Editor’s Note

Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1353/bdl.2023.a911881
Michael J. Chiarappa
{"title":"Editor’s Note","authors":"Michael J. Chiarappa","doi":"10.1353/bdl.2023.a911881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editor’s Note Michael J. Chiarappa As most readers of Buildings and Landscapes (B&L) know, the Vernacular Architecture Forum (VAF) emerged in 1980 from a cohort of researchers committed to liberating the compelling stories of buildings that were not being given adequate attention, or in some cases were simply being ignored. So, in no small way, while VAF is about buildings, it is also, in equal measure, about building a paradigm that democratizes our considerations regarding what is experienced and meaningful in the widely conceived realms of architectural tradition and cultural landscape. This double issue of B&L reflects these aspirations—both in its content and in the diversity of approaches taken by its authors. Throughout his career, longtime VAF member Joseph Sciorra has dedicated his energy to interpreting Italian American expressive culture, particularly as it has taken shape in the materiality of the group’s vibrant devotional displays of vernacular religiosity. While some Italian American street feasts (feste) honoring the Madonna and other Catholic saints are recognized through their sheer cultural endurance or historical imprint in a community’s collective memory, in other cases, they have gained wider public recognition through depictions in popular culture and cultural revitalization. But it is the “ephemeral constructions,” what Sciorra describes as “decorative illuminations, elaborate sidewalk altars, freestanding multistoried chapels, and various ambulatory structures,” that shape the contours of these ritualistic cultural landscapes. In the first exploration of its kind, Sciorra examines these fleeting material expressions and how they artistically imbue depth in devotions rooted in the Italian immigrant experience. Similarly, the theme of ephemerality is paramount in Tania Gutiérrez-Monroy’s article. She inverts the paradigm of architectural fixity, and instead, looks at place-making as a transient process inextricably connected to the bodies of women—soldaderas—who, while following soldiers, created fleeting domestic settings for them during the early twentieth-century Mexican Revolution. Central in constructing these settings were the improvised use of shawls that covered these women and the train cars that moved the troops. Shawls secured domestic items to women’s bodies and then transitioned to being temporary walls or tents when needed in settings where soldiers camped or were temporarily housed in train cars. The essays by Catherine Bishir and Alexander Wood take us into areas that have been a bedrock of vernacular architecture studies in the United States: the experience and occupational cultures of building artisans. Bishir’s work on enslaved building artisans in antebellum North Carolina has been central in wider national conversations concerning the roles African Americans played in constructing some of the country’s most well-known built environments. Along with illuminating the overlooked skill of enslaved artisans, Bishir provides vital methodological guidance for those investigating Black building artisans in other areas of the country and the tradition they established for themselves both before and following emancipation. Wood’s research takes us into a new building tradition following the Civil [End Page 1] War, focusing on the structural ironworkers of New York City during the second half of the nineteenth century. Seemingly taking a cue from the sublime sheen that would later be cast by Lewis Hine’s photographs of workers constructing the steel frame of the Empire State Building, Wood looks backward to the artisans who pioneered iron-framed structures, detailing the skill, tools, construction techniques, and unionization challenges they faced. This volume of B&L is rounded out by two essays, one by James Kelleher, whose content will be readily recognizable by vernacular architecture researchers—the framed buildings of seventeenth-and eighteenth-century New England—and one by Robert Craig, whose material may be less familiar: the use of fire insurance records and the insights they provide on vernacular buildings and landscapes. Kelleher aims to present new perspectives on what are variously known as New England’s “half houses” or end-chimney houses in southeastern Massachusetts, particularly the double-pile versions and how they structured interior organization. For Craig, the scarcity of documentary evidence that can sometimes accompany vernacular building and landscape patterns can be bolstered by the policy registers, daily reports, and graphic documents produced by insurance companies. Finally, if VAF is about work that liberates our thinking about...","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bdl.2023.a911881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Editor’s Note Michael J. Chiarappa As most readers of Buildings and Landscapes (B&L) know, the Vernacular Architecture Forum (VAF) emerged in 1980 from a cohort of researchers committed to liberating the compelling stories of buildings that were not being given adequate attention, or in some cases were simply being ignored. So, in no small way, while VAF is about buildings, it is also, in equal measure, about building a paradigm that democratizes our considerations regarding what is experienced and meaningful in the