The Royal Hibernian Academy of Arts: 200 Years of Social and Artistic Change

John Turpin
{"title":"The Royal Hibernian Academy of Arts: 200 Years of Social and Artistic Change","authors":"John Turpin","doi":"10.1353/stu.2023.a911710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Royal Hibernian Academy of Arts:200 Years of Social and Artistic Change John Turpin (bio) For two hundred years visitors to the annual exhibitions of the Royal Hibernian Academy (RHA) in Dublin have been attracted by the range of work on view: landscapes, seascapes, scenes of rural and urban life, portraits, still life, abstracts and subject paintings, together with various pieces in three dimensions. However, the RHA and its exhibitions were not aesthetic manifestations in isolation but were located within the complex historical fabric of Irish society. The exhibitions formed a bridge between the artists and their audience. Changes in Irish society and changes in art internationally impacted the RHA. In the twentieth century, as these factors changed significantly, art academies like the RHA acquired a reputation for conservatism and opposition to modernism, which damaged their standing and led to intellectual marginalisation. The bicentenary of the RHA offers an opportunity to review its history and set the Academy in the context of social, economic, political, and artistic change in Ireland. The role of art academies Art academies since the Renaissance were seen as modern and innovative in establishing painting and sculpture as among the liberal arts, akin to poetry, and not simply as manual artisan disciplines subject to guild restrictions. Princely rulers sponsored the establishment of academies of art to teach young artists and as manifestations of royal prestige and an enlightened vision of culture. Furthermore, the Enlightenment ideal of free trade in art in a wider market liberated artists from the restrictions of working for commissions alone. This led to the establishment in the eighteenth century of highly successful regular public art exhibitions with work for sale, as in the Paris Salon and the summer exhibitions of the Royal Academy in London, founded in 1768. Such exhibitions depended on a vibrant capitalist society with wealthy aristocratic and upper middle class collectors. The fusion in the Royal Academy in London of a representative body for professional artists and a shop window for sales and marketing reflected the commercial ideology [End Page 311] of Georgian England. It was the same model for the foundation of the RHA in 1823, despite the very different and less favourable social, economic and political conditions in Ireland. Regular public art exhibitions in Dublin with work for sale were established by the Society of Artists in Ireland in 1764. The Society of Artists was a private organisation that lasted for twenty years. It exhibited in the octagonal gallery it had constructed in South William Street, Dublin, which still exists – now the home of the Irish Georgian Society. These exhibitions ended when the artists lost control of the building as they were unable to complete payments for its construction. This indicated that Ireland was not comparable to London, as it lacked sufficient patronage from a widely based upper and middle class of wealthy collectors to sustain the society and generate significant profits. Just as important, it did not have the patronage of a resident monarch with a permanent court, nor of an established Church interested in commissioning religious subjects apart from portraits. Various short-lived exhibition sequences followed in Dublin. Individual artists were facilitated by the Dublin Society (later RDS), which lent them its gallery temporarily for exhibitions. The Dublin Society with its drawing schools trained many of the artists who were to be prominent subsequently when the RHA was founded, but its own focus remained on teaching skills, not exhibiting works of art for sale. The Irish artists lacked a corporate legal existence like the Royal Academy (RA) in London. Thus they lacked the power to own property corporately and the prestige to attract patronage. With the end of the long wars against France in 1815, there was throughout the UK (of which Ireland was then an integral part), a great surge of energy and optimism leading to the establishment of scientific and cultural societies in many cities, especially in the north of England. From 1820 a group of Irish artists realised that they needed an academy as a corporate body under royal patronage to represent them and to maintain an annual art exhibition in which to sell work and to run a school of...","PeriodicalId":488847,"journal":{"name":"Studies An Irish Quarterly Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies An Irish Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/stu.2023.a911710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Royal Hibernian Academy of Arts:200 Years of Social and Artistic Change John Turpin (bio) For two hundred years visitors to the annual exhibitions of the Royal Hibernian Academy (RHA) in Dublin have been attracted by the range of work on view: landscapes, seascapes, scenes of rural and urban life, portraits, still life, abstracts and subject paintings, together with various pieces in three