Prefiguring an Abolitionist University: To Be In But Not Of

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
Emma Kauffman
{"title":"Prefiguring an Abolitionist University: To Be In But Not Of","authors":"Emma Kauffman","doi":"10.3138/topia-2023-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article begins from the perspective that the prison and the university are different sides of the same coin. Both the university and the prison have a symbiotic relationship with one another: like the prison, the university is a power broker—it is invested in the same intersecting regimes of power—hetero-patriarchal capitalism, white supremacy, and settler colonialism—benefitting from the success, and emulating the design of these structures. It is thus the author’s contention that studying abolition requires experimentation with theoretical modes and conceptual practices that might reorient study itself and provide alternative coordinates for the development of abolitionist futures.","PeriodicalId":43438,"journal":{"name":"Topia-Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topia-Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/topia-2023-0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article begins from the perspective that the prison and the university are different sides of the same coin. Both the university and the prison have a symbiotic relationship with one another: like the prison, the university is a power broker—it is invested in the same intersecting regimes of power—hetero-patriarchal capitalism, white supremacy, and settler colonialism—benefitting from the success, and emulating the design of these structures. It is thus the author’s contention that studying abolition requires experimentation with theoretical modes and conceptual practices that might reorient study itself and provide alternative coordinates for the development of abolitionist futures.
预示着一所废奴主义大学:在而不在
本文从监狱和大学是同一枚硬币的两面这一角度出发。大学和监狱都有一种共生关系:就像监狱一样,大学是一个权力掮客——它投资于同样交叉的权力——异性恋父权资本主义、白人至上主义和定居者殖民主义——从成功中获益,并模仿这些结构的设计。因此,作者的论点是,研究废奴需要对理论模式和概念实践进行实验,这可能会重新定位研究本身,并为废奴主义未来的发展提供替代坐标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信