The Gulf states and the energy transition in the Indo-Pacific

IF 0.9 Q2 AREA STUDIES
Farkhod Aminjonov, Li-Chen Sim
{"title":"The Gulf states and the energy transition in the Indo-Pacific","authors":"Farkhod Aminjonov, Li-Chen Sim","doi":"10.1080/19480881.2023.2262269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper examines the interdependence between the Gulf states and the Indo-Pacific in the context of the global energy transition away from a fossil-fuel based energy system. Instead of ending this energy interdependence, we argue that the energy transition presents opportunities for the Gulf states to address and manage energy governance issues with the Indo-Pacific. Applying a framework with four stylized choices comprising rule breaking, taking, promoting, and shaping, we find evidence that the Gulf states have evolved away from binary choices of rejecting or accepting the rules of global energy governance. Instead, some of them are becoming more adept at rule promoting and rule shaping, which, respectively, strengthen and contest but not undo the energy transition status quo.KEYWORDS: Energy transition governanceGulf statesIndo-Pacificrule shaper Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 There is a long-standing debate on the exact nature of the relationship between energy consumption and wealth although correlation is not disputed. For a review, see Tiba and Omri (Citation2017). Notwithstanding the above, there is a large body of research supporting the hypothesis that causation runs from income to energy consumption including in Asia (BP, Citation2019, p. 20; Kraft & Kraft, Citation1978; Raymond, Roselyne, & Ripple, Citation2021).2 The term ‘unabated’ fossil fuels refers to oil, gas, and coal that is consumed in a business-as-usual way without any reduction or capture of their climate-warming carbon and methane emissions.3 Circularity is an economic model that aims to keep resources in use for as long as possible based on the idea that resources should be reused, repaired, and/or recycled.4 In a rare instance of green hydrogen in Asia, ACWA Power concluded an MoU in 2022 with Thai energy company PTT and the Electricity Generating Authority for an investment of $7bn in green hydrogen projects in Thailand.5 Although China’s and India’s heavy coal consumption would also render them a focus of attention, their renewables industry is somewhat less welcoming than Indonesia’s to foreign power developers.6 These refer to the use of natural land or water-based ecosystems to absorb and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in order to offset carbon emissions from human activities such as the production, transport, and consumption of hydrocarbons. It is beyond the scope of the article to discuss the challenges of nature-based credits and offsets but see Cahill (Citation2022) and The Economist (Citation2022).Additional informationNotes on contributorsFarkhod AminjonovFarkhod Aminjonov is an Assistant Professor at the National Defense College, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Energy security, pipeline politics, sustainability transition, and governance, with a particular focus on Eurasia and the Gulf, lie at the center of his research interests. He has extensive experience engaging in individual and collaborative research projects with German, Canadian, Norwegian, American, and Turkish top-tier think tanks and such international organizations as the OSCE and the UN. His works appeared in the Journal of Contemporary China, RUSI Journal, Social Science Quarterly, UNISCI Journal, NUPI-OSCE Academy CADGAT Reports as well as multiple edited volumes by internationally recognized academic and policy-focused presses. He holds a Ph.D. from Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada and M.A. from Tsukuba University, Japan.Li-Chen SimLi-Chen Sim is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of International and Civil Security at Khalifa University in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates, and a non-resident scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington D.C. She is a specialist in the political economy of Russian and Gulf energy and its intersection with international relations. Her research interests include energy transition politics in the Middle East, Gulf-Asia exchanges, and Russia-Middle East interactions. She is the author of academic articles, chapters, and policy pieces published in leading journals such as Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Energy Research & Social Science, Journal of Contemporary China; on forums hosted by the Atlantic Council and Harvard University’s Belfer Center; and in popular media like the South China Morning Post and Al-Monitor. Her most recent co-edited books include Asian Perceptions of Gulf Security (Routledge 2023) and Low Carbon Energy in the Middle East and North Africa (Palgrave 2020). She holds a PhD from Oxford University.","PeriodicalId":53974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Ocean Region","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Ocean Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2023.2262269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper examines the interdependence between the Gulf states and the Indo-Pacific in the context of the global energy transition away from a fossil-fuel based energy system. Instead of ending this energy interdependence, we argue that the energy transition presents opportunities for the Gulf states to address and manage energy governance issues with the Indo-Pacific. Applying a framework with four stylized choices comprising rule