dimensions. However, the RHA and its exhibitions were not aesthetic manifestations in isolation but were located within the complex historical fabric of Irish society. The exhibitions formed a bridge between the artists and their audience. Changes in Irish society and changes in art internationally impacted the RHA. In the twentieth century, as these factors changed significantly, art academies like the RHA acquired a reputation for conservatism and opposition to modernism, which damaged their standing and led to intellectual marginalisation. The bicentenary of the RHA offers an opportunity to review its history and set the Academy in the context of social, economic, political, and artistic change in Ireland. The role of art academies Art academies since the Renaissance were seen as modern and innovative in establishing painting and sculpture as among the liberal arts, akin to poetry, and not simply as manual artisan disciplines subject to guild restrictions. Princely rulers sponsored the establishment of academies of art to teach young artists and as manifestations of royal prestige and an enlightened vision of culture. Furthermore, the Enlightenment ideal of free trade in art in a wider market liberated artists from the restrictions of working for commissions alone. This led to the establishment in the eighteenth century of highly successful regular public art exhibitions with work for sale, as in the Paris Salon and the summer exhibitions of the Royal Academy in London, founded in 1768. Such exhibitions depended on a vibrant capitalist society with wealthy aristocratic and upper middle class collectors. The fusion in the Royal Academy in London of a representative body for professional artists and a shop window for sales and marketing reflected the commercial ideology [End Page 311] of Georgian England. It was the same model for the foundation of the RHA in 1823, despite the very different and less favourable social, economic and political conditions in Ireland. Regular public art exhibitions in Dublin with work for sale were established by the Society of Artists in Ireland in 1764. The Society of Artists was a private organisation that lasted for twenty years. It exhibited in the octagonal gallery it had constructed in South William Street, Dublin, which still exists – now the home of the Irish Georgian Society. These exhibitions ended when the artists lost control of the building as they were unable to complete payments for its construction. This indicated that Ireland was not comparable to London, as it lacked sufficient patronage from a widely based upper and middle class of wealthy collectors to sustain the society and generate significant profits. Just as important, it did not have the patronage of a resident monarch with a permanent court, nor of an established Church interested in commissioning religious subjects apart from portraits. Various short-lived exhibition sequences followed in Dublin. Individual artists were facilitated by the Dublin Society (later RDS), which lent them its gallery temporarily for exhibitions. The Dublin Society with its drawing schools trained many of the artists who were to be prominent subsequently when the RHA was founded, but its own focus remained on teaching skills, not exhibiting works of art for sale. The Irish artists lacked a corporate legal existence like the Royal Academy (RA) in London. Thus they lacked the power to own property corporately and the prestige to attract patronage. With the end of the long wars against France in 1815, there was throughout the UK (of which Ireland was then an integral part), a great surge of energy and optimism leading to the establishment of scientific and cultural societies in many cities, especially in the north of England. From 1820 a group of Irish artists realised that they needed an academy as a corporate body under royal patronage to represent them and to maintain an annual art exhibition in which to sell work and to run a school of...
皇家希伯尼亚艺术学院:200年的社会和艺术变革
两百年来,都柏林皇家希伯尼恩艺术学院(RHA)的年度展览吸引了参观者,展出的作品范围广泛:风景、海景、乡村和城市生活场景、肖像、静物、抽象画和主题画,以及各种三维作品。然而,爱尔兰皇家博物馆及其展览并不是孤立的美学表现,而是位于爱尔兰社会复杂的历史结构之中。这些展览在艺术家和观众之间架起了一座桥梁。爱尔兰社会的变化和国际艺术的变化影响了皇家艺术协会。在20世纪,随着这些因素的显著变化,像皇家艺术学院这样的艺术学院获得了保守主义和反对现代主义的声誉,这损害了它们的地位,导致了知识边缘化。爱尔兰皇家艺术学院的200周年纪念为回顾其历史提供了一个机会,并将学院置于爱尔兰社会、经济、政治和艺术变革的背景下。文艺复兴以来的艺术学院被认为是现代的和创新的,它将绘画和雕塑作为文科之一,类似于诗歌,而不仅仅是受公会限制的手工工匠学科。王室统治者资助建立艺术学院,以培养年轻艺术家,并作为王室威望和开明文化的表现。此外,在更广阔的市场中自由交易艺术的启蒙理想将艺术家从仅为佣金工作的限制中解放出来。这导致在18世纪建立了非常成功的定期公共艺术展览,并出售作品,如巴黎沙龙和1768年成立的伦敦皇家学院的夏季展览。这样的展览依赖于一个充满活力的资本主义社会,拥有富有的贵族和中上层阶级收藏家。在伦敦皇家艺术学院,专业艺术家的代表机构与销售和营销的商店橱窗的融合反映了乔治时代英国的商业意识形态。尽管爱尔兰的社会、经济和政治条件非常不同,而且不太有利,但1823年爱尔兰皇家骑马团的建立模式是相同的。1764年,爱尔兰艺术家协会在都柏林设立了定期的公共艺术展览,出售作品。艺术家协会是一个存在了二十年的私人组织。它在都柏林南威廉街建造的八角形画廊展出,这个画廊现在仍然存在——现在是爱尔兰格鲁吉亚协会的所在地。这些展览结束时,艺术家失去了对建筑的控制,因为他们无法完成它的建设费用。这表明爱尔兰不能与伦敦相比,因为它缺乏来自广泛的上层和中产阶级富裕收藏家的足够赞助,以维持社会并产生可观的利润。同样重要的是,它没有一个拥有永久法庭的常驻君主的赞助,也没有一个对委托肖像画以外的宗教主题感兴趣的既定教会。随后在都柏林举办了一系列短期展览。个别艺术家由都柏林协会(后来的RDS)提供便利,该协会将其画廊临时借给他们举办展览。都柏林协会及其绘画学校培养了许多艺术家,这些艺术家后来在RHA成立时崭露头角,但它自己的重点仍然是教学技能,而不是展示艺术作品出售。爱尔兰艺术家缺乏像伦敦皇家艺术学院(Royal Academy)那样的法人合法存在。因此,他们缺乏共同拥有财产的权力,也缺乏吸引赞助的声望。随着1815年对法国的长期战争的结束,整个英国(当时爱尔兰是英国不可分割的一部分)充满了活力和乐观主义,许多城市,特别是英格兰北部的城市,建立了科学和文化协会。从1820年开始,一群爱尔兰艺术家意识到,他们需要一个学院,作为一个在王室赞助下的法人团体,代表他们,维护每年的艺术展览,出售作品,并经营一所学校……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信