Responsible research and innovation in innovation value chains: focus on the catalytic role of non-governmental organizations

IF 3.9 1区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Journal of Responsible Innovation Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/23299460.2023.2257074

Carmine Passavanti, C. Ponsiglione, S. Primario, P. Rippa

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the role of NGOs in Innovation Value Chains (IVCs) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). It investigates how NGOs' presence influences RRI adoption in ecosystems and whether their strong RRI focus enhances its diffusion. Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation are employed for analysis. Findings reveal that NGOs promote RRI when adopting intermediate RRI values for consortium evaluation, whereas strict criteria hinder RRI diffusion. Highly RRI-oriented NGOs foster knowledge dissemination and network diversity, despite limited IVC involvement. These insights offer guidance for Research Funding Organizations to promote RRI and assist Research Performing Organizations in managing dynamic innovative networks.

查看原文本刊更多论文

创新价值链中的负责任研究与创新:关注非政府组织的催化作用

本研究探讨了非政府组织在创新价值链(IVCs)和负责任研究与创新(RRI)中的作用。研究了非政府组织的存在如何影响生态系统中RRI的采用，以及它们对RRI的强烈关注是否会促进其扩散。采用基于agent的建模和仿真方法进行分析。研究发现，非政府组织采用中间RRI值进行联合体评估时，促进了RRI的发展，而严格的标准则阻碍了RRI的扩散。高度重视研发的非政府组织促进知识传播和网络多样性，尽管IVC参与有限。这些见解为研究资助机构促进RRI和协助研究执行机构管理动态创新网络提供了指导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Responsible Innovation Multiple-

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.50%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.