Glass fibre composites recycling using the fluidised bed: A study into the economic viability in the UK

Kyle Pender, Liu Yang
{"title":"Glass fibre composites recycling using the fluidised bed: A study into the economic viability in the UK","authors":"Kyle Pender, Liu Yang","doi":"10.3934/ctr.2023014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<abstract> <p>As it stands, the UK has no commercialised process capable of recycling waste glass fibre reinforced thermosets, resulting in disposal via landfill or energy from waste facilities. Thermal recycling within a fluidised bed process has been demonstrated to successfully recover clean glass fibre from composite waste materials, such as wind turbine blades, and successfully reuse it as a reinforcement phase in second life composites. If brought to a commercial scale, this technology has the potential to divert up to 1200 kt of mixed glass fibre reinforced plastics (GRP) waste and an additional 240 kt of wind blade waste away from UK landfill sites over the next fifteen years, while offsetting the environmental impact and raw material consumption of virgin glass fibre production. Despite this, commercialisation and long-term success depend on economic viability and resilience of the recycling technology, ensuring that sufficient value is added to offset costs required to bring recyclate products to market. In this study, techno-economic analysis was used to analyse the economic outlook for at scale fluidised bed recycling plants within the context of the current and future UK glass fibre reinforced plastic waste landscape. It was found that fluidised bed recycling plants operating well within current UK waste volumes can maintain gate fees that are competitive with landfill while producing recycled glass fibre (rGF) at less than 50% of the prices of virgin counterparts. Plants processing single waste streams, such as wind blades, can maintain long term profitability despite irregular flow of waste feedstock availability. Despite higher transportation cost, total recycling costs are lower for national level plants. Therefore, it is recommended to accept composites from multiple waste streams to maximise operating capacity, profits and return on investment.</p> </abstract>","PeriodicalId":500288,"journal":{"name":"Clean Technologies and Recycling","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean Technologies and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/ctr.2023014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As it stands, the UK has no commercialised process capable of recycling waste glass fibre reinforced thermosets, resulting in disposal via landfill or energy from waste facilities. Thermal recycling within a fluidised bed process has been demonstrated to successfully recover clean glass fibre from composite waste materials, such as wind turbine blades, and successfully reuse it as a reinforcement phase in second life composites. If brought to a commercial scale, this technology has the potential to divert up to 1200 kt of mixed glass fibre reinforced plastics (GRP) waste and an additional 240 kt of wind blade waste away from UK landfill sites over the next fifteen years, while offsetting the environmental impact and raw material consumption of virgin glass fibre production. Despite this, commercialisation and long-term success depend on economic viability and resilience of the recycling technology, ensuring that sufficient value is added to offset costs required to bring recyclate products to market. In this study, techno-economic analysis was used to analyse the economic outlook for at scale fluidised bed recycling plants within the context of the current and future UK glass fibre reinforced plastic waste landscape. It was found that fluidised bed recycling plants operating well within current UK waste volumes can maintain gate fees that are competitive with landfill while producing recycled glass fibre (rGF) at less than 50% of the prices of virgin counterparts. Plants processing single waste streams, such as wind blades, can maintain long term profitability despite irregular flow of waste feedstock availability. Despite higher transportation cost, total recycling costs are lower for national level plants. Therefore, it is recommended to accept composites from multiple waste streams to maximise operating capacity, profits and return on investment.

利用流化床回收玻璃纤维复合材料:对英国经济可行性的研究
& lt; abstract>就目前而言,英国还没有能够回收废弃玻璃纤维增强热固性塑料的商业化工艺,只能通过垃圾填埋场或废物处理设施进行处理。在流化床过程中的热回收已被证明可以成功地从复合材料废料(如风力涡轮机叶片)中回收干净的玻璃纤维,并成功地将其作为二次使用复合材料的增强阶段重新使用。如果达到商业规模,这项技术有可能在未来15年内从英国的垃圾填埋场转移多达1200万吨的混合玻璃纤维增强塑料(GRP)废物和另外240万吨的风力叶片废物,同时抵消原始玻璃纤维生产对环境的影响和原材料的消耗。尽管如此,商业化和长期成功取决于回收技术的经济可行性和弹性,确保增加足够的价值来抵消将回收产品推向市场所需的成本。在这项研究中,技术经济分析被用来分析在当前和未来英国玻璃纤维增强塑料废物景观的背景下,大规模流化床回收厂的经济前景。研究发现,在目前英国废物量范围内运行良好的流化床回收厂可以保持与垃圾填埋场竞争的门票费,同时生产再生玻璃纤维(rGF)的价格低于原始同类价格的50%。处理单一废物流(如风力叶片)的工厂可以在废物原料供应不规律的情况下保持长期盈利能力。尽管运输成本较高,但国家级工厂的总回收成本较低。因此,建议从多个废物流中接受复合材料,以最大限度地提高运营能力、利润和投资回报。& lt; / abstract>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信