Diet selection in the Coyote Canis latrans

IF 1.5 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Matt W Hayward, Carl D Mitchell, Jan F Kamler, Paul Rippon, David R Heit, Vilis Nams, Robert A Montgomery
{"title":"Diet selection in the Coyote <i>Canis latrans</i>","authors":"Matt W Hayward, Carl D Mitchell, Jan F Kamler, Paul Rippon, David R Heit, Vilis Nams, Robert A Montgomery","doi":"10.1093/jmammal/gyad094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Coyote (Canis latrans) is one of the most studied species in North America with at least 445 papers on its diet alone. While this research has yielded excellent reviews of what coyotes eat, it has been inadequate to draw deeper conclusions because no synthesis to date has considered prey availability. We accounted for prey availability by investigating the prey selection of coyotes across its distribution using the traditional Jacobs’ index method, as well as the new iterative preference averaging (IPA) method on scats and biomass. We found that coyotes selected for Dall’s Sheep (Ovis dalli), White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Eastern Cottontail Rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), and California Vole (Microtus californicus), which yielded a predator-to-preferred prey mass ratio of 1:2. We also found that coyotes avoided preying on other small mammals, including carnivorans and arboreal species. There was strong concordance between the traditional and IPA method on scats, but this pattern was weakened when biomass was considered. General linear models revealed that coyotes preferred to prey upon larger species that were riskier to hunt, reflecting their ability to hunt in groups, and were least likely to hunt solitary species. Coyotes increasingly selected Mule Deer (O. hemionus) and Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) at higher latitudes, whereas Black-tailed Jackrabbit (L. californicus) were increasingly selected toward the tropics. Mule Deer were increasingly selected at higher coyote densities, while Black-tailed Jackrabbit were increasingly avoided at higher coyote densities. Coyote predation could constrain the realized niche of prey species at the distributional limits of the predator through their increased efficiency of predation reflected in increased prey selection values. These results are integral to improved understandings of Coyote ecology and can inform predictive analyses allowing for spatial variation, which ultimately will lead to better understandings about the ecological role of the coyote across different ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":50157,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mammalogy","volume":"59 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mammalogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyad094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The Coyote (Canis latrans) is one of the most studied species in North America with at least 445 papers on its diet alone. While this research has yielded excellent reviews of what coyotes eat, it has been inadequate to draw deeper conclusions because no synthesis to date has considered prey availability. We accounted for prey availability by investigating the prey selection of coyotes across its distribution using the traditional Jacobs’ index method, as well as the new iterative preference averaging (IPA) method on scats and biomass. We found that coyotes selected for Dall’s Sheep (Ovis dalli), White-tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Eastern Cottontail Rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), and California Vole (Microtus californicus), which yielded a predator-to-preferred prey mass ratio of 1:2. We also found that coyotes avoided preying on other small mammals, including carnivorans and arboreal species. There was strong concordance between the traditional and IPA method on scats, but this pattern was weakened when biomass was considered. General linear models revealed that coyotes preferred to prey upon larger species that were riskier to hunt, reflecting their ability to hunt in groups, and were least likely to hunt solitary species. Coyotes increasingly selected Mule Deer (O. hemionus) and Snowshoe Hare (Lepus americanus) at higher latitudes, whereas Black-tailed Jackrabbit (L. californicus) were increasingly selected toward the tropics. Mule Deer were increasingly selected at higher coyote densities, while Black-tailed Jackrabbit were increasingly avoided at higher coyote densities. Coyote predation could constrain the realized niche of prey species at the distributional limits of the predator through their increased efficiency of predation reflected in increased prey selection values. These results are integral to improved understandings of Coyote ecology and can inform predictive analyses allowing for spatial variation, which ultimately will lead to better understandings about the ecological role of the coyote across different ecosystems.
土狼犬茅厕的饮食选择
土狼(Canis latrans)是北美研究最多的物种之一,仅关于其饮食的论文就至少有445篇。虽然这项研究对土狼吃什么做出了很好的评论,但它还不足以得出更深入的结论,因为迄今为止还没有综合考虑猎物的可用性。本文采用传统的Jacobs指数法和新的基于粪便和生物量的迭代偏好平均(IPA)方法,研究了土狼在其分布范围内的猎物选择,从而解释了猎物的可用性。结果表明,土狼选择了大白羊(Ovis dalli)、白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)、东部棉尾兔(Sylvilagus floridanus)和加州田鼠(Microtus californicus),其捕食者与首选猎物的质量比为1:2。我们还发现土狼避免捕食其他小型哺乳动物,包括食肉动物和树栖动物。传统方法与IPA方法在粪渣上的一致性较强,但当考虑生物量时,这种模式被削弱。一般线性模型显示,土狼更喜欢捕食更大的、更危险的物种,这反映了它们群体狩猎的能力,而最不可能捕食单独的物种。土狼在高纬度地区越来越多地选择骡鹿(O. hemionus)和雪鞋兔(Lepus americanus),而在热带地区越来越多地选择黑尾大野兔(L. californicus)。在较高的土狼密度下,人们越来越多地选择骡鹿,而在较高的土狼密度下,人们越来越多地避免黑尾大野兔。土狼通过提高捕食效率,增加猎物选择值,从而限制了捕食者在其分布极限上实现的猎物生态位。这些结果对于提高对土狼生态学的理解是不可或缺的,并且可以为考虑空间变化的预测分析提供信息,最终将更好地理解土狼在不同生态系统中的生态作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mammalogy
Journal of Mammalogy 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
106
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Papers are published on mammalian behavior, conservation, ecology, genetics, morphology, physiology, and taxonomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信