Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire

IF 0.5 Q4 NURSING
Dongyang Wang, Thitipong Tankumpuan, Ketsarin Utriyaprasit, Patricia M. Davidson
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire","authors":"Dongyang Wang, Thitipong Tankumpuan, Ketsarin Utriyaprasit, Patricia M. Davidson","doi":"10.5812/jnms-139931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire (PAHCQ) is the latest specific tool used to evaluate patients' accessibility to the health system. Objectives: This study aimed to translate and verify the item analysis, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity, and known-group analysis of the PAHCQ in a Chinese population. Methods: This study developed and validated the Chinese version of the PAHCQ. The translation of the PAHCQ was based on the back translation of Brislin. This study used simple random sampling to include a sample of 591 subjects in Jiangsu, China. Item analysis was used to verify the questionnaire's expert consistency and cultural adaptation. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the structure. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's α, and item validity and test-retest reliability were analyzed. Results: The CFA results indicated that the modified PAHCQ is reasonable. The Cronbach alpha value of the PAHCQ was 0.96. The correlation coefficients for the six domains in test-retest reliability were between 0.67 and 0.91. Comparison of the total PAHCQ scores among participants in different groups of age, gender, maternal status, education level, per capita monthly income, and CCI levels showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The Chinese version of the PAHCQ is a feasible, effective, and reliable tool that can be used to evaluate Chinese patients' perception of health system accessibility.","PeriodicalId":42130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jnms-139931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire (PAHCQ) is the latest specific tool used to evaluate patients' accessibility to the health system. Objectives: This study aimed to translate and verify the item analysis, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity, and known-group analysis of the PAHCQ in a Chinese population. Methods: This study developed and validated the Chinese version of the PAHCQ. The translation of the PAHCQ was based on the back translation of Brislin. This study used simple random sampling to include a sample of 591 subjects in Jiangsu, China. Item analysis was used to verify the questionnaire's expert consistency and cultural adaptation. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the structure. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's α, and item validity and test-retest reliability were analyzed. Results: The CFA results indicated that the modified PAHCQ is reasonable. The Cronbach alpha value of the PAHCQ was 0.96. The correlation coefficients for the six domains in test-retest reliability were between 0.67 and 0.91. Comparison of the total PAHCQ scores among participants in different groups of age, gender, maternal status, education level, per capita monthly income, and CCI levels showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The Chinese version of the PAHCQ is a feasible, effective, and reliable tool that can be used to evaluate Chinese patients' perception of health system accessibility.
中文版卫生保健可及性问卷的信度和效度
背景:感知卫生保健可及性问卷(PAHCQ)是用于评估患者卫生系统可及性的最新特定工具。目的:对中国人群PAHCQ的项目分析、重测信度、内容效度、结构效度和已知组分析进行翻译和验证。方法:本研究开发并验证了PAHCQ的中文版。PAHCQ的翻译是基于布里斯林的反译。本研究采用简单随机抽样的方法,在中国江苏省抽取591名受试者。采用项目分析法验证问卷的专家一致性和文化适应性。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)对结构的有效性进行评价。采用Cronbach’s α法测定内部一致性,分析项目效度和重测信度。结果:CFA结果表明,改性PAHCQ是合理的。PAHCQ的Cronbach alpha值为0.96。重测信度的相关系数在0.67 ~ 0.91之间。不同年龄、性别、产妇状况、受教育程度、人均月收入、CCI水平的参与者PAHCQ总分比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论:中文版PAHCQ是一种可行、有效、可靠的工具,可用于评估中国患者对卫生系统可及性的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信