The role of sustainability knowledge-action platforms in advancing multi-stakeholder engagement on sustainability

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Data & policy Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1017/dap.2023.27
Oliver Bream McIntosh, Amy Burnett, Ira Feldman, Jenna A. Lamphere, Thomas A. Reuter, Emmanuelle Vital
{"title":"The role of sustainability knowledge-action platforms in advancing multi-stakeholder engagement on sustainability","authors":"Oliver Bream McIntosh, Amy Burnett, Ira Feldman, Jenna A. Lamphere, Thomas A. Reuter, Emmanuelle Vital","doi":"10.1017/dap.2023.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Within the last decade, online sustainability knowledge-action platforms have proliferated. We surveyed 198 sustainability-oriented sites and conducted a review of 41 knowledge-action platforms, which we define as digital tools that advance sustainability through organized activities and knowledge dissemination. We analyzed platform structure and functionality through a systematic coding process based on key issues identified in three bodies of literature: (a) the emergence of digital platforms, (b) the localization of the sustainable development goals (SDGs), and (c) the importance of multi-level governance to sustainability action. While online collaborative tools offer an array of resources, our analysis indicates that they struggle to provide context-sensitivity and higher-level analysis of the trade-offs and synergies between sustainability actions. SDG localization adds another layer of complexity where multi-level governance, actor, and institutional priorities may generate tensions as well as opportunities for intra- and cross-sectoral alignment. On the basis of our analysis, we advocate for the development of integrative open-source and dynamic global online data management tools that would enable the monitoring of progress and facilitate peer-to-peer exchange of ideas and experience among local government, community, and business stakeholders. We argue that by showcasing and exemplifying local actions, an integrative platform that leverages existing content from multiple extant platforms through effective data interoperability can provide additional functionality and significantly empower local actors to accelerate local to global actions, while also complex system change.","PeriodicalId":93427,"journal":{"name":"Data & policy","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2023.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Within the last decade, online sustainability knowledge-action platforms have proliferated. We surveyed 198 sustainability-oriented sites and conducted a review of 41 knowledge-action platforms, which we define as digital tools that advance sustainability through organized activities and knowledge dissemination. We analyzed platform structure and functionality through a systematic coding process based on key issues identified in three bodies of literature: (a) the emergence of digital platforms, (b) the localization of the sustainable development goals (SDGs), and (c) the importance of multi-level governance to sustainability action. While online collaborative tools offer an array of resources, our analysis indicates that they struggle to provide context-sensitivity and higher-level analysis of the trade-offs and synergies between sustainability actions. SDG localization adds another layer of complexity where multi-level governance, actor, and institutional priorities may generate tensions as well as opportunities for intra- and cross-sectoral alignment. On the basis of our analysis, we advocate for the development of integrative open-source and dynamic global online data management tools that would enable the monitoring of progress and facilitate peer-to-peer exchange of ideas and experience among local government, community, and business stakeholders. We argue that by showcasing and exemplifying local actions, an integrative platform that leverages existing content from multiple extant platforms through effective data interoperability can provide additional functionality and significantly empower local actors to accelerate local to global actions, while also complex system change.
可持续发展知识-行动平台在促进多方利益攸关方参与可持续发展方面的作用
在过去十年中,在线可持续发展知识行动平台激增。我们调查了198个以可持续发展为导向的网站,并对41个知识行动平台进行了审查,我们将其定义为通过有组织的活动和知识传播促进可持续发展的数字工具。我们基于三个文献中确定的关键问题(a)数字平台的出现,(b)可持续发展目标(sdg)的本地化,以及(c)多层次治理对可持续发展行动的重要性),通过系统编码过程分析了平台的结构和功能。虽然在线协作工具提供了一系列资源,但我们的分析表明,它们难以提供对可持续发展行动之间的权衡和协同作用的上下文敏感性和更高层次的分析。可持续发展目标本地化增加了另一层复杂性,其中多层次的治理、参与者和机构优先级可能会产生紧张关系,也可能会产生内部和跨部门协调的机会。根据我们的分析,我们提倡开发综合的开源和动态的全球在线数据管理工具,以便监测进展,并促进地方政府、社区和商业利益相关者之间的思想和经验的点对点交流。我们认为,通过展示和示范地方行动,一个综合平台通过有效的数据互操作性利用来自多个现有平台的现有内容,可以提供额外的功能,并显着赋予地方行动者加速地方到全球行动的能力,同时也可以复杂的系统变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信