Criminal risks of medical robots turnover

A. A. Shutova
{"title":"Criminal risks of medical robots turnover","authors":"A. A. Shutova","doi":"10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.571-585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to identify criminal risks inherent in a medical robot, taking into account its hardware-technological (technological and digital) features, and to construct, based on this analysis, the author’s classification of criminal risks and models of criminal-legal protection of public relations arising in the medical robots’ turnover.Methods: the article uses general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, classification) and specific scientific methods of cognition, and the logical-legal method.Results: The security vulnerability of medical robots causes serious concern in manufacturers, programmers and those interacting with the robots in the healthcare industry. In medical institutions, robots interact closely with children, the elderly and the disabled, and it may not be clear to the patient whether the robot is working properly or being attacked. Any harm caused by a surgical robot as a result of unauthorized access (or other illegal actions) can undermine the public’s faith in medicine and in the healthcare system as a whole. Threats to the safety of medical robots can have further negative consequences for themselves, as such facts of unlawful influence can lead to robots breaking down or harming other nearby equipment that is the property of the healthcare institution, and worse – the life and health of patients or medical workers. In this regard, the paper identifies criminal risks and threats inherent in medical robots, and formulates measures to improve criminal legislation aimed at countering crimes arising against the legal turnover of medical robots (Article 2352 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).Scientific novelty: at the moment there are few Russian studies devoted to the legal regulation and protection of medical robots. Basically, such researches are done by medical scientists. However, in the Russian Federation, there are practically no special theoretical-legal studies, including those devoted to the study of criminal law issues of the protection of these legal relations, which confirms the relevance and significance of our research.Practical significance: the provisions and conclusions of the article can be used to further improve criminal legislation, and also lay the foundation for further research in criminal law science.","PeriodicalId":284471,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Economics and Law","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Economics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2023.3.571-585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: to identify criminal risks inherent in a medical robot, taking into account its hardware-technological (technological and digital) features, and to construct, based on this analysis, the author’s classification of criminal risks and models of criminal-legal protection of public relations arising in the medical robots’ turnover.Methods: the article uses general scientific (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, classification) and specific scientific methods of cognition, and the logical-legal method.Results: The security vulnerability of medical robots causes serious concern in manufacturers, programmers and those interacting with the robots in the healthcare industry. In medical institutions, robots interact closely with children, the elderly and the disabled, and it may not be clear to the patient whether the robot is working properly or being attacked. Any harm caused by a surgical robot as a result of unauthorized access (or other illegal actions) can undermine the public’s faith in medicine and in the healthcare system as a whole. Threats to the safety of medical robots can have further negative consequences for themselves, as such facts of unlawful influence can lead to robots breaking down or harming other nearby equipment that is the property of the healthcare institution, and worse – the life and health of patients or medical workers. In this regard, the paper identifies criminal risks and threats inherent in medical robots, and formulates measures to improve criminal legislation aimed at countering crimes arising against the legal turnover of medical robots (Article 2352 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).Scientific novelty: at the moment there are few Russian studies devoted to the legal regulation and protection of medical robots. Basically, such researches are done by medical scientists. However, in the Russian Federation, there are practically no special theoretical-legal studies, including those devoted to the study of criminal law issues of the protection of these legal relations, which confirms the relevance and significance of our research.Practical significance: the provisions and conclusions of the article can be used to further improve criminal legislation, and also lay the foundation for further research in criminal law science.
医疗机器人周转的犯罪风险
目的:识别医疗机器人固有的犯罪风险,结合其硬件技术(技术和数字)特点,在此基础上构建医疗机器人周转过程中犯罪风险的分类和公共关系的刑事法律保护模型。方法:运用一般科学(分析、综合、归纳、演绎、分类)和具体科学的认知方法,以及逻辑-法律方法。结果:医疗机器人的安全漏洞引起了医疗行业中机器人制造商、程序员以及与机器人交互人员的严重关注。在医疗机构中,机器人与儿童、老人和残疾人密切互动,病人可能不清楚机器人是在正常工作还是受到攻击。由于未经授权的访问(或其他非法行为),手术机器人造成的任何伤害都可能破坏公众对医学和整个医疗保健系统的信心。对医疗机器人安全的威胁可能对其本身产生进一步的负面影响,因为这种非法影响的事实可能导致机器人发生故障或损坏附近属于医疗机构财产的其他设备,更糟的是——病人或医务工作者的生命和健康。在这方面,该文件确定了医疗机器人固有的犯罪风险和威胁,并制定了改进刑事立法的措施,旨在打击因医疗机器人的合法周转而产生的犯罪(《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第2352条)。科学上的新颖性:目前俄罗斯很少有研究致力于医疗机器人的法律监管和保护。基本上,这些研究都是由医学科学家完成的。然而,在俄罗斯联邦,几乎没有专门的理论法律研究,包括专门研究这些法律关系保护的刑法问题的研究,这证实了我们研究的相关性和意义。现实意义:本文的规定和结论可用于进一步完善刑事立法,也为进一步开展刑法学研究奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信