breaking, taking, promoting, and shaping, we find evidence that the Gulf states have evolved away from binary choices of rejecting or accepting the rules of global energy governance. Instead, some of them are becoming more adept at rule promoting and rule shaping, which, respectively, strengthen and contest but not undo the energy transition status quo.KEYWORDS: Energy transition governanceGulf statesIndo-Pacificrule shaper Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 There is a long-standing debate on the exact nature of the relationship between energy consumption and wealth although correlation is not disputed. For a review, see Tiba and Omri (Citation2017). Notwithstanding the above, there is a large body of research supporting the hypothesis that causation runs from income to energy consumption including in Asia (BP, Citation2019, p. 20; Kraft & Kraft, Citation1978; Raymond, Roselyne, & Ripple, Citation2021).2 The term ‘unabated’ fossil fuels refers to oil, gas, and coal that is consumed in a business-as-usual way without any reduction or capture of their climate-warming carbon and methane emissions.3 Circularity is an economic model that aims to keep resources in use for as long as possible based on the idea that resources should be reused, repaired, and/or recycled.4 In a rare instance of green hydrogen in Asia, ACWA Power concluded an MoU in 2022 with Thai energy company PTT and the Electricity Generating Authority for an investment of $7bn in green hydrogen projects in Thailand.5 Although China’s and India’s heavy coal consumption would also render them a focus of attention, their renewables industry is somewhat less welcoming than Indonesia’s to foreign power developers.6 These refer to the use of natural land or water-based ecosystems to absorb and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in order to offset carbon emissions from human activities such as the production, transport, and consumption of hydrocarbons. It is beyond the scope of the article to discuss the challenges of nature-based credits and offsets but see Cahill (Citation2022) and The Economist (Citation2022).Additional informationNotes on contributorsFarkhod AminjonovFarkhod Aminjonov is an Assistant Professor at the National Defense College, Abu Dhabi, UAE. Energy security, pipeline politics, sustainability transition, and governance, with a particular focus on Eurasia and the Gulf, lie at the center of his research interests. He has extensive experience engaging in individual and collaborative research projects with German, Canadian, Norwegian, American, and Turkish top-tier think tanks and such international organizations as the OSCE and the UN. His works appeared in the Journal of Contemporary China, RUSI Journal, Social Science Quarterly, UNISCI Journal, NUPI-OSCE Academy CADGAT Reports as well as multiple edited volumes by internationally recognized academic and policy-focused presses. He holds a Ph.D. from Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada and M.A. from Tsukuba University, Japan.Li-Chen SimLi-Chen Sim is an Assistant Professor at the Institute of International and Civil Security at Khalifa University in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates, and a non-resident scholar at the Middle East Institute in Washington D.C. She is a specialist in the political economy of Russian and Gulf energy and its intersection with international relations. Her research interests include energy transition politics in the Middle East, Gulf-Asia exchanges, and Russia-Middle East interactions. She is the author of academic articles, chapters, and policy pieces published in leading journals such as Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Energy Research & Social Science, Journal of Contemporary China; on forums hosted by the Atlantic Council and Harvard University’s Belfer Center; and in popular media like the South China Morning Post and Al-Monitor. Her most recent co-edited books include Asian Perceptions of Gulf Security (Routledge 2023) and Low Carbon Energy in the Middle East and North Africa (Palgrave 2020). She holds a PhD from Oxford University.
海湾国家与印度-太平洋地区的能源转型
摘要本文探讨了在全球能源转型的背景下,海湾国家和印度-太平洋地区之间的相互依存关系。我们认为,能源转型并没有结束这种能源相互依赖,而是为海湾国家提供了解决和管理印度-太平洋地区能源治理问题的机会。我们采用了一个包含打破规则、接受规则、促进规则和塑造规则四种风格选择的框架,发现有证据表明,海湾国家已经从拒绝或接受全球能源治理规则的二元选择中走出来。相反,他们中的一些人正变得更善于推动规则和塑造规则,这分别加强和挑战了能源转型的现状,而不是改变现状。关键词:能源转型治理海湾国家印度-太平洋规则塑造者披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1尽管相关性没有争议,但关于能源消耗与财富之间关系的确切性质一直存在争论。有关评论,请参阅Tiba和Omri (Citation2017)。尽管如此,仍有大量研究支持这一假设,即因果关系从收入到能源消耗,包括在亚洲(BP, Citation2019,第20页;Kraft & Kraft, Citation1978;Raymond, Roselyne, & Ripple, Citation2021)“未减”化石燃料指的是石油、天然气和煤炭,它们以一种正常的方式被消耗,而没有减少或捕获它们导致气候变暖的碳和甲烷的排放循环是一种经济模型,其目的是在资源应该被重用、修复和/或回收的基础上,尽可能长时间地保持资源的使用在亚洲罕见的绿色氢能案例中,ACWA电力于2022年与泰国能源公司PTT和电力局签署了一项谅解备忘录,在泰国投资70亿美元的绿色氢能项目。尽管中国和印度的重度煤炭消费也将使它们成为关注的焦点,但它们的可再生能源行业对外国电力开发商的欢迎程度不如印度尼西亚这些是指利用自然土地或水基生态系统从大气中吸收和储存二氧化碳,以抵消人类活动(如碳氢化合物的生产、运输和消费)产生的碳排放。讨论基于自然的信用和抵消所面临的挑战超出了本文的范围,但请参阅Cahill (Citation2022)和the Economist (Citation2022)。本文作者farkhod Aminjonov是阿联酋阿布扎比国防学院的助理教授。他的研究兴趣主要集中在能源安全、管道政治、可持续性转型和治理,尤其关注欧亚大陆和海湾地区。他在德国、加拿大、挪威、美国和土耳其顶级智库以及欧安组织和联合国等国际组织的个人和合作研究项目中拥有丰富的经验。他的作品发表在《当代中国杂志》、《入寺学报》、《社会科学季刊》、《UNISCI学报》、《NUPI-OSCE Academy CADGAT报告》以及国际公认的学术和政策出版社编辑的多册刊物上。他拥有加拿大威尔弗里德劳里埃大学博士学位和日本筑波大学硕士学位。沈丽珍,阿拉伯联合酋长国阿布扎比哈利法大学国际与公民安全研究所助理教授,华盛顿中东研究所非常驻学者。她是俄罗斯和海湾能源的政治经济及其与国际关系的交叉领域的专家。她的研究兴趣包括中东能源转型政治、海湾-亚洲交流、俄罗斯-中东互动。她在《剑桥国际事务评论》、《能源研究与社会科学》、《当代中国学报》等主要期刊上发表了学术文章、章节和政策文章;在大西洋理事会和哈佛大学贝尔弗中心主办的论坛上;以及《南华早报》和Al-Monitor等大众媒体。她最近的合编书籍包括《海湾安全的亚洲认知》(Routledge出版社,2023年)和《中东和北非的低碳能源》(Palgrave出版社,2020年)。她拥有牛津大学的博士学位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信