Comparing the Effects of Post Facilitation Stretching and Active Release Technique on Pain, Pain Pressure Threshold and Patients Satisfaction in Upper Trapezius Trigger Points

Ali Asad Naeem, Yasha Sajjad, Dr. Adeel Mateen Qureshi, Laraib Noor, Qasim Raza, Amna Iqbal, Hafiz Muhammad umer Maqsood, Dr. Kaiynat Shafique PT
{"title":"Comparing the Effects of Post Facilitation Stretching and Active Release Technique on Pain, Pain Pressure Threshold and Patients Satisfaction in Upper Trapezius Trigger Points","authors":"Ali Asad Naeem, Yasha Sajjad, Dr. Adeel Mateen Qureshi, Laraib Noor, Qasim Raza, Amna Iqbal, Hafiz Muhammad umer Maqsood, Dr. Kaiynat Shafique PT","doi":"10.47672/ejhs.1616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Trigger points are localized, hyperirritable areas term as “Knots” and are palpable in taut band of muscle fibers, tendon or a ligament. To compare the effects on Post facilitation stretching and Active release technique on pain, pain pressure threshold and level of patients’ satisfaction in upper trapezius trigger points.
 Methodology: It was a quasi-experimental study with sample size of 30 and convenient sampling was used. Inclusion criteria of study were females and males of age 25 to 40 years, positive jump sign and persistent pain for more than 4 months. Study setting was the physical therapy departments of private hospitals of Faisalabad and Lahore. Study duration was 6 months. Out of 30 patients 15 were enrolled in group-A (baseline therapy and Post facilitation stretching) and remaining 15 were enrolled in group-B (baseline therapy and Active release technique). Pain pressure threshold was measured by algometer, Intensity of pain was assessed by NPRS before and after the treatment of one week and patient satisfaction was measure by PSQ-18 after the treatment. Data was analyzed by software SPSS 24. Demographic data and test statistics was presented in form of tables.
 Findings: Out of 30 patients, 33.3% were male and 66.7% were females. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test for within-group analysis revealed a significance difference (p≤0.05) in NPRS and PPT before and after the treatment in both groups. Mann-Whitney U test for between-group analyses showed the p>0.05, which means that no significant differences was observed in results produced by Post facilitation stretching in group A and Active release technique in group B.
 Recommendations: A significantly reduction in the pain intensity and enhancement in pain pressure threshold was observed in both groups. Both Post facilitation stretching and active release techniques were equally effective in reducing intensity of pain, improving pain pressure threshold in upper trapezius trigger points and patients of both groups showed equally satisfaction level after the treatment. Informed by targeted intervention theories, the study utilized rigorous research methodologies for validation. Practitioners are advised to undergo specialized training for PFS and ART application, ensuring a tailored approach per individual needs. Policymakers should set stringent licensing standards and promote continued research to bolster the techniques' efficacy and widespread adoption.","PeriodicalId":224837,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.1616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Trigger points are localized, hyperirritable areas term as “Knots” and are palpable in taut band of muscle fibers, tendon or a ligament. To compare the effects on Post facilitation stretching and Active release technique on pain, pain pressure threshold and level of patients’ satisfaction in upper trapezius trigger points. Methodology: It was a quasi-experimental study with sample size of 30 and convenient sampling was used. Inclusion criteria of study were females and males of age 25 to 40 years, positive jump sign and persistent pain for more than 4 months. Study setting was the physical therapy departments of private hospitals of Faisalabad and Lahore. Study duration was 6 months. Out of 30 patients 15 were enrolled in group-A (baseline therapy and Post facilitation stretching) and remaining 15 were enrolled in group-B (baseline therapy and Active release technique). Pain pressure threshold was measured by algometer, Intensity of pain was assessed by NPRS before and after the treatment of one week and patient satisfaction was measure by PSQ-18 after the treatment. Data was analyzed by software SPSS 24. Demographic data and test statistics was presented in form of tables. Findings: Out of 30 patients, 33.3% were male and 66.7% were females. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test for within-group analysis revealed a significance difference (p≤0.05) in NPRS and PPT before and after the treatment in both groups. Mann-Whitney U test for between-group analyses showed the p>0.05, which means that no significant differences was observed in results produced by Post facilitation stretching in group A and Active release technique in group B. Recommendations: A significantly reduction in the pain intensity and enhancement in pain pressure threshold was observed in both groups. Both Post facilitation stretching and active release techniques were equally effective in reducing intensity of pain, improving pain pressure threshold in upper trapezius trigger points and patients of both groups showed equally satisfaction level after the treatment. Informed by targeted intervention theories, the study utilized rigorous research methodologies for validation. Practitioners are advised to undergo specialized training for PFS and ART application, ensuring a tailored approach per individual needs. Policymakers should set stringent licensing standards and promote continued research to bolster the techniques' efficacy and widespread adoption.
比较后易化拉伸与主动释放技术对上斜方肌触发点疼痛、痛压阈值及患者满意度的影响
目的:触发点是局部的,被称为“结”的高激惹区域,在肌肉纤维,肌腱或韧带的紧绷带中可触及。比较后易化拉伸与主动释放技术对上斜方肌触发点疼痛、痛压阈值及患者满意度的影响。 方法:本研究为准实验研究,样本量为30人,采用方便抽样。研究纳入标准为男女,年龄25 ~ 40岁,跳跃征阳性,持续疼痛4个月以上。研究环境是费萨拉巴德和拉合尔私立医院的物理治疗部门。研究时间为6个月。在30例患者中,15例入组a组(基线治疗和后易化拉伸),其余15例入组b组(基线治疗和主动释放技术)。治疗前后1周采用疼痛压力计测量疼痛压力阈值,治疗后采用NPRS评估疼痛强度,治疗后采用PSQ-18测量患者满意度。数据采用SPSS 24软件进行分析。人口统计数据和检验统计数据以表格的形式呈现。 结果:30例患者中,男性占33.3%,女性占66.7%。组内分析的Wilcoxon sign - rank检验显示,两组患者治疗前后NPRS、PPT差异均有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。组间分析Mann-Whitney U检验显示p>0.05,即A组后促进拉伸法与B组主动释放法的结果无显著差异。 建议:两组患者疼痛强度均明显降低,痛压阈值明显升高。后促进拉伸和主动释放技术在减轻疼痛强度、提高斜方肌上触发点痛压阈值方面效果相同,两组患者治疗后满意度相同。根据有针对性的干预理论,本研究采用了严格的研究方法进行验证。建议从业人员接受PFS和抗逆转录病毒治疗应用方面的专门培训,确保根据个人需要采取量身定制的方法。决策者应该制定严格的许可标准,并促进持续的研究,以加强这些技术的有效性和广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信