International legal standards for the protection of internally displaced persons: theoretical and practical aspects

Nataliia Kaminska, Vladyslav Boiko
{"title":"International legal standards for the protection of internally displaced persons: theoretical and practical aspects","authors":"Nataliia Kaminska, Vladyslav Boiko","doi":"10.15587/2523-4153.2023.286478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the system of international legal standards for the protection of the rights and freedoms of internally displaced persons, their doctrinal sources, and mechanisms for ensuring them. The purpose of the article is to study the existing international legal standards on the protection of the rights and freedoms of internally displaced persons, their theoretical, contractual and institutional foundations, implementation problems and identification of improvement prospects.
 It is substantiated, that the system of standards for the protection of IDPs constitutes a kind of international mechanism for ensuring the status, first of all, the rights and freedoms of IDPs, the corresponding guarantees, which are regulated by the norms of universal, regional and special treaties, are implemented by authorized subjects at various levels and spheres of life. The standards of the universal, supranational, regional levels, ones of mandatory legal force and recommendatory, permanent and temporary, etc. are distinguished.
 Compared to refugees, who have a special mechanism of international protection, IDPs acquire protection indirectly, as they are under the legal protection of their country of citizenship and residence, its government, etc. Attention was drawn to the significance of the Guidelines of 1998, which are based on numerous acts of the Council of Europe, the EU, etc. However, the existing standards regarding IDPs do not have a unified character, as well as the corresponding institutional mechanism.
 Therefore, at the national level, the authorized bodies are assigned a significant amount of tasks, functions, and powers to ensure the rights and freedoms of IDPs, guarantee their implementation and protection, restore violated rights, and implement international standards and best foreign practices. Therefore, it is natural to improve the legislation of Ukraine, ensure effective and accessible procedures, and integrate IDPs into the life of the community, society and the state. It is expedient to activate our state in international law-making on the issue of IDPs for the solution of existing problems, first of all, their social protection, electoral rights, housing and land rights, provision of legal assistance, etc","PeriodicalId":30651,"journal":{"name":"ScienceRise","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceRise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2023.286478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the system of international legal standards for the protection of the rights and freedoms of internally displaced persons, their doctrinal sources, and mechanisms for ensuring them. The purpose of the article is to study the existing international legal standards on the protection of the rights and freedoms of internally displaced persons, their theoretical, contractual and institutional foundations, implementation problems and identification of improvement prospects. It is substantiated, that the system of standards for the protection of IDPs constitutes a kind of international mechanism for ensuring the status, first of all, the rights and freedoms of IDPs, the corresponding guarantees, which are regulated by the norms of universal, regional and special treaties, are implemented by authorized subjects at various levels and spheres of life. The standards of the universal, supranational, regional levels, ones of mandatory legal force and recommendatory, permanent and temporary, etc. are distinguished. Compared to refugees, who have a special mechanism of international protection, IDPs acquire protection indirectly, as they are under the legal protection of their country of citizenship and residence, its government, etc. Attention was drawn to the significance of the Guidelines of 1998, which are based on numerous acts of the Council of Europe, the EU, etc. However, the existing standards regarding IDPs do not have a unified character, as well as the corresponding institutional mechanism. Therefore, at the national level, the authorized bodies are assigned a significant amount of tasks, functions, and powers to ensure the rights and freedoms of IDPs, guarantee their implementation and protection, restore violated rights, and implement international standards and best foreign practices. Therefore, it is natural to improve the legislation of Ukraine, ensure effective and accessible procedures, and integrate IDPs into the life of the community, society and the state. It is expedient to activate our state in international law-making on the issue of IDPs for the solution of existing problems, first of all, their social protection, electoral rights, housing and land rights, provision of legal assistance, etc
保护国内流离失所者的国际法律标准:理论和实践方面
本文分析了保护国内流离失所者权利和自由的国际法律标准体系、其理论来源以及确保这些权利和自由的机制。这篇文章的目的是研究关于保护国内流离失所者的权利和自由的现有国际法律标准、其理论、合同和体制基础、执行问题和确定改进前景。事实证明,保护国内流离失所者的标准体系构成了一种国际机制,首先是确保国内流离失所者的地位和权利和自由,由普遍、区域和特别条约规范规定的相应保障,由各级和生活领域的授权主体执行。区分了普遍性标准、超国家标准、区域性标准、强制性标准和推荐性标准、永久性标准和临时性标准等。 与具有特殊国际保护机制的难民相比,国内流离失所者是间接获得保护的,因为他们受到国籍国和居住国、政府等的法律保护。会议提请注意1998年准则的重要性,该准则以欧洲委员会、欧盟等的许多法案为基础。然而,现有的关于流离失所者的标准并没有统一的特征,也没有相应的制度机制。 因此,在国家一级,授权机构被赋予了大量的任务、职能和权力,以确保国内流离失所者的权利和自由,保障其实施和保护,恢复被侵犯的权利,并实施国际标准和最佳外国做法。因此,改善乌克兰的立法,确保有效和无障碍的程序,并将国内流离失所者纳入社区、社会和国家的生活是很自然的。为了解决现有的问题,首先是他们的社会保护、选举权、住房和土地权利、提供法律援助等,在国内流离失所者问题的国际立法中激活我国是有利的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信