The Impact of Accounting for Industrial Hazards on the Efficiency of Occupational Risk Management

Q3 Engineering
E.B. Sugak
{"title":"The Impact of Accounting for Industrial Hazards on the Efficiency of Occupational Risk Management","authors":"E.B. Sugak","doi":"10.24000/0409-2961-2023-9-74-80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In accordance with the decisions of the Government of the Russian Federation, the occupational safety management system is being reformed in the country. The new model of this system, built on the basis of occupational risk management techniques, in particular, using the Deming — Shewhart cycle, makes it possible to qualitatively improve the prevention of occupational injuries. To methodologically support the transition to a new model of labor protection, the main regulatory documents were prepared and approved, and additions were made to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. However, the introduction of preventive mechanisms to improve working conditions is hampered by the problem of taking into account injuries of light and moderate severity. The established long-term practice of ignoring a significant number of industrial hazards conflicts with the requirements of mandatory implementation of procedures for managing occupational risks, which affects the efficiency of the activities carried out. In particular, in the European Union countries 10–40 times more accidents are registered than in Russia, but at the same time the injury severity rate there is 10 times lower. The International Labor Organization, using a special indicator on fatal injury statistics, suggested that the real number of people injured at work in Russia could range from 600 thousand to 1.2 million people in year. Using the example of Heinrich injury pyramid, the methods for recognizing industrial hazards that are in an obvious and hidden state are considered. Evidence-based statistics on the positive impact of the number of identified hazards on workplace safety are also provided. Taking into account the existing practice of risk accounting, it is proposed to use the injury severity coefficient as the main indicator of production safety. At the same time, one should strive not to reduce the injury frequency rate, but, on the contrary, to increase it, which will indicate an improvement in the recording of injuries.","PeriodicalId":35650,"journal":{"name":"Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2023-9-74-80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In accordance with the decisions of the Government of the Russian Federation, the occupational safety management system is being reformed in the country. The new model of this system, built on the basis of occupational risk management techniques, in particular, using the Deming — Shewhart cycle, makes it possible to qualitatively improve the prevention of occupational injuries. To methodologically support the transition to a new model of labor protection, the main regulatory documents were prepared and approved, and additions were made to the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. However, the introduction of preventive mechanisms to improve working conditions is hampered by the problem of taking into account injuries of light and moderate severity. The established long-term practice of ignoring a significant number of industrial hazards conflicts with the requirements of mandatory implementation of procedures for managing occupational risks, which affects the efficiency of the activities carried out. In particular, in the European Union countries 10–40 times more accidents are registered than in Russia, but at the same time the injury severity rate there is 10 times lower. The International Labor Organization, using a special indicator on fatal injury statistics, suggested that the real number of people injured at work in Russia could range from 600 thousand to 1.2 million people in year. Using the example of Heinrich injury pyramid, the methods for recognizing industrial hazards that are in an obvious and hidden state are considered. Evidence-based statistics on the positive impact of the number of identified hazards on workplace safety are also provided. Taking into account the existing practice of risk accounting, it is proposed to use the injury severity coefficient as the main indicator of production safety. At the same time, one should strive not to reduce the injury frequency rate, but, on the contrary, to increase it, which will indicate an improvement in the recording of injuries.
工业危害核算对职业风险管理效率的影响
根据俄罗斯联邦政府的决定,我国正在改革职业安全管理制度。该系统的新模型建立在职业风险管理技术的基础上,特别是采用了Deming - Shewhart循环,使得从质量上提高职业伤害的预防成为可能。为了在方法上支持向新的劳动保护模式过渡,编制和批准了主要的规范性文件,并对俄罗斯联邦劳动法进行了补充。然而,由于考虑到轻微和中度严重伤害的问题,采取预防机制以改善工作条件受到阻碍。忽视大量工业危害的既定长期做法与强制性执行管理职业风险程序的要求相冲突,影响了所开展活动的效率。特别是,在欧盟国家,登记的事故是俄罗斯的10 - 40倍,但与此同时,伤害严重程度比俄罗斯低10倍。国际劳工组织(International Labor Organization)使用一项关于致命伤害统计的特殊指标表明,俄罗斯每年因工受伤的实际人数可能在60万至120万人之间。以海因里希伤害金字塔为例,探讨了工业危害的识别方法。还提供了关于已查明的危害数量对工作场所安全的积极影响的循证统计数据。结合现有的风险核算实践,提出以伤害严重系数作为安全生产的主要指标。与此同时,人们不应该努力减少受伤频率,相反,应该增加它,这将表明受伤记录的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti
Bezopasnost'' Truda v Promyshlennosti Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信