widely conceived realms of architectural tradition and cultural landscape. This double issue of B&L reflects these aspirations—both in its content and in the diversity of approaches taken by its authors. Throughout his career, longtime VAF member Joseph Sciorra has dedicated his energy to interpreting Italian American expressive culture, particularly as it has taken shape in the materiality of the group’s vibrant devotional displays of vernacular religiosity. While some Italian American street feasts (feste) honoring the Madonna and other Catholic saints are recognized through their sheer cultural endurance or historical imprint in a community’s collective memory, in other cases, they have gained wider public recognition through depictions in popular culture and cultural revitalization. But it is the “ephemeral constructions,” what Sciorra describes as “decorative illuminations, elaborate sidewalk altars, freestanding multistoried chapels, and various ambulatory structures,” that shape the contours of these ritualistic cultural landscapes. In the first exploration of its kind, Sciorra examines these fleeting material expressions and how they artistically imbue depth in devotions rooted in the Italian immigrant experience. Similarly, the theme of ephemerality is paramount in Tania Gutiérrez-Monroy’s article. She inverts the paradigm of architectural fixity, and instead, looks at place-making as a transient process inextricably connected to the bodies of women—soldaderas—who, while following soldiers, created fleeting domestic settings for them during the early twentieth-century Mexican Revolution. Central in constructing these settings were the improvised use of shawls that covered these women and the train cars that moved the troops. Shawls secured domestic items to women’s bodies and then transitioned to being temporary walls or tents when needed in settings where soldiers camped or were temporarily housed in train cars. The essays by Catherine Bishir and Alexander Wood take us into areas that have been a bedrock of vernacular architecture studies in the United States: the experience and occupational cultures of building artisans. Bishir’s work on enslaved building artisans in antebellum North Carolina has been central in wider national conversations concerning the roles African Americans played in constructing some of the country’s most well-known built environments. Along with illuminating the overlooked skill of enslaved artisans, Bishir provides vital methodological guidance for those investigating Black building artisans in other areas of the country and the tradition they established for themselves both before and following emancipation. Wood’s research takes us into a new building tradition following the Civil [End Page 1] War, focusing on the structural ironworkers of New York City during the second half of the nineteenth century. Seemingly taking a cue from the sublime sheen that would later be cast by Lewis Hine’s photographs of workers constructing the steel frame of the Empire State Building, Wood looks backward to the artisans who pioneered iron-framed structures, detailing the skill, tools, construction techniques, and unionization challenges they faced. This volume of B&L is rounded out by two essays, one by James Kelleher, whose content will be readily recognizable by vernacular architecture researchers—the framed buildings of seventeenth-and eighteenth-century New England—and one by Robert Craig, whose material may be less familiar: the use of fire insurance records and the insights they provide on vernacular buildings and landscapes. Kelleher aims to present new perspectives on what are variously known as New England’s “half houses” or end-chimney houses in southeastern Massachusetts, particularly the double-pile versions and how they structured interior organization. For Craig, the scarcity of documentary evidence that can sometimes accompany vernacular building and landscape patterns can be bolstered by the policy registers, daily reports, and graphic documents produced by insurance companies. Finally, if VAF is about work that liberates our thinking about...
分享
查看原文
Editor’s音符
《建筑与景观》(B&L)的大多数读者都知道,乡土建筑论坛(VAF)成立于1980年,由一群研究人员组成,他们致力于解放那些没有得到足够关注,或者在某些情况下被忽视的建筑的引人入胜的故事。因此,在很大程度上,虽然VAF是关于建筑的,但在同等程度上,它也是关于建立一种范式的,这种范式使我们对建筑传统和文化景观的广泛构想领域中的经验和意义的考虑民主化。《B&L》的这一期双月刊反映了这些愿望——既体现在其内容上,也体现在作者采取的方法的多样性上。在他的职业生涯中,VAF的长期成员Joseph Sciorra一直致力于诠释意大利裔美国人的表达文化,特别是当它在该团体充满活力的本土宗教虔诚的物质表现中形成时。虽然一些意大利裔美国人的街头盛宴(节日)是为了纪念麦当娜和其他天主教圣徒,因为他们纯粹的文化耐力或在社区集体记忆中的历史印记而得到认可,但在其他情况下,他们通过在流行文化和文化复兴中的描绘获得了更广泛的公众认可。但正是这些“短暂的建筑”,如西奥拉所描述的“装饰性的灯饰、精致的人行道祭坛、独立的多层教堂和各种流动的结构”,塑造了这些仪式性文化景观的轮廓。在这类作品的第一次探索中,西奥拉审视了这些转瞬即逝的物质表达,以及它们如何在艺术上渗透进植根于意大利移民经历的虔诚。同样,短暂性的主题在塔尼亚·古蒂姆·蒙罗伊的文章中也是最重要的。她颠覆了建筑固定的范式,相反,将场所制作视为与女兵身体不可分割地联系在一起的短暂过程——在20世纪早期的墨西哥革命中,女兵跟随士兵,为他们创造了短暂的家庭环境。建造这些场景的核心是临时使用的披肩,这些披肩覆盖着这些妇女和移动部队的火车车厢。披肩将家庭用品固定在妇女身上,然后在士兵扎营或临时住在火车车厢的地方,当需要时,它就变成了临时的墙壁或帐篷。Catherine Bishir和Alexander Wood的文章将我们带入了美国本土建筑研究的基石:建筑工匠的经验和职业文化。比希尔关于南北战争前北卡罗来纳州被奴役的建筑工匠的作品一直是有关非裔美国人在建造该国一些最著名的建筑环境中所扮演角色的更广泛的全国性对话的中心。除了阐明被奴役的工匠被忽视的技能外,Bishir还为那些调查该国其他地区的黑人建筑工匠以及他们在解放之前和之后为自己建立的传统的人提供了重要的方法论指导。伍德的研究将我们带入了内战之后的一种新的建筑传统,重点关注了19世纪下半叶纽约市的结构铁工人。似乎从刘易斯·海因(Lewis Hine)拍摄的建造帝国大厦钢框架的工人的照片中获得了崇高的光辉,伍德回顾了那些开创铁框架结构的工匠,详细介绍了他们所面临的技能、工具、施工技术和工会挑战。这本《B&L》由两篇文章组成,一篇是詹姆斯·凯莱赫的,其内容很容易被乡土建筑研究者所识别——17世纪和18世纪新英格兰的框架建筑——另一篇是罗伯特·克雷格的,其材料可能不太熟悉:火灾保险记录的使用以及它们对乡土建筑和景观的见解。凯莱赫的目的是对马萨诸塞州东南部新英格兰的“半屋”或烟囱末端房屋提出新的观点,特别是双桩版本以及它们如何构建内部组织。对于克雷格来说,有时伴随着当地建筑和景观模式的文献证据的缺乏可以通过政策登记、日常报告和保险公司制作的图形文件来支持。最后,如果VAF是关于解放我们思考的工作……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信