Vitamin K supplementation impact in dialysis patients – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

NDT Plus Pub Date : 2023-10-14 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfad255
Titus Andrian, Anca Stefan, Ionut Nistor, Adrian Covic
{"title":"Vitamin K supplementation impact in dialysis patients – a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials","authors":"Titus Andrian, Anca Stefan, Ionut Nistor, Adrian Covic","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfad255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Vitamin K supplementation has been considered recently as a potential treatment for addressing vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the impact of vitamin K supplementation in dialysis patients. Electronic databases were searched for clinical randomized trials among patients treated with vitamin K. Random effects models were performed and risk of bias was evaluated with Cochrane tools and search was conducted until 15 of September 2023. Eleven trials comprising 830 patients (both adult and pediatric, mainly hemodialysis) compared vitamin K with different controls: lower doses of vitamin K, standard care or placebo. Vitamin K supplementation had no effect on mortality. Vitamin K administration improved vitamin K levels and led to lower levels of dp-uc-MGP and moderately increased Calcium levels (0,18 [0,04–0,32]). Vitamin K1 proved more potency in reducing dp-uc-MGP (SMD −1,64 [−2,05, −1,23] vs. −0,56 [−0,82, −0,31]) and also raised serum vitamin K levels in comparison with vitamin K2 (5,69 [3,43, 7,94]) vs. 2,25 [−2.36, 6,87]). While it did not have a proved benefit in changing calcification scores (−0,14 [−0,37–+0,09]), vitamin K proved to be a safe product. There was some concern with bias. Vitamin K supplementation has no impact on mortality and did not show significant benefit in reversing calcification scores. Vitamin K1 improved vitamin K deposits and lowered dp-uc-MGP which is a calcification biomarker more than vitamin K2. As it proved to be a safe product, additional randomized well-powered studies with improved treatment regimens are needed to establish the true impact of vitamin K in dialysis patients.","PeriodicalId":18987,"journal":{"name":"NDT Plus","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NDT Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Vitamin K supplementation has been considered recently as a potential treatment for addressing vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the impact of vitamin K supplementation in dialysis patients. Electronic databases were searched for clinical randomized trials among patients treated with vitamin K. Random effects models were performed and risk of bias was evaluated with Cochrane tools and search was conducted until 15 of September 2023. Eleven trials comprising 830 patients (both adult and pediatric, mainly hemodialysis) compared vitamin K with different controls: lower doses of vitamin K, standard care or placebo. Vitamin K supplementation had no effect on mortality. Vitamin K administration improved vitamin K levels and led to lower levels of dp-uc-MGP and moderately increased Calcium levels (0,18 [0,04–0,32]). Vitamin K1 proved more potency in reducing dp-uc-MGP (SMD −1,64 [−2,05, −1,23] vs. −0,56 [−0,82, −0,31]) and also raised serum vitamin K levels in comparison with vitamin K2 (5,69 [3,43, 7,94]) vs. 2,25 [−2.36, 6,87]). While it did not have a proved benefit in changing calcification scores (−0,14 [−0,37–+0,09]), vitamin K proved to be a safe product. There was some concern with bias. Vitamin K supplementation has no impact on mortality and did not show significant benefit in reversing calcification scores. Vitamin K1 improved vitamin K deposits and lowered dp-uc-MGP which is a calcification biomarker more than vitamin K2. As it proved to be a safe product, additional randomized well-powered studies with improved treatment regimens are needed to establish the true impact of vitamin K in dialysis patients.
补充维生素K对透析患者的影响——随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
补充维生素K最近被认为是解决慢性肾脏疾病患者血管钙化的潜在治疗方法。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以总结补充维生素K对透析患者的影响。在电子数据库中检索维生素k治疗患者的临床随机试验,采用随机效应模型,并使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险,检索一直进行到2023年9月15日。包括830名患者(成人和儿童,主要是血液透析)的11项试验比较了维生素K与不同对照:低剂量维生素K、标准治疗或安慰剂。补充维生素K对死亡率没有影响。服用维生素K可以改善维生素K水平,降低dp-uc-MGP水平,适度提高钙水平(0,18[0,04 - 0,32])。与维生素K2相比,维生素K1更能降低dp-uc-MGP (SMD - 1,64[−2,05,−1,23]比- 0,56[−0,82,−0,31]),还能提高血清维生素K水平(5,69[3,43,7,94]比2,25[−2.36,6,87])。虽然维生素K在改变钙化评分方面没有被证实有益处(- 0,14[- 0,37 - +0,09]),但维生素K被证明是一种安全的产品。有一些关于偏见的担忧。补充维生素K对死亡率没有影响,在逆转钙化评分方面也没有显示出显著的益处。维生素K1比维生素K2更能改善维生素K沉积,降低钙化生物标志物dp-uc-MGP。由于维生素K被证明是一种安全的产品,需要更多的随机、有力的研究来改进治疗方案,以确定维生素K对透析患者的真正影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信