Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of structural concrete containing RCA treated with sodium metasilicate

IF 2.6 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shubham Bansal, Lokesh Choudhary, Megha Kalra, Niragi Dave, Anil Kumar Sharma
{"title":"Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of structural concrete containing RCA treated with sodium metasilicate","authors":"Shubham Bansal, Lokesh Choudhary, Megha Kalra, Niragi Dave, Anil Kumar Sharma","doi":"10.1108/jedt-03-2023-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose One of the most contested and anticipated research issues is the acceptability of using recycled aggregates instead of fresh aggregates. This study aims to look at the possibility of replacing fresh aggregates with 15%, 30%, 60% and 100% recycled aggregates. Design/methodology/approach The research is divided into two stages. The compressive, split tensile, flexural and bond strength of the various mixes were examined in the first phase using untreated recycled concrete aggregates (RCA). The second phase entails chemically treating RCA with a 10% 0.1 M sodium metasilicate solution to evaluate differences in strength, indicating the success of the treatment performed. Microstructural experiments such as scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction were also conducted to evaluate the formation of interfacial transition zone (ITZ) in treated and untreated RCA specimens. Findings The observed findings reveal a decrease in concrete strength with increasing RCA concentration; however, when treated RCA was used, the strengths increased significantly when compared to untreated samples. The findings also include curves indicating the correlation between compressive strength and other mechanical strength parameters for an optimum mix of concrete prepared with 30% RCA replacement. Originality/value The study through its novel approach, demonstrates the effect of pretreatment of RCA in the absence of any standardized chemical treatment methodology and presents significant potential in minimizing reliance on fresh aggregates used in concrete, lowering building costs and promoting the use of waste materials in construction.","PeriodicalId":46533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Design and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-03-2023-0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose One of the most contested and anticipated research issues is the acceptability of using recycled aggregates instead of fresh aggregates. This study aims to look at the possibility of replacing fresh aggregates with 15%, 30%, 60% and 100% recycled aggregates. Design/methodology/approach The research is divided into two stages. The compressive, split tensile, flexural and bond strength of the various mixes were examined in the first phase using untreated recycled concrete aggregates (RCA). The second phase entails chemically treating RCA with a 10% 0.1 M sodium metasilicate solution to evaluate differences in strength, indicating the success of the treatment performed. Microstructural experiments such as scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction were also conducted to evaluate the formation of interfacial transition zone (ITZ) in treated and untreated RCA specimens. Findings The observed findings reveal a decrease in concrete strength with increasing RCA concentration; however, when treated RCA was used, the strengths increased significantly when compared to untreated samples. The findings also include curves indicating the correlation between compressive strength and other mechanical strength parameters for an optimum mix of concrete prepared with 30% RCA replacement. Originality/value The study through its novel approach, demonstrates the effect of pretreatment of RCA in the absence of any standardized chemical treatment methodology and presents significant potential in minimizing reliance on fresh aggregates used in concrete, lowering building costs and promoting the use of waste materials in construction.
偏硅酸钠处理含RCA结构混凝土的力学和微观结构特性
使用再生骨料代替新鲜骨料的可接受性是最具争议和最值得期待的研究问题之一。本研究旨在探讨用15%、30%、60%和100%的再生骨料替代新鲜骨料的可能性。本研究分为两个阶段。在第一阶段,使用未经处理的再生混凝土骨料(RCA)测试了各种混合料的压缩、劈裂拉伸、弯曲和粘结强度。第二阶段需要用10%的0.1 M偏硅酸钠溶液对RCA进行化学处理,以评估强度的差异,表明处理的成功。通过扫描电镜和x射线衍射等显微结构实验来评价处理和未处理的RCA样品中界面过渡区(ITZ)的形成。观察结果表明,混凝土强度随RCA浓度的增加而降低;然而,当使用处理过的RCA时,与未处理的样品相比,强度显着增加。研究结果还包括曲线,表明抗压强度和其他机械强度参数与30% RCA替代品配制的最佳混凝土配合比之间的相关性。独创性/价值该研究通过其新颖的方法,证明了在没有任何标准化化学处理方法的情况下,RCA预处理的效果,并在最大限度地减少对混凝土中使用的新骨料的依赖、降低建筑成本和促进建筑中废物的使用方面显示了巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: - Design strategies - Usability and adaptability - Material, component and systems performance - Process control - Alternative and new technologies - Organizational, management and research issues - Human factors - Environmental, quality and health and safety issues - Cost and life cycle issues - Sustainability criteria, indicators, measurement and practices - Risk management - Entrepreneurship Law, regulation and governance - Design, implementing, managing and practicing innovation - Visualization, simulation, information and communication technologies - Education practices, innovation, strategies and policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信