“Extraordinary powers for extraordinary times”: A conjunctural analysis of pandemic policing, common sense, and the abolitionist horizon

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Andrew Brooks, Astrid Lorange
{"title":"“Extraordinary powers for extraordinary times”: A conjunctural analysis of pandemic policing, common sense, and the abolitionist horizon","authors":"Andrew Brooks, Astrid Lorange","doi":"10.1177/17416590231205901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we offer a conjunctural analysis of policing and incarceration, examining their expansion in relation to structural economic conditions over the last 50 years and interrogating how the sudden onset of the Covid-19 pandemic enabled extraordinary growth in policing powers in the Australian jurisdictions of New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria (VIC). We examine how popular support for police-led responses to crisis and fines as a common-sense solution to social problems were sought during the period that the Public Health Orders were in effect in the two states. We argue that the discursive project of naturalizing the police-led response to the pandemic—via official communications from the state governments as well as media coverage of the pandemic—attempts to further entrench a vision of law and order governance in which infrastructures of discipline and punishment are necessary and inevitable. We identify this vision as a direct barrier to abolition and a significant limit on the capacity to imagine alternative frameworks for justice. We end by considering a small archive of tweets from users in NSW and VIC published on the social media platform formerly known as Twitter (now called X) in 2020–21. We argue that this archive registers the way the common-sense status of the fine as an efficient, effective, and equitable punishment gives way to punitive fantasies about police and prisons. We read this archive alongside the broad refusal to pay Covid-related fines and the ongoing legal disputes contesting the legitimacy of their issuance, concluding by proposing that the conjunctural moment of the Covid-19 pandemic has given rise to unresolved contradictions between the naturalized logic of law and order crisis management and the potential for this logic to come undone.","PeriodicalId":46658,"journal":{"name":"Crime Media Culture","volume":"10 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crime Media Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590231205901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we offer a conjunctural analysis of policing and incarceration, examining their expansion in relation to structural economic conditions over the last 50 years and interrogating how the sudden onset of the Covid-19 pandemic enabled extraordinary growth in policing powers in the Australian jurisdictions of New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria (VIC). We examine how popular support for police-led responses to crisis and fines as a common-sense solution to social problems were sought during the period that the Public Health Orders were in effect in the two states. We argue that the discursive project of naturalizing the police-led response to the pandemic—via official communications from the state governments as well as media coverage of the pandemic—attempts to further entrench a vision of law and order governance in which infrastructures of discipline and punishment are necessary and inevitable. We identify this vision as a direct barrier to abolition and a significant limit on the capacity to imagine alternative frameworks for justice. We end by considering a small archive of tweets from users in NSW and VIC published on the social media platform formerly known as Twitter (now called X) in 2020–21. We argue that this archive registers the way the common-sense status of the fine as an efficient, effective, and equitable punishment gives way to punitive fantasies about police and prisons. We read this archive alongside the broad refusal to pay Covid-related fines and the ongoing legal disputes contesting the legitimacy of their issuance, concluding by proposing that the conjunctural moment of the Covid-19 pandemic has given rise to unresolved contradictions between the naturalized logic of law and order crisis management and the potential for this logic to come undone.
“非凡的力量,非凡的时代”:对流行病监管、常识和废除主义视野的综合分析
在本文中,我们对警务和监禁进行了行情分析,考察了过去50年来与结构性经济条件相关的警务和监禁扩张,并探讨了2019冠状病毒病大流行的突然爆发如何使澳大利亚新南威尔士州(NSW)和维多利亚州(VIC)的司法管辖区警务权力大幅增长。我们研究了在《公共卫生令》在这两个州生效期间,如何寻求公众对警察主导的危机应对和罚款作为社会问题的常识性解决方案的支持。我们认为,通过州政府的官方沟通以及媒体对流行病的报道,将警察主导的应对措施自然化的话语项目,试图进一步巩固一种法律和秩序治理的愿景,在这种愿景中,纪律和惩罚的基础设施是必要的和不可避免的。我们认为这一设想是废除死刑的直接障碍,是对设想其他司法框架的能力的重大限制。最后,我们考虑了新南威尔士州和维多利亚州用户在2020-21年期间在社交媒体平台上发布的推文的一小部分存档,该平台以前称为Twitter(现在称为X)。我们认为,这份档案记录了罚金作为一种高效、有效和公平的惩罚的常识性地位是如何让位于对警察和监狱的惩罚性幻想的。我们在阅读这份档案的同时,还看到了各方普遍拒绝支付与新冠肺炎相关的罚款,以及质疑罚款合法性的持续法律纠纷。最后,我们提出,新冠肺炎大流行的关键时刻,在法律和秩序危机管理的归化逻辑与这一逻辑被撤销的可能性之间,产生了尚未解决的矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Crime, Media, Culture is a fully peer reviewed, international journal providing the primary vehicle for exchange between scholars who are working at the intersections of criminological and cultural inquiry. It promotes a broad cross-disciplinary understanding of the relationship between crime, criminal justice, media and culture. The journal invites papers in three broad substantive areas: * The relationship between crime, criminal justice and media forms * The relationship between criminal justice and cultural dynamics * The intersections of crime, criminal justice, media forms and cultural dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信