Water as a European shared public good: The legal status of a vital resource, and its sui generis community property regime

Q2 Social Sciences
Antonio Di Marco
{"title":"Water as a European shared public good: The legal status of a vital resource, and its <i>sui generis</i> community property regime","authors":"Antonio Di Marco","doi":"10.1177/1023263x231200961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water is generally indicated as a public good that is essential for life. Within the Union water law, this emphatic qualification appears as a generic political declaration linked to the uncertain recognition of the right to water. By analysing the common private and public interests, this study argues that the restricted territorial sovereignty's theory, widely accepted for transboundary water resources, should be applied to all water resources. Water would be a shared European public good, subject to a sui generis community of property regime limiting the sovereignty of Member States over their water resources. By investigating the coherence of this community of property regime with the principle of neutrality enshrined in Article 345 TFEU, the essay suggests that the regulation of the water services would be drawn into the scope of the Treaties because of their instrumental nature in guaranteeing the exercise of fundamental rights, the social cohesion of the Union and the protection of a common public good. The idea is put forward that water services would be an emblematic case of European public services, understood as a specific development of the concept of service of general economic interest, instrumental to the implementation of the European model of society.","PeriodicalId":39672,"journal":{"name":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","volume":"331 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x231200961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water is generally indicated as a public good that is essential for life. Within the Union water law, this emphatic qualification appears as a generic political declaration linked to the uncertain recognition of the right to water. By analysing the common private and public interests, this study argues that the restricted territorial sovereignty's theory, widely accepted for transboundary water resources, should be applied to all water resources. Water would be a shared European public good, subject to a sui generis community of property regime limiting the sovereignty of Member States over their water resources. By investigating the coherence of this community of property regime with the principle of neutrality enshrined in Article 345 TFEU, the essay suggests that the regulation of the water services would be drawn into the scope of the Treaties because of their instrumental nature in guaranteeing the exercise of fundamental rights, the social cohesion of the Union and the protection of a common public good. The idea is put forward that water services would be an emblematic case of European public services, understood as a specific development of the concept of service of general economic interest, instrumental to the implementation of the European model of society.
水作为欧洲共享的公共产品:一种重要资源的法律地位及其独特的公共财产制度
水通常被认为是生命所必需的公共物品。在欧盟水法中,这一强调的限定似乎是一种一般性的政治宣言,与对水权的不确定承认有关。通过对共同的私人利益和公共利益的分析,本文认为在跨境水资源中被广泛接受的有限领土主权理论应该适用于所有的水资源。水将是欧洲共同的公共利益,受限于一种独特的财产共同体制度,限制会员国对其水资源的主权。通过调查这一财产共同体制度与TFEU第345条所载的中立原则的一致性,本文认为,对供水服务的监管将被纳入条约的范围,因为它们在保证行使基本权利、欧盟的社会凝聚力和保护共同公共利益方面具有工具性。有人提出,供水服务将是欧洲公共服务的一个象征性案例,被理解为具有普遍经济利益的服务概念的具体发展,有助于实施欧洲社会模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信