Quality of Fortified Zea Mays L (Maize) and Triticum Durum (Wheat) Flours

Abel Alberto Massingue Júnior, Bernabé Bernardo Massie, Francisco José Luís Sigauque, Anastância Amadeu Dimande, Gessica Dalberty Fernandes
{"title":"Quality of Fortified Zea Mays L (Maize) and Triticum Durum (Wheat) Flours","authors":"Abel Alberto Massingue Júnior, Bernabé Bernardo Massie, Francisco José Luís Sigauque, Anastância Amadeu Dimande, Gessica Dalberty Fernandes","doi":"10.54536/ajfst.v2i2.1997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maize flour is obtained through the milling process and contributes about 20% energy and 15% protein. wheat flour is rich in starch (70 to75%), water (12 to 14%), protein (8 to16%), a small portion of non-starch polysaccharides (2 to 3%), lipids (2%) and ash (1%). This study aimed to evaluate the centesimal quality of maize and wheat flour. 8 samples of flour were evaluated, being 2 ((First Choice and Mpupu) and 6 of wheat flour (Faspão, Babita, Xiluva, Eagle, Pasta and Ntombi)). Moisture by loss on dissection at 105°C, ash by incineration, fat by goldfish method, protein by biuret method, fulling number by reading on mininfra grain analyzer Scan-T, gluten, wet and dry by glutomatic system, gluten index by centrifugation and fiber by enzymatic-gravimetric method were determined as quality parameters. The results showed fat content 0.61 to 1.59%, moisture 13.3 and 13.4%, fiber 0.22 to 0.38% and protein around 5.99 to 7.09% for the corn flours. Moisture ranging from 13.6 to 13.8%, protein from 10.30 to 11.22%, ash from 0.50 to 0.70%, water absorption from 58.23 to 59.73%, falling number 276 to 354s, gluten around 24 to 29.1%, gluten index from 0 to 95%, wet gluten from 28.46 to 29.80 and dry gluten ranging from 9.36 to 10.50%. No significant differences were observed among the wheat flour samples for moisture, protein, ash, water absorption and wet gluten. Significant differences were found for falling number (FN), gluten and dry gluten. There was sufficient evidence of compliance with the flour quality criteria.","PeriodicalId":7550,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Food Science and Technology","volume":"8 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54536/ajfst.v2i2.1997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maize flour is obtained through the milling process and contributes about 20% energy and 15% protein. wheat flour is rich in starch (70 to75%), water (12 to 14%), protein (8 to16%), a small portion of non-starch polysaccharides (2 to 3%), lipids (2%) and ash (1%). This study aimed to evaluate the centesimal quality of maize and wheat flour. 8 samples of flour were evaluated, being 2 ((First Choice and Mpupu) and 6 of wheat flour (Faspão, Babita, Xiluva, Eagle, Pasta and Ntombi)). Moisture by loss on dissection at 105°C, ash by incineration, fat by goldfish method, protein by biuret method, fulling number by reading on mininfra grain analyzer Scan-T, gluten, wet and dry by glutomatic system, gluten index by centrifugation and fiber by enzymatic-gravimetric method were determined as quality parameters. The results showed fat content 0.61 to 1.59%, moisture 13.3 and 13.4%, fiber 0.22 to 0.38% and protein around 5.99 to 7.09% for the corn flours. Moisture ranging from 13.6 to 13.8%, protein from 10.30 to 11.22%, ash from 0.50 to 0.70%, water absorption from 58.23 to 59.73%, falling number 276 to 354s, gluten around 24 to 29.1%, gluten index from 0 to 95%, wet gluten from 28.46 to 29.80 and dry gluten ranging from 9.36 to 10.50%. No significant differences were observed among the wheat flour samples for moisture, protein, ash, water absorption and wet gluten. Significant differences were found for falling number (FN), gluten and dry gluten. There was sufficient evidence of compliance with the flour quality criteria.
强化玉米粉和小麦粉的品质
玉米粉通过碾磨过程获得,提供约20%的能量和15%的蛋白质。小麦粉富含淀粉(70 - 75%)、水(12 - 14%)、蛋白质(8 - 16%)、少量非淀粉多糖(2 - 3%)、脂质(2%)和灰分(1%)。本研究旨在评价玉米和小麦粉的百分品质。对8个面粉样品进行了评价,其中2个(First Choice和Mpupu)和6个小麦粉(fasp、Babita、Xiluva、Eagle、Pasta和Ntombi)。测定105℃解剖损失水分、焚烧灰分、金鱼法脂肪、双缩脲法蛋白质、mininfra谷物分析仪Scan-T读取填充数、谷蛋白、干湿法谷蛋白、离心法谷蛋白指数、酶重法纤维等质量参数。结果表明,玉米粉的脂肪含量为0.61 ~ 1.59%,水分含量为13.3 ~ 13.4%,纤维含量为0.22 ~ 0.38%,蛋白质含量为5.99 ~ 7.09%。水分13.6 ~ 13.8%,蛋白质10.30 ~ 11.22%,灰分0.50 ~ 0.70%,吸水率58.23 ~ 59.73%,下降数276 ~ 354,面筋24 ~ 29.1%,面筋指数0 ~ 95%,湿面筋28.46 ~ 29.80,干面筋9.36 ~ 10.50%。小麦面粉样品的水分、蛋白质、灰分、吸水率和湿面筋均无显著差异。落数(FN)、面筋和干面筋差异显著。有足够的证据证明符合面粉质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信