Cristiano Ticiani Feltrin Torneaux Cardoso, Ingrid de Campos Albuquerque, Amanda Silva dos Santos Aliança, Wellyson da Cunha Araújo Firmo, Ilana Mirian Almeida Felipe da Silva, Adriana Sousa Rêgo
{"title":"Satisfaction and quality of life of nurses satisfaction and quality of life of nurses in a public hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Cristiano Ticiani Feltrin Torneaux Cardoso, Ingrid de Campos Albuquerque, Amanda Silva dos Santos Aliança, Wellyson da Cunha Araújo Firmo, Ilana Mirian Almeida Felipe da Silva, Adriana Sousa Rêgo","doi":"10.9771/cmbio.v22i2.53898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life (QL) of nurses working in a public hospital. Method: This is a cross-sectional study developed during COVID-19 with nurses who had 6 months of work, between October 2020 and February 2021, at a State Oncological Reference Hospital in São Luís-MA. A questionnaire was applied on sociodemographic characteristics and the WHOQOL-bref and Employee Satisfaction Index (ESI) instruments. A normality test was performed followed by the Spearman correlation coefficient with a significance level of 5%. Results: 71 nurses participated in the survey and the average QL scores in all domains are regular (3.64) and employee satisfaction, in all domains, is low (2.50). A weak positive correlation was observed in all domains of the WHOQOL-bref and in the autonomy of the ESI (physical - r=0.482; psychological - r=0.285; social - r=0.318; and environment - r=0.251), while weak negative correlation was observed between the professional status and the psychological (r=-0.312) and the social (r=-0.374) domain and work and environment requirements (r=-0.295). Conclusion and implications for practice: The nurses showed regular and low QL, satisfied and knowing the reasons helps managers to propose interventions to reduce the QL benefit and to improve the care provided.","PeriodicalId":21339,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Ciências Médicas e Biológicas","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Ciências Médicas e Biológicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v22i2.53898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the satisfaction and quality of life (QL) of nurses working in a public hospital. Method: This is a cross-sectional study developed during COVID-19 with nurses who had 6 months of work, between October 2020 and February 2021, at a State Oncological Reference Hospital in São Luís-MA. A questionnaire was applied on sociodemographic characteristics and the WHOQOL-bref and Employee Satisfaction Index (ESI) instruments. A normality test was performed followed by the Spearman correlation coefficient with a significance level of 5%. Results: 71 nurses participated in the survey and the average QL scores in all domains are regular (3.64) and employee satisfaction, in all domains, is low (2.50). A weak positive correlation was observed in all domains of the WHOQOL-bref and in the autonomy of the ESI (physical - r=0.482; psychological - r=0.285; social - r=0.318; and environment - r=0.251), while weak negative correlation was observed between the professional status and the psychological (r=-0.312) and the social (r=-0.374) domain and work and environment requirements (r=-0.295). Conclusion and implications for practice: The nurses showed regular and low QL, satisfied and knowing the reasons helps managers to propose interventions to reduce the QL benefit and to improve the care provided.