Assessment of input-output relationship of crop enterprises in the different climate change adaptation options among farmers in Borno State, Nigeria

D. Mohammed, S. S. Abaka, E. Timothy, A. A. Arubi
{"title":"Assessment of input-output relationship of crop enterprises in the different climate change adaptation options among farmers in Borno State, Nigeria","authors":"D. Mohammed, S. S. Abaka, E. Timothy, A. A. Arubi","doi":"10.5897/ajar2023.16482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study analyzed the input-output relationship of crop enterprises in response to different climate change adaptation options among farmers in Borno State, Nigeria. The research was conducted in two agroecological zones (AEZ) within the state, employing a multi-stage sampling procedure to select 360 farmers for the study. Data analysis involved the use of means, frequencies, and multiple regression techniques. The results regarding adaptation practices in the respective AEZs revealed that in the Sudan AEZ, farmers primarily employed strategies such as multiple cropping (98.9%), early planting (63.9%), mulching/use of cover crops (36.1%), and increased fertilizer application (25.00%). In the Guinea AEZ, the most widely used adaptation strategies included multiple cropping (93.30%), utilization of new crop varieties tolerant to the evolving climate (72.20%), increased fertilizer application (47.20%), and the use of herbicides (25.00%). The production function analysis results demonstrated that approximately 85, 51, 53, 57, 81 and 65% of the variations in yields resulting from climate change adaptation strategies, such as the application of herbicides, utilization of organic manure, early planting, increased fertilizer application, mulching, and the use of cover crops, as well as the use of improved crop varieties tolerant to the new climate regime, were accounted for by the inputs. Furthermore, the coefficients of production inputs were significant and positively correlated with crop yields across different adaptation strategies and at various levels. In conclusion, the study found that farmers primarily employed technically-based adaptation strategies, and production inputs played a crucial role in determining crop yields across various adaptation approaches. It is recommended, among other measures, that adaptation materials be provided to farmers at a subsidized rate. Key words: Input-output, crop enterprises, climate change, adaptation strategies, Borno State.","PeriodicalId":7540,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Agricultural Research","volume":"581 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar2023.16482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study analyzed the input-output relationship of crop enterprises in response to different climate change adaptation options among farmers in Borno State, Nigeria. The research was conducted in two agroecological zones (AEZ) within the state, employing a multi-stage sampling procedure to select 360 farmers for the study. Data analysis involved the use of means, frequencies, and multiple regression techniques. The results regarding adaptation practices in the respective AEZs revealed that in the Sudan AEZ, farmers primarily employed strategies such as multiple cropping (98.9%), early planting (63.9%), mulching/use of cover crops (36.1%), and increased fertilizer application (25.00%). In the Guinea AEZ, the most widely used adaptation strategies included multiple cropping (93.30%), utilization of new crop varieties tolerant to the evolving climate (72.20%), increased fertilizer application (47.20%), and the use of herbicides (25.00%). The production function analysis results demonstrated that approximately 85, 51, 53, 57, 81 and 65% of the variations in yields resulting from climate change adaptation strategies, such as the application of herbicides, utilization of organic manure, early planting, increased fertilizer application, mulching, and the use of cover crops, as well as the use of improved crop varieties tolerant to the new climate regime, were accounted for by the inputs. Furthermore, the coefficients of production inputs were significant and positively correlated with crop yields across different adaptation strategies and at various levels. In conclusion, the study found that farmers primarily employed technically-based adaptation strategies, and production inputs played a crucial role in determining crop yields across various adaptation approaches. It is recommended, among other measures, that adaptation materials be provided to farmers at a subsidized rate. Key words: Input-output, crop enterprises, climate change, adaptation strategies, Borno State.
尼日利亚博尔诺州农民在不同气候变化适应方案下作物企业投入产出关系评估
本研究分析了尼日利亚博尔诺州农民在不同气候变化适应方案下作物企业的投入产出关系。该研究在该州的两个农业生态区(AEZ)进行,采用多阶段抽样程序,选择360名农民进行研究。数据分析包括使用均值、频率和多元回归技术。结果显示,在苏丹经济特区,农民主要采用复种(98.9%)、早期种植(63.9%)、覆盖/使用覆盖作物(36.1%)和增加施肥(25.00%)等策略。在几内亚经济特区,最广泛使用的适应策略包括复作(93.30%)、利用适应气候变化的新作物品种(72.20%)、增加施肥(47.20%)和使用除草剂(25.00%)。生产函数分析结果表明,大约85%、51%、53%、57%、81%和65%的产量变化是由气候变化适应策略造成的,如使用除草剂、使用有机肥、早期种植、增加施肥、覆盖、使用覆盖作物,以及使用耐受新气候制度的改良作物品种。此外,在不同的适应策略和不同的水平上,生产投入系数与作物产量呈显著正相关。总之,该研究发现,农民主要采用基于技术的适应策略,而生产投入在决定各种适应方法的作物产量方面发挥了关键作用。除其他措施外,建议以补贴率向农民提供适应材料。关键词:投入产出,作物企业,气候变化,适应策略,博尔诺州
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Agricultural Research
African Journal of Agricultural Research 农林科学-农业综合
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
2.6 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信