Structural and Criterion Validity of a New 6-item Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-6) on Patients with Chronic Lower Back Pain Receiving Integrative Medicine

Yoon Jae Lee, Gyu Chan Shim, Changsop Yang, Chang-Hyun Han
{"title":"Structural and Criterion Validity of a New 6-item Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ-6) on Patients with Chronic Lower Back Pain Receiving Integrative Medicine","authors":"Yoon Jae Lee, Gyu Chan Shim, Changsop Yang, Chang-Hyun Han","doi":"10.56986/pim.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lower back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) has been widely used to assess functional impairment in patients with LBP. However, its length and redundancy calls for a more concise and optimized version.Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials comparing pharmacopuncture and physical therapy for chronic LBP. We focused on 132 patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms and analyzed their baseline data to evaluate the structural validity of the RMDQ. We used R packages lavaan and semPlot for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Model fit were assessed through various indices, including comparative fit index, Tucker–Lewis index, root mean square error of approximation, and standardized root mean squared residual.Results: A total of 18 items were ultimately removed to produce a streamlined 6-item structure. Our model met the fit index criteria, yielding a one-domain, 6-item RMDQ structure. While the relative indices fell slightly short of the ideal values, the RMDQ-6 derived through CFA correlated well with the original version.Conclusion: This study developed a more concise version of RMDQ through CFA to optimize its structural configuration. This concise instrument can be proposed as an efficient tool to assess the functionality of patients with LBP.","PeriodicalId":496637,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Integrative Medicine","volume":"2022 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56986/pim.2023.10.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lower back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. The Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) has been widely used to assess functional impairment in patients with LBP. However, its length and redundancy calls for a more concise and optimized version.Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials comparing pharmacopuncture and physical therapy for chronic LBP. We focused on 132 patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms and analyzed their baseline data to evaluate the structural validity of the RMDQ. We used R packages lavaan and semPlot for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Model fit were assessed through various indices, including comparative fit index, Tucker–Lewis index, root mean square error of approximation, and standardized root mean squared residual.Results: A total of 18 items were ultimately removed to produce a streamlined 6-item structure. Our model met the fit index criteria, yielding a one-domain, 6-item RMDQ structure. While the relative indices fell slightly short of the ideal values, the RMDQ-6 derived through CFA correlated well with the original version.Conclusion: This study developed a more concise version of RMDQ through CFA to optimize its structural configuration. This concise instrument can be proposed as an efficient tool to assess the functionality of patients with LBP.
罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ-6)对中西医结合治疗慢性腰痛患者的结构效度和标准效度分析
背景:腰痛(LBP)是全球致残的主要原因。罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)被广泛用于评估腰痛患者的功能损害。然而,它的长度和冗余需要一个更简洁和优化的版本。方法:我们对两项比较药物穿刺和物理治疗慢性腰痛的随机对照试验的数据进行了二次分析。我们集中研究了132例具有中重度症状的患者,并分析了他们的基线数据,以评估RMDQ的结构有效性。我们使用R软件包lavaan和semployet进行验证性因子分析(CFA)。通过比较拟合指数、Tucker-Lewis指数、近似均方根误差、标准化均方根残差等指标评价模型拟合。结果:总共18个项目最终被删除,产生一个精简的6个项目结构。我们的模型满足拟合指标标准,产生一个单域,6项RMDQ结构。虽然相关指标略低于理想值,但通过CFA推导的RMDQ-6与原始版本相关良好。结论:本研究通过CFA优化了RMDQ的结构配置,构建了一个更简洁的RMDQ版本。这种简洁的仪器可以作为评估腰痛患者功能的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信