Integrating video feedback into architectural design education to engage diverse learning styles

IF 2.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Isra M. Al-Shdaifat, Laith M. Obeidat, Shouib Nouh Mabdeh, Loai Alzoubi, Sukina H. Al-Khazaleh
{"title":"Integrating video feedback into architectural design education to engage diverse learning styles","authors":"Isra M. Al-Shdaifat, Laith M. Obeidat, Shouib Nouh Mabdeh, Loai Alzoubi, Sukina H. Al-Khazaleh","doi":"10.1080/23311916.2023.2269651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of video-based feedback in enhancing learning outcomes for undergraduate students in the field of architectural engineering. The research addresses a gap in the existing literature by exploring the impact of video feedback on students with different learning styles. The study involved 26 participants from Al al-Bayt University, who were enrolled in a four-week summer workshop. Participants’ learning styles were identified using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, encompassing divergent, assimilator, convergent, and accommodator styles. The study employed a quasi-experimental design, with participants assigned to two groups: a video feedback group (experimental group) and an in-person feedback group (control group). The video feedback group received video-based feedback on their assignments during phase 2, while the in-person feedback group received traditional face-to-face feedback. Performance scores and perceptions of feedback quality were analyzed using a formative feedback perception scale. The results revealed that video-based feedback significantly influenced feedback development and understandability throughout the design process. Statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences in performance scores between the video feedback group and the in-person feedback group. The findings of this study have practical implications for educators and instructional designers in architectural design education. Incorporating video-based feedback into teaching practices can enhance learning outcomes and improve the overall quality of feedback provided to students. The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by shedding light on the effectiveness of video-based feedback in the context of architectural engineering education.","PeriodicalId":10464,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2269651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of video-based feedback in enhancing learning outcomes for undergraduate students in the field of architectural engineering. The research addresses a gap in the existing literature by exploring the impact of video feedback on students with different learning styles. The study involved 26 participants from Al al-Bayt University, who were enrolled in a four-week summer workshop. Participants’ learning styles were identified using Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory, encompassing divergent, assimilator, convergent, and accommodator styles. The study employed a quasi-experimental design, with participants assigned to two groups: a video feedback group (experimental group) and an in-person feedback group (control group). The video feedback group received video-based feedback on their assignments during phase 2, while the in-person feedback group received traditional face-to-face feedback. Performance scores and perceptions of feedback quality were analyzed using a formative feedback perception scale. The results revealed that video-based feedback significantly influenced feedback development and understandability throughout the design process. Statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences in performance scores between the video feedback group and the in-person feedback group. The findings of this study have practical implications for educators and instructional designers in architectural design education. Incorporating video-based feedback into teaching practices can enhance learning outcomes and improve the overall quality of feedback provided to students. The study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by shedding light on the effectiveness of video-based feedback in the context of architectural engineering education.
将视频反馈整合到建筑设计教育中,以吸引不同的学习方式
本研究旨在探讨基于视频的反馈在提高建筑工程专业本科生学习成果方面的有效性。本研究通过探讨视频反馈对不同学习风格学生的影响,填补了现有文献的空白。这项研究涉及来自Al Al - bayt大学的26名参与者,他们参加了为期四周的夏季研讨会。使用科尔布学习风格量表来确定参与者的学习风格,包括发散型、同化型、收敛型和适应型。该研究采用了准实验设计,参与者被分为两组:视频反馈组(实验组)和面对面反馈组(对照组)。在第二阶段,视频反馈组收到了基于视频的作业反馈,而面对面反馈组收到了传统的面对面反馈。使用形成性反馈感知量表分析绩效得分和反馈质量感知。结果显示,基于视频的反馈在整个设计过程中显著影响了反馈的发展和可理解性。统计分析表明,视频反馈组和现场反馈组在表现得分上存在显著差异。本研究结果对建筑设计教育的教育者和教学设计师具有实际意义。将基于视频的反馈纳入教学实践可以提高学习效果,并提高提供给学生的反馈的整体质量。该研究通过揭示基于视频的反馈在建筑工程教育背景下的有效性,为现有的知识体系做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cogent Engineering
Cogent Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
213
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: One of the largest, multidisciplinary open access engineering journals of peer-reviewed research, Cogent Engineering, part of the Taylor & Francis Group, covers all areas of engineering and technology, from chemical engineering to computer science, and mechanical to materials engineering. Cogent Engineering encourages interdisciplinary research and also accepts negative results, software article, replication studies and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信