Controlling The Amendment Of The Nri Constitution And The Necessary Of The President's Service For Three Periods

Irmanjaya Irmanjaya
{"title":"Controlling The Amendment Of The Nri Constitution And The Necessary Of The President's Service For Three Periods","authors":"Irmanjaya Irmanjaya","doi":"10.31941/pj.v22i1.2532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<em>The constitution in Indonesia has undergone several changes since Indonesia's independence. In this dynamic, Indonesia is in the phase of finding its identity and the right government system in accordance with the conditions of the Indonesian nation. Changes to the constitution repeatedly, namely in the Post-Independence period, the 1945 KRIS, the 1950 Constitution, the New Order, the Old Order, and the Reformation. Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that the President governs for a term of five years and can be re-elected in the election of the head of state. However, until the New Order era, the presidential term limit was not determined. Resulting in abuse of power and political chaos. The post-amendment reform era changed Article 7 by limiting the president's power to only two terms. The amendment to Article 7 is referred to as the embodiment of reform and is in accordance with the opinion of the Indonesian people so that power regeneration can occur. The discourse on the third amendment in Article 7 is pro and contra because it is planned that there will be a change in the limitation of the presidential term of office to three periods. This discourse is not in accordance with the spirit of Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the controversy among the Indonesian people. The Indonesian people hope that the abuse of power will not repeat itself as in the pre-reform era and stick to the mandate of Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia that the president is limited to two terms.</em>","PeriodicalId":471669,"journal":{"name":"Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum (edisi elektronik)","volume":"480 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum (edisi elektronik)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i1.2532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The constitution in Indonesia has undergone several changes since Indonesia's independence. In this dynamic, Indonesia is in the phase of finding its identity and the right government system in accordance with the conditions of the Indonesian nation. Changes to the constitution repeatedly, namely in the Post-Independence period, the 1945 KRIS, the 1950 Constitution, the New Order, the Old Order, and the Reformation. Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that the President governs for a term of five years and can be re-elected in the election of the head of state. However, until the New Order era, the presidential term limit was not determined. Resulting in abuse of power and political chaos. The post-amendment reform era changed Article 7 by limiting the president's power to only two terms. The amendment to Article 7 is referred to as the embodiment of reform and is in accordance with the opinion of the Indonesian people so that power regeneration can occur. The discourse on the third amendment in Article 7 is pro and contra because it is planned that there will be a change in the limitation of the presidential term of office to three periods. This discourse is not in accordance with the spirit of Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the controversy among the Indonesian people. The Indonesian people hope that the abuse of power will not repeat itself as in the pre-reform era and stick to the mandate of Article 7 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia that the president is limited to two terms.
控制修改宪法与三届总统服务的必要性
自印尼独立以来,印尼宪法经历了几次修改。在这种动态中,印度尼西亚正处于根据印度尼西亚民族的情况寻找其特性和正确的政府制度的阶段。多次修改宪法,分别是独立后时期、1945年宪法、1950年宪法、新秩序、旧秩序和宗教改革。1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第7条规定,总统任期五年,可在国家元首选举中连任。但是,直到新秩序时代,总统的任期限制才被确定。导致滥用权力和政治混乱。修改后的改革时代改变了第7条,将总统的权力限制为两届。对第7条的修正案被称为改革的体现,符合印度尼西亚人民的意见,以便实现权力再生。第7条第3修正案的内容是赞成和反对,因为计划将总统任期限制改为3届。这种说法不符合1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第7条的精神,也不符合印度尼西亚人民之间的争议。印尼人民希望,滥用权力的情况不会像改革前那样重演,并坚持1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》第7条的规定,即总统不得连任两届。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信