Neuro-Rights and New Charts of Digital Rights: A Dialogue Beyond the Limits of the Law

Q3 Social Sciences
Rafael Yuste, Tomás de la Quadra-Salcedo
{"title":"Neuro-Rights and New Charts of Digital Rights: A Dialogue Beyond the Limits of the Law","authors":"Rafael Yuste, Tomás de la Quadra-Salcedo","doi":"10.2979/gls.2023.a886161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In this article, the authors address some of the most pressing issues that stem from the relationship between the technological advancements of the twenty-first century and legal regulation. The development of neurotechnology and artificial intelligence (AI), while offering considerable opportunities for the betterment of social life, also poses unprecedented risks. These challenges manifest in a wide variety of topics. Areas such as human rights treaties, antitrust law, property law, and labor law are affected by these developments. The risks associated with the unregulated use of neurotechnology and AI do not cease at the sectorial stage. Some of the values upon which current democratic systems and governance models are built could be equally threatened. In anticipation of the harming potential of unmitigated technological advances, some governments and international institutions have enacted legal provisions to regulate the current digital landscape. These normative instruments, including the Chilean Constitutional Amendment and European Charts of Digital Rights, are also analyzed in the following pages. The purpose of this article is not purely descriptive, but rather to spark a debate among legal scholars and experts in their respective fields. The approach followed here, dialogical in its nature, may provide a model for further collaboration. It is the authors' understanding that the regulation of neurotechnology and AI requires an interdisciplinary approach that is transnational in its scope.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2023.a886161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: In this article, the authors address some of the most pressing issues that stem from the relationship between the technological advancements of the twenty-first century and legal regulation. The development of neurotechnology and artificial intelligence (AI), while offering considerable opportunities for the betterment of social life, also poses unprecedented risks. These challenges manifest in a wide variety of topics. Areas such as human rights treaties, antitrust law, property law, and labor law are affected by these developments. The risks associated with the unregulated use of neurotechnology and AI do not cease at the sectorial stage. Some of the values upon which current democratic systems and governance models are built could be equally threatened. In anticipation of the harming potential of unmitigated technological advances, some governments and international institutions have enacted legal provisions to regulate the current digital landscape. These normative instruments, including the Chilean Constitutional Amendment and European Charts of Digital Rights, are also analyzed in the following pages. The purpose of this article is not purely descriptive, but rather to spark a debate among legal scholars and experts in their respective fields. The approach followed here, dialogical in its nature, may provide a model for further collaboration. It is the authors' understanding that the regulation of neurotechnology and AI requires an interdisciplinary approach that is transnational in its scope.
神经权利与数字权利新图表:超越法律界限的对话
摘要:本文探讨了21世纪技术进步与法律规制之间的关系所引发的一些最紧迫的问题。神经技术和人工智能(AI)的发展在为改善社会生活提供大量机会的同时,也带来了前所未有的风险。这些挑战体现在各种各样的主题中。人权条约、反垄断法、物权法和劳动法等领域受到这些发展的影响。与不受监管地使用神经技术和人工智能相关的风险不会在行业阶段停止。当前民主制度和治理模式赖以建立的一些价值观可能同样受到威胁。由于预料到技术进步带来的潜在危害,一些政府和国际机构制定了法律规定来规范当前的数字环境。这些规范性文书,包括《智利宪法修正案》和《欧洲数字权利图表》,也将在以下几页进行分析。这篇文章的目的不是纯粹的描述,而是在各自领域的法律学者和专家之间引发一场辩论。这里所采取的对话性质的办法可能为进一步的合作提供一种模式。作者的理解是,神经技术和人工智能的监管需要一种跨学科的方法,在其范围内是跨国的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信