Section 19 Conferencing in the Canadian Youth Criminal Justice System

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Emma R. Giberson, Brooke Tracy, Laura Kabbash, Scott T. Ronis, Mary Ann Campbell, Lena Gryshchuk
{"title":"Section 19 Conferencing in the Canadian Youth Criminal Justice System","authors":"Emma R. Giberson, Brooke Tracy, Laura Kabbash, Scott T. Ronis, Mary Ann Campbell, Lena Gryshchuk","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2022-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under the authority of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), Section 19 conferences aim to bring together relevant professionals to discuss diversionary and rehabilitation options for Canadian youth involved in the justice system. However, these options’ use and process has not been examined at the local level where practices may vary from the national vision. To offer insight into their use and processes, the current study used semi-structured qualitative interviews with 40 service providers engaged in Section 19 conferences in New Brunswick, Canada. Although there was perceived value in these conferences (i.e., youth involvement in the process, the sharing of expertise, and collaborative planning across systems), weaknesses in conference processes also were observed (i.e., systemic disorganization, inconsistency in communication and collaboration, concern about effectiveness, and limited resources and support for youth). These findings are discussed in terms of challenges that key stakeholders face in Section 19 conferences that may influence their impact, as well as considerations for areas of improvement in conferencing processes to enhance their value. Overall, Section 19 conferences should be utilized more often, which may be best achieved by clarifying the operational procedures and roles of participants, including elucidating how they can best leverage the roles of stakeholders to service the goals of effective diversion and rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":46586,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2022-0044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under the authority of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA), Section 19 conferences aim to bring together relevant professionals to discuss diversionary and rehabilitation options for Canadian youth involved in the justice system. However, these options’ use and process has not been examined at the local level where practices may vary from the national vision. To offer insight into their use and processes, the current study used semi-structured qualitative interviews with 40 service providers engaged in Section 19 conferences in New Brunswick, Canada. Although there was perceived value in these conferences (i.e., youth involvement in the process, the sharing of expertise, and collaborative planning across systems), weaknesses in conference processes also were observed (i.e., systemic disorganization, inconsistency in communication and collaboration, concern about effectiveness, and limited resources and support for youth). These findings are discussed in terms of challenges that key stakeholders face in Section 19 conferences that may influence their impact, as well as considerations for areas of improvement in conferencing processes to enhance their value. Overall, Section 19 conferences should be utilized more often, which may be best achieved by clarifying the operational procedures and roles of participants, including elucidating how they can best leverage the roles of stakeholders to service the goals of effective diversion and rehabilitation.
第19节加拿大青年刑事司法系统中的会议
根据《青年刑事司法法》的授权,第19节会议旨在汇集有关专业人员,讨论涉及司法系统的加拿大青年的转移和康复方案。但是,这些选择的使用和过程尚未在地方一级进行审查,因为地方一级的做法可能与国家的设想不同。为了深入了解他们的使用和过程,目前的研究使用了半结构化的定性访谈,与加拿大新不伦瑞克省参加第19节会议的40家服务提供商进行了访谈。虽然在这些会议中有感知到的价值(即,青年参与过程,分享专业知识,跨系统协作规划),但也观察到会议过程中的弱点(即,系统混乱,沟通和协作的不一致,对有效性的关注,以及对青年的资源和支持有限)。这些调查结果将根据关键利益相关者在第19节会议中面临的可能影响其影响的挑战以及对会议流程改进领域的考虑进行讨论,以提高其价值。总的来说,应该更经常地利用第19款会议,最好的办法是澄清与会者的业务程序和作用,包括阐明他们如何能够最好地利用利益攸关方的作用,为有效转移和恢复的目标服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice publishes quarterly coverage of the theoretical and scientific aspects of the study of crime and the practical problems of law enforcement, administration of justice and the treatment of offenders, particularly in the Canadian context. Since 1958, this peer-reviewed journal has provided a forum for original contributions and discussions in the fields of criminology and criminal justice. This bilingual, peer-reviewed journal was previously called the Canadian Journal of Criminology, the Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, and the Canadian Journal of Corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信