Augmented Reality to Guide Lymph-Node Resection in Gynecologic Malignancies: A Pilot Study

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Danielle Mor-Hadar, Eyal Mor, Netanel Nagar, Oliana Vazhgovsky, Olga Saukhat, Shira Felder, David Hochstein, Tima Davidson, Shai Tejman-Yarden, Limor Helpman, Jacob Korach
{"title":"Augmented Reality to Guide Lymph-Node Resection in Gynecologic Malignancies: A Pilot Study","authors":"Danielle Mor-Hadar, Eyal Mor, Netanel Nagar, Oliana Vazhgovsky, Olga Saukhat, Shira Felder, David Hochstein, Tima Davidson, Shai Tejman-Yarden, Limor Helpman, Jacob Korach","doi":"10.1089/gyn.2023.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Identifying and resecting gynecologic lymph-node metastases can be challenging. Augmented reality (AR) may improve localization of such lesions and adjacent structures. Materials and Methods: For this prospective case series of women who had lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies at a tertiary-care center, a 3-dimensional targeted lesions model was created. It was based on preoperative axial imaging (computed tomography [CT] or positron emission tomography [PET]) of the lesions, which were evaluated by the surgical team preoperatively. The surgeon wore an AR wireless headset, enabling real-time use of the model to assist lymph-node resection. Results: This pilot study included 7 patients: 4 had lymphadenectomy with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; 2 had lymphadenectomy; and 1 had lymphadenectomy during pelvic exenteration. Median age was 53 (34–70) and mean body mass index was 28.3 (± 6.5). Mean operating room time was 223 (± 130.9) minutes, mean blood loss was 398.5 (± 600.1) mL, and 1 patient needed a blood transfusion. Overall, there were no significant differences between the preoperative assessments of the sizes and locations of the lesions with AR, compared to axial imaging. Surgeons' evaluations of the model revealed that 7 (50%) indicated that the AR model was superior to axial imaging; 4 (28.6%) noted that the AR model prompted them to change their surgical approaches. AR modeling changed the surgical approaches in 2 cases and improved surgical accuracy, disease characteristics, or intra- and postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: Preoperative evaluation with AR was meaningful, compared to conventional methods in 25%–50% of cases. The effect of AR should be investigated further in a larger study. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)","PeriodicalId":44791,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2023.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Identifying and resecting gynecologic lymph-node metastases can be challenging. Augmented reality (AR) may improve localization of such lesions and adjacent structures. Materials and Methods: For this prospective case series of women who had lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies at a tertiary-care center, a 3-dimensional targeted lesions model was created. It was based on preoperative axial imaging (computed tomography [CT] or positron emission tomography [PET]) of the lesions, which were evaluated by the surgical team preoperatively. The surgeon wore an AR wireless headset, enabling real-time use of the model to assist lymph-node resection. Results: This pilot study included 7 patients: 4 had lymphadenectomy with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; 2 had lymphadenectomy; and 1 had lymphadenectomy during pelvic exenteration. Median age was 53 (34–70) and mean body mass index was 28.3 (± 6.5). Mean operating room time was 223 (± 130.9) minutes, mean blood loss was 398.5 (± 600.1) mL, and 1 patient needed a blood transfusion. Overall, there were no significant differences between the preoperative assessments of the sizes and locations of the lesions with AR, compared to axial imaging. Surgeons' evaluations of the model revealed that 7 (50%) indicated that the AR model was superior to axial imaging; 4 (28.6%) noted that the AR model prompted them to change their surgical approaches. AR modeling changed the surgical approaches in 2 cases and improved surgical accuracy, disease characteristics, or intra- and postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: Preoperative evaluation with AR was meaningful, compared to conventional methods in 25%–50% of cases. The effect of AR should be investigated further in a larger study. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)
增强现实技术指导妇科恶性肿瘤淋巴结切除术:一项初步研究
目的:鉴别和切除妇科淋巴结转移是具有挑战性的。增强现实(AR)可以改善这类病变和邻近结构的定位。材料和方法:对于在三级保健中心接受妇科恶性肿瘤淋巴结切除术的妇女的前瞻性病例系列,创建了三维靶向病变模型。它是基于术前病变的轴向成像(计算机断层扫描[CT]或正电子发射断层扫描[PET]),由手术团队术前评估。外科医生戴着AR无线耳机,可以实时使用模型来辅助淋巴结切除。结果:本初步研究纳入7例患者:4例行淋巴结切除术合并子宫切除术和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术;2例行淋巴结切除术;1例在盆腔切除术时行淋巴结切除术。中位年龄53岁(34 ~ 70岁),平均体重指数28.3(±6.5)。平均手术室时间223(±130.9)分钟,平均失血量398.5(±600.1)mL, 1例患者需要输血。总的来说,术前评估的AR病变的大小和位置与轴向成像相比没有显著差异。外科医生对模型的评估显示,7(50%)表明AR模型优于轴向成像;4人(28.6%)指出AR模型促使他们改变手术入路。AR建模改变了2例手术入路,提高了手术准确性、疾病特征或手术中和术后预后。结论:与常规方法相比,术前AR评估在25%-50%的病例中有意义。AR的影响需要在更大的研究中进一步研究。(j妇科外科200xx:000)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The central forum for clinical articles dealing with all aspects of operative and office gynecology, including colposcopy, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, laser surgery, conventional surgery, female urology, microsurgery, in vitro fertilization, and infectious diseases. The Official Journal of the Gynecologic Surgery Society, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy, and the British Society for Cervical Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信