An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews for Chuna (or Tuina) Manual Therapy on Musculoskeletal Disorders

Doori Kim, Gil geun Baek, Byung-Cheul Shin
{"title":"An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews for Chuna (or Tuina) Manual Therapy on Musculoskeletal Disorders","authors":"Doori Kim, Gil geun Baek, Byung-Cheul Shin","doi":"10.56986/pim.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To provide clinicians with reliable evidence an umbrella review of systematic reviews (SRs) on Chuna manual therapy (CMT) for musculoskeletal disorders was performed to synthesize important outcomes.Methods: There were eight databases (Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CNKI, KMBASE, KISS, Scienceon, and OASIS) searched as well as the international database Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews in health and social care until August 2023. SRs of randomized controlled trials involving patients with musculoskeletal conditions, limited to interventions explicitly labeled as “Chuna” or “Tuina” in English, Chinese, or Korean language were retrieved. Two reviewers independently conducted selection and data extraction, and SR quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews tool (low, medium, or high quality).Results: This review included 32 SRs, categorized by cervical (<i>n</i> = 4), thoracolumbar (<i>n</i> = 7), upper extremity (<i>n</i> = 5), lower extremity (<i>n</i> = 9), and other musculoskeletal disorders (<i>n</i> = 7). Quality assessments determined that three SRs were of “high” quality, two were “low” quality, and the remaining SRs were of “medium” quality. CMT was consistently reported to demonstrate superior outcomes: an effective rate was observed in 17 of 19 SRs, CMT was effective at reducing pain in 12 of the 16 SRs, and functional outcomes of CMT were observed in 8 of 12 SRs. No serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion: CMT may be a safe and effective treatment for various musculoskeletal disorders based on the limited number of studies and the low quality of included SRs.","PeriodicalId":496637,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Integrative Medicine","volume":"2022 25","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56986/pim.2023.10.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To provide clinicians with reliable evidence an umbrella review of systematic reviews (SRs) on Chuna manual therapy (CMT) for musculoskeletal disorders was performed to synthesize important outcomes.Methods: There were eight databases (Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CNKI, KMBASE, KISS, Scienceon, and OASIS) searched as well as the international database Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews in health and social care until August 2023. SRs of randomized controlled trials involving patients with musculoskeletal conditions, limited to interventions explicitly labeled as “Chuna” or “Tuina” in English, Chinese, or Korean language were retrieved. Two reviewers independently conducted selection and data extraction, and SR quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews tool (low, medium, or high quality).Results: This review included 32 SRs, categorized by cervical (n = 4), thoracolumbar (n = 7), upper extremity (n = 5), lower extremity (n = 9), and other musculoskeletal disorders (n = 7). Quality assessments determined that three SRs were of “high” quality, two were “low” quality, and the remaining SRs were of “medium” quality. CMT was consistently reported to demonstrate superior outcomes: an effective rate was observed in 17 of 19 SRs, CMT was effective at reducing pain in 12 of the 16 SRs, and functional outcomes of CMT were observed in 8 of 12 SRs. No serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion: CMT may be a safe and effective treatment for various musculoskeletal disorders based on the limited number of studies and the low quality of included SRs.
推拿疗法治疗肌肉骨骼疾病系统综述综述
背景:为了给临床医生提供可靠的证据,我们对Chuna manual therapy (CMT)治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的系统评价(SRs)进行了全面的综述,以综合重要的结果。方法:检索截至2023年8月的8个数据库(Cochrane、EMBASE、MEDLINE、CNKI、KMBASE、KISS、Scienceon和OASIS)以及国际数据库《卫生与社会保健系统评价前瞻性注册》。检索了涉及肌肉骨骼疾病患者的随机对照试验的SRs,这些试验仅限于在英语、中文或韩语中明确标记为“Chuna”或“Tuina”的干预措施。两名审稿人独立进行选择和数据提取,使用A Measurement Tool to evaluate Systematic Reviews工具评估SR质量(低、中、高质量)。结果:本综述纳入32例SRs,按宫颈(<i>n</i>= 4),胸腰椎(<i>n</i>= 7),上肢(<i>n</i>= 5),下肢(<i>n</i>= 9),以及其他肌肉骨骼疾病(<i>n</i>= 7)。质量评估确定3个SRs为“高”质量,2个为“低”质量,其余SRs为“中等”质量。CMT一直被报道显示出优越的结果:19例SRs中有17例观察到有效率,16例SRs中有12例CMT有效减轻疼痛,12例SRs中有8例观察到CMT的功能结果。无严重不良事件报告。结论:基于研究数量有限和纳入的SRs质量较低,CMT可能是一种安全有效的治疗各种肌肉骨骼疾病的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信