Is online hemodiafiltration superior to hemodialysis in removal of indoxyl sulfate in chronic hemodialysis patients? A comparative study

MohamedSary Gharib, ImanIbrahim Sarhaan, MohamedSaeed Hassan, MarwaShaban Abd el samea, AmiraMohamed Mahmoud
{"title":"Is online hemodiafiltration superior to hemodialysis in removal of indoxyl sulfate in chronic hemodialysis patients? A comparative study","authors":"MohamedSary Gharib, ImanIbrahim Sarhaan, MohamedSaeed Hassan, MarwaShaban Abd el samea, AmiraMohamed Mahmoud","doi":"10.4103/jesnt.jesnt_4_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Indoxyl sulfate (IS) is a protein-bound small molecule that is poorly cleared by conventional hemodialysis and has potential toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the superiority of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over hemodialysis for the removal of IS in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Patients and Methods Sixty patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were enrolled in this prospective, randomized comparative study. Patients were randomly allocated to three groups: online post-dilution HDF, high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD), and low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD). Each group consisted of 20 patients. Serum total IS (tIS) levels were measured pre- and post-dialysis. The tIS removal rate was assessed by calculating the tIS reduction ratio (tISRR). Results Serum tIS levels decreased significantly after dialysis in all groups (all P < 0.001). The mean tISRR did not differ significantly between the HDF and HFHD (24.20 ± 10.73 vs. 19.70 ± 14.31%, P = 0.449) or between HFHD and LFHD (19.7 ± 14.3 vs. 13.5 ± 9.52%, P = 0.229). The ISRR for HDF was significantly higher than that for LFHD (24.2 ± 10.7 vs. 13.5 ± 9.52%, P = 0.015). Regression analysis did not show significant differences in ISRR between the HDF and HFHD groups, even after controlling for covariates (P = 0.160). Conclusion The study showed that online HDF had no additive effect on tIS removal compared to HFHD; however, it was superior to LFHD.","PeriodicalId":472816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Nephrology","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jesnt.jesnt_4_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Indoxyl sulfate (IS) is a protein-bound small molecule that is poorly cleared by conventional hemodialysis and has potential toxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the superiority of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) over hemodialysis for the removal of IS in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Patients and Methods Sixty patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were enrolled in this prospective, randomized comparative study. Patients were randomly allocated to three groups: online post-dilution HDF, high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD), and low-flux hemodialysis (LFHD). Each group consisted of 20 patients. Serum total IS (tIS) levels were measured pre- and post-dialysis. The tIS removal rate was assessed by calculating the tIS reduction ratio (tISRR). Results Serum tIS levels decreased significantly after dialysis in all groups (all P < 0.001). The mean tISRR did not differ significantly between the HDF and HFHD (24.20 ± 10.73 vs. 19.70 ± 14.31%, P = 0.449) or between HFHD and LFHD (19.7 ± 14.3 vs. 13.5 ± 9.52%, P = 0.229). The ISRR for HDF was significantly higher than that for LFHD (24.2 ± 10.7 vs. 13.5 ± 9.52%, P = 0.015). Regression analysis did not show significant differences in ISRR between the HDF and HFHD groups, even after controlling for covariates (P = 0.160). Conclusion The study showed that online HDF had no additive effect on tIS removal compared to HFHD; however, it was superior to LFHD.
慢性血液透析患者在线血液透析滤除硫酸吲哚酚是否优于血液透析?比较研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信