Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Matthew M. Kalscheur MD, FHRS , Matthew R. Martini MD , Marcus Mahnke BS , Fauzia Osman MPH , Daniel S. Modaff MD , Blake E. Fleeman MD , Ryan T. Kipp MD, FHRS , Jennifer M. Wright MD, FHRS , Joshua E. Medow MD, PhD
{"title":"Evaluation of an adaptive, rule-based dosing algorithm to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation ablation","authors":"Matthew M. Kalscheur MD, FHRS ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Martini MD ,&nbsp;Marcus Mahnke BS ,&nbsp;Fauzia Osman MPH ,&nbsp;Daniel S. Modaff MD ,&nbsp;Blake E. Fleeman MD ,&nbsp;Ryan T. Kipp MD, FHRS ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Wright MD, FHRS ,&nbsp;Joshua E. Medow MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cerebral thromboembolism during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an infrequent (0.17%) complication in part owing to strict adherence to intraprocedural anticoagulation. Failure to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation can lead to an increase in events, including silent cerebral ischemia.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate a computerized, clinical decision support system (CDSS) to dose intraprocedural anticoagulation and determine if it leads to improved intraprocedural anticoagulation outcomes during AF ablation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Digital Intern dosing algorithm is an adaptive, rule-based CDSS for heparin dosing. The initial dose is calculated from the patient’s weight, baseline activated clotting time (ACT), and outpatient anticoagulant. Subsequent recommendations adapt based on individual patient ACT changes. Outcomes from 50 cases prior to algorithm introduction were compared to 139 cases using the algorithm.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Procedures using the dosing algorithm reached goal ACT (over 300 seconds) faster (17.6 ± 11.1 minutes vs 33.3 ± 23.6 minutes pre-algorithm, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). ACTs fell below goal while in the LA (odds ratio 0.20 [0.10–0.39], <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and rose above 400 seconds less frequently (odds ratio 0.21 [0.07–0.59], <em>P</em> = .003). System Usability Scale scores were excellent (96 ± 5, n = 7, score &gt;80.3 excellent). Preprocedure anticoagulant, weight, baseline ACT, age, sex, and renal function were potential predictors of heparin dose to achieve ACT &gt;300 seconds and final infusion rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A heparin dosing CDSS based on rules and adaptation to individual patient response improved maintenance of therapeutic ACT during AF ablation and was rated highly by nurses for usability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"4 6","pages":"Pages 173-182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000749/pdfft?md5=8aa219005b5980da0d4d8a24b2a7977f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693623000749-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693623000749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cerebral thromboembolism during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an infrequent (0.17%) complication in part owing to strict adherence to intraprocedural anticoagulation. Failure to maintain therapeutic anticoagulation can lead to an increase in events, including silent cerebral ischemia.

Objective

To evaluate a computerized, clinical decision support system (CDSS) to dose intraprocedural anticoagulation and determine if it leads to improved intraprocedural anticoagulation outcomes during AF ablation.

Methods

The Digital Intern dosing algorithm is an adaptive, rule-based CDSS for heparin dosing. The initial dose is calculated from the patient’s weight, baseline activated clotting time (ACT), and outpatient anticoagulant. Subsequent recommendations adapt based on individual patient ACT changes. Outcomes from 50 cases prior to algorithm introduction were compared to 139 cases using the algorithm.

Results

Procedures using the dosing algorithm reached goal ACT (over 300 seconds) faster (17.6 ± 11.1 minutes vs 33.3 ± 23.6 minutes pre-algorithm, P < .001). ACTs fell below goal while in the LA (odds ratio 0.20 [0.10–0.39], P < .001) and rose above 400 seconds less frequently (odds ratio 0.21 [0.07–0.59], P = .003). System Usability Scale scores were excellent (96 ± 5, n = 7, score >80.3 excellent). Preprocedure anticoagulant, weight, baseline ACT, age, sex, and renal function were potential predictors of heparin dose to achieve ACT >300 seconds and final infusion rate.

Conclusion

A heparin dosing CDSS based on rules and adaptation to individual patient response improved maintenance of therapeutic ACT during AF ablation and was rated highly by nurses for usability.

Abstract Image

评估基于规则的自适应剂量算法,以在心房颤动消融过程中维持治疗性抗凝血功能
背景心房颤动(房颤)消融过程中的脑血栓栓塞是一种不常见(0.17%)的并发症,部分原因是严格遵守术中抗凝治疗。方法 "数字实习生剂量算法 "是一种用于肝素剂量的自适应、基于规则的 CDSS。初始剂量根据患者的体重、基线活化凝血时间(ACT)和门诊抗凝剂计算得出。随后的建议会根据患者个体活化凝血时间(ACT)的变化进行调整。结果使用剂量算法的手术更快达到目标 ACT(300 秒以上)(17.6 ± 11.1 分钟 vs 33.3 ± 23.6 分钟,P < .001)。在LA中,ACT低于目标值(几率比0.20 [0.10-0.39],P = .001),超过400秒的情况较少(几率比0.21 [0.07-0.59],P = .003)。系统易用性量表评分为优秀(96 ± 5,n = 7,评分>80.3优秀)。手术前抗凝剂、体重、基线 ACT、年龄、性别和肾功能是达到 300 秒 ACT 的肝素剂量和最终输注率的潜在预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信