Impact of Different Treatments for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation on Patients with or without Biliary Drainage for Severe Biliary Tract Infection

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Makoto Kobayashi, Shun Takai, Kyohei Sakurai, Yoshimatsu Ehama
{"title":"Impact of Different Treatments for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation on Patients with or without Biliary Drainage for Severe Biliary Tract Infection","authors":"Makoto Kobayashi, Shun Takai, Kyohei Sakurai, Yoshimatsu Ehama","doi":"10.2147/oaem.s423097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Sepsis caused by severe acute cholangitis requires biliary drainage to decrease the intra-biliary pressure. Furthermore, several studies showed that anticoagulant treatment can improve the outcomes of patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). There were reports examining the efficacy of anti-DIC drugs in patients undergoing biliary drainage with sepsis-associated DIC, and no reports compared the efficacy of DIC treatments when no drainage is performed. In this study, the influence of antithrombin (AT) replacement therapy and recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) preparations on the overall survival (OS) of patients with and without biliary drainage was analyzed. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study in a single institution involved patients with sepsis-associated DIC caused by severe biliary tract infection. In total, 71 patients treated by either AT replacement therapy or rTM preparation were assessed for inclusion. The two groups were patients with biliary drainage (n = 45) and without drainage (n = 26). To assess the clinical efficacy of anti-DIC drugs in each group, the 60-day OS was determined through estimated survival analysis. Results: Focusing on the effects of different therapeutic agents for DIC, in the group of patients with biliary drainage, OS showed no difference between patients treated by rTM and AT. However, in patients without biliary drainage, the survival curves of patients treated with AT replacement were lower than those of patients with rTM preparation. Conclusion: This study revealed that the OS of patients without biliary drainage differed depending on the DIC therapeutic agent for sepsis-associated DIC caused by acute cholangitis. We would recommend the use of rTM preparation over AT replacement therapy for patients who cannot undergo biliary drainage. Keywords: sepsis, antithrombin, recombinant thrombomodulin, DIC treatment, acute cholangitis","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/oaem.s423097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Sepsis caused by severe acute cholangitis requires biliary drainage to decrease the intra-biliary pressure. Furthermore, several studies showed that anticoagulant treatment can improve the outcomes of patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). There were reports examining the efficacy of anti-DIC drugs in patients undergoing biliary drainage with sepsis-associated DIC, and no reports compared the efficacy of DIC treatments when no drainage is performed. In this study, the influence of antithrombin (AT) replacement therapy and recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) preparations on the overall survival (OS) of patients with and without biliary drainage was analyzed. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study in a single institution involved patients with sepsis-associated DIC caused by severe biliary tract infection. In total, 71 patients treated by either AT replacement therapy or rTM preparation were assessed for inclusion. The two groups were patients with biliary drainage (n = 45) and without drainage (n = 26). To assess the clinical efficacy of anti-DIC drugs in each group, the 60-day OS was determined through estimated survival analysis. Results: Focusing on the effects of different therapeutic agents for DIC, in the group of patients with biliary drainage, OS showed no difference between patients treated by rTM and AT. However, in patients without biliary drainage, the survival curves of patients treated with AT replacement were lower than those of patients with rTM preparation. Conclusion: This study revealed that the OS of patients without biliary drainage differed depending on the DIC therapeutic agent for sepsis-associated DIC caused by acute cholangitis. We would recommend the use of rTM preparation over AT replacement therapy for patients who cannot undergo biliary drainage. Keywords: sepsis, antithrombin, recombinant thrombomodulin, DIC treatment, acute cholangitis
播散性血管内凝血不同治疗方法对重症胆道感染患者行或不行胆道引流的影响
目的:重症急性胆管炎致脓毒症需要胆道引流以降低胆道内压。此外,一些研究表明抗凝治疗可以改善脓毒症相关弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)患者的预后。有报道研究了抗DIC药物对胆道引流合并脓毒症相关性DIC患者的疗效,但没有报道比较不引流时DIC治疗的疗效。本研究分析了抗凝血酶(AT)替代治疗和重组凝血调节素(rTM)制剂对胆道引流和非胆道引流患者总生存期(OS)的影响。患者和方法:该回顾性队列研究在单一机构中纳入了由严重胆道感染引起的脓毒症相关DIC患者。共有71名接受AT替代疗法或rTM制剂治疗的患者被纳入评估。两组分别为行胆道引流(n = 45)和不行胆道引流(n = 26)。为了评估各组抗dic药物的临床疗效,通过估计生存分析确定60天生存期。结果:关注不同治疗药物对DIC的影响,在胆道引流组,rTM与AT治疗组的OS无差异。然而,在没有胆道引流的患者中,AT替代治疗患者的生存曲线低于rTM制剂患者。结论:本研究显示,急性胆管炎所致脓毒症相关性DIC患者无胆道引流的OS随DIC治疗剂的不同而不同。对于不能行胆道引流的患者,我们建议使用rTM制剂而不是AT替代疗法。关键词:脓毒症,抗凝血酶,重组凝血调节蛋白,DIC治疗,急性胆管炎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信