A pilot clinical skills coaching program to reimagine remediation: a cohort study

Jean E. Klig, William M. Kettyle, Joshua M. Kosowsky, William R. Phillips, Jr., Susan E. Farrell, Edward M. Hundert, John L. Dalrymple, Mary Ellen J. Goldhamer
{"title":"A pilot clinical skills coaching program to reimagine remediation: a cohort study","authors":"Jean E. Klig, William M. Kettyle, Joshua M. Kosowsky, William R. Phillips, Jr., Susan E. Farrell, Edward M. Hundert, John L. Dalrymple, Mary Ellen J. Goldhamer","doi":"10.12688/mep.19621.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<ns4:p><ns4:bold>Background</ns4:bold></ns4:p><ns4:p> New approaches are needed to improve and destigmatize remediation in undergraduate medical education (UME). The COVID-19 pandemic magnified the need to support struggling learners to ensure competency and readiness for graduate medical education (GME). Clinical skills (CS) coaching is an underutilized approach that may mitigate the stigma of remedial learning.</ns4:p><ns4:p> </ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods</ns4:bold></ns4:p><ns4:p> A six-month CS coaching pilot was conducted at Harvard Medical School (HMS) as a destigmatized remedial learning environment for clerkship and post-clerkship students identified as ‘at risk’ based on objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE). The pilot entailed individual and group coaching with five faculty, direct bedside observation of CS, and standardized patient encounters with video review. Strengths-based coaching principles and appreciative inquiry were emphasized. </ns4:p><ns4:p> </ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results</ns4:bold></ns4:p><ns4:p> Twenty-three students participated in the pilot: 14 clerkship students (cohort 1) and 9 post-clerkship students (cohort 2). All clerkship students (cohort 1) demonstrated sustained improvement in CS across three OSCEs compared to baseline: at pilot close, at 6-months post pilot, and at 21-24 months post-pilot all currently graduating students (10/10, 100%) passed the summative OSCE, an HMS graduation requirement. All post-clerkship students (cohort 2) passed the HMS graduation OSCE (9/9,100%). Feedback survey results included clerkship students (9/14; 64%) and post-clerkship students (7/9; 78%); all respondents unanimously agreed that individual coaching was “impactful to my clinical learning and practice”. Faculty and leadership fully supported the pilot as a destigmatized and effective approach to remediation. </ns4:p><ns4:p> </ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusion</ns4:bold></ns4:p><ns4:p> Remediation has an essential and growing role in medical schools. CS coaching for remedial learning can reduce stigma, foster a growth mindset, and support sustained progress for ‘at risk’ early clerkship through final year students. An “implementation template” with suggested tools and timelines can be locally adapted to guide CS coaching for UME remediation. The CS coaching pilot model is feasible and can be generalized to many UME programs.</ns4:p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19621.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background New approaches are needed to improve and destigmatize remediation in undergraduate medical education (UME). The COVID-19 pandemic magnified the need to support struggling learners to ensure competency and readiness for graduate medical education (GME). Clinical skills (CS) coaching is an underutilized approach that may mitigate the stigma of remedial learning. Methods A six-month CS coaching pilot was conducted at Harvard Medical School (HMS) as a destigmatized remedial learning environment for clerkship and post-clerkship students identified as ‘at risk’ based on objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE). The pilot entailed individual and group coaching with five faculty, direct bedside observation of CS, and standardized patient encounters with video review. Strengths-based coaching principles and appreciative inquiry were emphasized. Results Twenty-three students participated in the pilot: 14 clerkship students (cohort 1) and 9 post-clerkship students (cohort 2). All clerkship students (cohort 1) demonstrated sustained improvement in CS across three OSCEs compared to baseline: at pilot close, at 6-months post pilot, and at 21-24 months post-pilot all currently graduating students (10/10, 100%) passed the summative OSCE, an HMS graduation requirement. All post-clerkship students (cohort 2) passed the HMS graduation OSCE (9/9,100%). Feedback survey results included clerkship students (9/14; 64%) and post-clerkship students (7/9; 78%); all respondents unanimously agreed that individual coaching was “impactful to my clinical learning and practice”. Faculty and leadership fully supported the pilot as a destigmatized and effective approach to remediation. Conclusion Remediation has an essential and growing role in medical schools. CS coaching for remedial learning can reduce stigma, foster a growth mindset, and support sustained progress for ‘at risk’ early clerkship through final year students. An “implementation template” with suggested tools and timelines can be locally adapted to guide CS coaching for UME remediation. The CS coaching pilot model is feasible and can be generalized to many UME programs.
一项临床技能指导试点项目,以重新设想补救措施:一项队列研究
背景在医学本科教育中,需要采取新的措施来改善和消除对补习的污名化。2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行加大了支持苦苦挣扎的学习者的需求,以确保他们具备接受医学研究生教育的能力和准备。临床技能(CS)指导是一种未充分利用的方法,可以减轻补救学习的耻辱。方法在哈佛医学院(HMS)进行为期6个月的CS辅导试点,作为基于客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)确定为“有风险”的见习和见习后学生的去污名化补救学习环境。该试点包括5名教员的个人和小组指导,CS的直接床边观察,以及标准化的患者接触视频审查。强调了基于优势的指导原则和赞赏式询问。结果23名学生参加了试点:14名见习学生(队列1)和9名见习后学生(队列2)。与基线相比,所有见习学生(队列1)在三个OSCE中表现出持续的CS改善:在试点结束时,在试点后6个月,在试点后21-24个月,所有当前毕业的学生(10/10,100%)通过了总结性OSCE,即HMS毕业要求。所有实习后学生(队列2)都通过了HMS毕业OSCE(9/9,100%)。反馈调查结果包括见习学生(9/14;64%)和实习后学生(7/9;78%);所有受访者一致认为,个别辅导“对我的临床学习和实践有影响”。教员和领导层完全支持这一试点,认为这是一种消除污名和有效的补救方法。结论补习在医学院校教学中发挥着越来越重要的作用。CS对补救性学习的指导可以减少耻辱感,培养成长型思维,并支持“有风险”的早期见习学生到最后一年的持续进步。一个带有建议工具和时间表的“实施模板”可以在当地进行调整,以指导CS对UME补救的指导。CS训练试点模型是可行的,可以推广到许多UME项目中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信