CityParkFacts_2017.4_7_17.FIN_.LO_.pdf.9 Teresa Mexia等人,“生态系统服务:“放大镜下的城市公园”,环境研究160 (2018),469-478.10 Clara C. Pregitzer等人,“估算纽约市城市森林的碳储量”,城市生态系统25 (2022),617-631.11 Christopher a . Lepczyk等人,“城市生物多样性:理解生物多样性保护的城市绿地生态的基本问题”,生物科学67/9 (2017),799-807.12 D. S. Novem Auyeung等人,“阅读景观:Alexander J. Felson, Emily E. Oldfield和Mark A. Bradford,“让生态学家参与塑造大型绿色基础设施项目”,《生物科学》63/11(2013),882-890.14最近的城市生态学研究强调了城市森林长期和可持续管理的重要性,例如:Brady L. Simmons et al.,“城市公园森林恢复的长期结果”,恢复生态学24/1 (2016),109-118;Mark S. Ashton和Matthew J. Kelty,《造林实践:应用森林生态学》(Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018).16Piana, Pregitzer和Hallett,“推进管理”,同上(注5)同前。
期刊介绍:
JoLA is the academic Journal of the European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools (ECLAS), established in 2006. It is published three times a year. JoLA aims to support, stimulate, and extend scholarly debate in Landscape Architecture and related fields. It also gives space to the reflective practitioner and to design research. The journal welcomes articles addressing any aspect of Landscape Architecture, to cultivate the diverse identity of the discipline. JoLA is internationally oriented and seeks to both draw in and contribute to global perspectives through its four key sections: the ‘Articles’ section features both academic scholarship and research related to professional practice; the ‘Under the Sky’ section fosters research based on critical analysis and interpretation of built projects; the ‘Thinking Eye’ section presents research based on thoughtful experimentation in visual methodologies and media; the ‘Review’ section presents critical reflection on recent literature, conferences and/or exhibitions relevant to Landscape Architecture.