The Analysis of Decision of The Constitutional Court Number 97/Puu-Xiv/2016 Concerning Population Administration on The Rights and Position of Believers

Abidin Latua
{"title":"The Analysis of Decision of The Constitutional Court Number 97/Puu-Xiv/2016 Concerning Population Administration on The Rights and Position of Believers","authors":"Abidin Latua","doi":"10.31941/pj.v22i1.2973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<em>The research is to take a closer and explicit look at the position of believers in the Constitutional Court's decision through synchronizing the existence or existence of believers in Yogyakarta. In order to ensure whether or not these concerns are true, and to what extent are the rights and positions guaranteed in the decision of the Constitutional Court, and what is the position of believers in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUUXIV/2016 concerning Population administration in terms of perspective (Maqāṣid ash-Syarī‘ah). The type of legal research used in the preparation of this research is field research, which is conducting direct observations with in-depth interviews with sources that have been determined based on the researcher's knowledge using the purposive sampling method. The approach used in this research is normative juridical (Statute Approach) and empirical or sociological juridical. The normative juridical approach is carried out by referring to the legal norms contained in the legislation, decisions and legal norms that exist in society. The results of the research show that the considerations of the judges of the Constitutional Court related to the Philosophical, Textual, and Sociological Legal Interpreters in deciding the case Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 concerning the review of the Population Administration Law, have fulfilled the basic rights of believers and provide justice to adherents of the sect. trust, then when viewed with the study of Human Rights the Constitutional Court's </em>","PeriodicalId":471669,"journal":{"name":"Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum (edisi elektronik)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum (edisi elektronik)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.2973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research is to take a closer and explicit look at the position of believers in the Constitutional Court's decision through synchronizing the existence or existence of believers in Yogyakarta. In order to ensure whether or not these concerns are true, and to what extent are the rights and positions guaranteed in the decision of the Constitutional Court, and what is the position of believers in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 97/PUUXIV/2016 concerning Population administration in terms of perspective (Maqāṣid ash-Syarī‘ah). The type of legal research used in the preparation of this research is field research, which is conducting direct observations with in-depth interviews with sources that have been determined based on the researcher's knowledge using the purposive sampling method. The approach used in this research is normative juridical (Statute Approach) and empirical or sociological juridical. The normative juridical approach is carried out by referring to the legal norms contained in the legislation, decisions and legal norms that exist in society. The results of the research show that the considerations of the judges of the Constitutional Court related to the Philosophical, Textual, and Sociological Legal Interpreters in deciding the case Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 concerning the review of the Population Administration Law, have fulfilled the basic rights of believers and provide justice to adherents of the sect. trust, then when viewed with the study of Human Rights the Constitutional Court's
宪法法院第97/Puu-Xiv/2016号关于人口管理的关于信徒权利和地位的决定分析
研究是通过同步日惹的信仰者的存在或存在,对信仰者在宪法法院判决中的立场进行更密切和明确的考察。为了确保这些担忧是否属实,宪法法院的判决在多大程度上保障了权利和立场,以及从角度来看,宪法法院关于人口管理的第97/PUUXIV/2016号判决的信仰者的立场是什么(Maqāṣid ash- syar' ah)。在本研究的准备工作中使用的法律研究类型是实地研究,这是通过深入访谈的来源进行直接观察,这些来源是根据研究人员的知识确定的,使用有目的的抽样方法。本研究使用的方法是规范法(法规法)和实证法或社会学法。规范性司法途径是参照社会上存在的立法、决定和法律规范所包含的法律规范来实施的。研究结果表明,宪法法院法官在审理《人口管理法》复审案第97/PUU-XIV/2016号案件时,考虑到哲学、文本和社会学法律解释者,实现了信教者的基本权利,为信教者提供了正义;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信