ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IMPACTS OF IMPROPER DISPOSAL OF DOMESTIC PHARMACEUTICAL WASTE IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH

Siti Hajar Mahamad Dom, Hisyam Abdul Hamid, Janattul Ain Jamal, Ahmad Fauzi Dali, Kamaliah Md Saman, Norkasihan Ibrahim
{"title":"ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY IMPACTS OF IMPROPER DISPOSAL OF DOMESTIC PHARMACEUTICAL WASTE IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH","authors":"Siti Hajar Mahamad Dom, Hisyam Abdul Hamid, Janattul Ain Jamal, Ahmad Fauzi Dali, Kamaliah Md Saman, Norkasihan Ibrahim","doi":"10.17576/ebangi.2023.2004.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improper pharmaceutical waste disposal is a rising environmental pollutant around the world. Pharmaceutical waste disposal legislation and regulations are available to some extent but limited to industrial premises and health-care institutions. Information on the disposal of pharmaceutical waste in public hands, known as domestic pharmaceutical waste (DPW), is limited. This scoping review aims to comprehend the global practice of DPW disposal by following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Three online databases were searched for eligible articles: peer-reviewed in English language, describing the methods that the public disposed of unwanted or expired pharmaceuticals at home (DPW Disposal) and the public’s participation in their local DPW programs (DPW Program). Search terms were derived from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free text when applicable. One expert report and thirty research publications were analysed. The articles originated from Asia (n=13), the Middle East (n=6), Africa (n=4), Europe (n=3), the United States (n=3) and Australia (n=1). Most pharmaceuticals are disposed of as household garbage (58.8%), returned to health facilities (17.9%) and flushed down the toilet drain (8.1%). There is a large range of diversity in public awareness (range: 14% - 82%) and participation in DPW Programs (range: 8.3% to 64%) with higher percentages reported from European countries. Existing regulations and policies have modest to moderate impact on proper DPW disposal. Our findings provide new information that may be utilised by policymakers in the process of laying the groundwork for a national plan outlining the most effective methods for disposing of DPW.","PeriodicalId":492362,"journal":{"name":"e-Bangi Journal of social science and humanities","volume":"139 S252","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Bangi Journal of social science and humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/ebangi.2023.2004.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improper pharmaceutical waste disposal is a rising environmental pollutant around the world. Pharmaceutical waste disposal legislation and regulations are available to some extent but limited to industrial premises and health-care institutions. Information on the disposal of pharmaceutical waste in public hands, known as domestic pharmaceutical waste (DPW), is limited. This scoping review aims to comprehend the global practice of DPW disposal by following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Three online databases were searched for eligible articles: peer-reviewed in English language, describing the methods that the public disposed of unwanted or expired pharmaceuticals at home (DPW Disposal) and the public’s participation in their local DPW programs (DPW Program). Search terms were derived from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free text when applicable. One expert report and thirty research publications were analysed. The articles originated from Asia (n=13), the Middle East (n=6), Africa (n=4), Europe (n=3), the United States (n=3) and Australia (n=1). Most pharmaceuticals are disposed of as household garbage (58.8%), returned to health facilities (17.9%) and flushed down the toilet drain (8.1%). There is a large range of diversity in public awareness (range: 14% - 82%) and participation in DPW Programs (range: 8.3% to 64%) with higher percentages reported from European countries. Existing regulations and policies have modest to moderate impact on proper DPW disposal. Our findings provide new information that may be utilised by policymakers in the process of laying the groundwork for a national plan outlining the most effective methods for disposing of DPW.
发展中国家国内药品废物处置不当对环境可持续性的影响
医药废弃物处置不当是世界范围内日益严重的环境污染问题。制药废物处理立法和条例在一定程度上是可行的,但仅限于工业场所和保健机构。关于在公众手中处置药品废物(即生活药品废物)的信息有限。本范围审查旨在通过遵循PRISMA范围审查扩展指南来理解DPW处置的全球实践。在三个在线数据库中搜索符合条件的文章:同行评审的英文文章,描述公众在家中处理不需要或过期药物的方法(DPW处置)和公众参与当地DPW计划(DPW计划)。搜索词来源于医学主题标题(MeSH)和适用时的自由文本。分析了一份专家报告和30份研究出版物。这些文章分别来自亚洲(n=13)、中东(n=6)、非洲(n=4)、欧洲(n=3)、美国(n=3)和澳大利亚(n=1)。大多数药品作为生活垃圾处理(58.8%)、送回卫生设施(17.9%)和冲入厕所排水管(8.1%)。在公众意识(范围:14% - 82%)和参与DPW计划(范围:8.3% - 64%)方面存在很大差异,其中欧洲国家的比例较高。现有的法规和政策对污水处理的适当处置只有轻微到中等的影响。我们的发现提供了新的信息,决策者可以利用这些信息为制定国家计划奠定基础,概述处置DPW的最有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信