GELİR DAĞILIMI ADALETSİZLİĞİNE ETKİ EDEN DEĞİŞKENLER ÜZERİNE PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Yeşim KUBAR, Yasemin ÇİÇEK
{"title":"GELİR DAĞILIMI ADALETSİZLİĞİNE ETKİ EDEN DEĞİŞKENLER ÜZERİNE PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ","authors":"Yeşim KUBAR, Yasemin ÇİÇEK","doi":"10.30520/tjsosci.1332143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Income distribution injustice is one of the serious and complex problems in development of a country. In a country, for economic development to spread over social basis, it is necessary for the gains en-gendered by growth to be shared with all society. Thanks to this, a country also provides economic growth as well as welfare increase. Spread of economic growth over social basis is closely related to a fair income distribution. In the study carried out, income distribution injustice is associated with Gini Coefficient. While that Gini Coefficient approaches zero means that country incomes are fairly dis-tributed to every sector of society, that it approaches to one expresses that incomes are collected in certain sectors and that income justice in that country becomes worse. In this study, utilizing the1990-2020 annual data of the countries such as USA, Brazil, Canada, Finland and United Kingdom, it was aimed to identify that income distribution injustice are affected from which of the variables such as employment rate, per capita income, fertility rate, urbanization and investment rate and how. As dependent variable of the study, Gini Coefficient was used. In the study, utilized panel data analysis, according to the results of long term PDOLS predictor analysis, it was concluded that an increase of one unit occurring in per capita income, gross capital formation (investment) and employment rate affected Gini Coefficient in positive direction, that fertility rate was insignificant, and that urbaniza-tion negatively affected it.","PeriodicalId":46877,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-The European Journal of Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30520/tjsosci.1332143","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Income distribution injustice is one of the serious and complex problems in development of a country. In a country, for economic development to spread over social basis, it is necessary for the gains en-gendered by growth to be shared with all society. Thanks to this, a country also provides economic growth as well as welfare increase. Spread of economic growth over social basis is closely related to a fair income distribution. In the study carried out, income distribution injustice is associated with Gini Coefficient. While that Gini Coefficient approaches zero means that country incomes are fairly dis-tributed to every sector of society, that it approaches to one expresses that incomes are collected in certain sectors and that income justice in that country becomes worse. In this study, utilizing the1990-2020 annual data of the countries such as USA, Brazil, Canada, Finland and United Kingdom, it was aimed to identify that income distribution injustice are affected from which of the variables such as employment rate, per capita income, fertility rate, urbanization and investment rate and how. As dependent variable of the study, Gini Coefficient was used. In the study, utilized panel data analysis, according to the results of long term PDOLS predictor analysis, it was concluded that an increase of one unit occurring in per capita income, gross capital formation (investment) and employment rate affected Gini Coefficient in positive direction, that fertility rate was insignificant, and that urbaniza-tion negatively affected it.
影响收入不平等变量的面板数据分析
收入分配不公是一个国家发展中严重而复杂的问题之一。在一个国家,要使经济发展遍及社会基础,就必须使增长所产生的收益为全社会所分享。因此,一个国家不仅能提高福利,还能促进经济增长。经济增长在社会基础上的分布与公平的收入分配密切相关。在进行的研究中,收入分配不公与基尼系数有关。基尼系数接近零意味着国家收入公平地分配到社会的每个部门,而基尼系数接近1则表明收入被某些部门收集,该国的收入正义变得更差。本研究利用美国、巴西、加拿大、芬兰和英国等国1990-2020年的年度数据,旨在确定收入分配不公是由就业率、人均收入、生育率、城市化和投资率等变量中的哪一个影响的,以及如何影响的。采用基尼系数作为研究的因变量。本研究采用面板数据分析,根据长期pols预测分析结果,得出人均收入、资本形成(投资)总额和就业率每增加1个单位对基尼系数的正向影响,生育率不显著,城市化对基尼系数的负向影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: European integration and enlargement pose fundamental challenges for policy, politics, citizenship, culture and democracy. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research provides a unique forum for discussing these processes. It welcomes articles on all aspects of European developments that contribute to the improvement of social science knowledge and to the setting of a policy-focused European research agenda. Examples of typical subject areas covered include •Policy-Making and Agenda-Setting •Multilevel Governance •The Role of Institutions •Democracy and Civil Society •Social Structures and Integration •Sustainability and Ecological Modernisation •Science, Research, Technology and Society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信