Policy Perspectives on Efforts to End Conversion Practices

IF 2.9 3区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Cognitive and Behavioral Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cbpra.2023.09.001

Sarah Campau

引用次数: 0

Abstract

After over 50 years of research and debate, the cognitive and behavioral scientific community has overwhelmingly condemned attempts to change a person’s gender identity or sexuality. Despite evidence that conversion practices are ineffective and harmful, politicians debate the rights of LGBTQIA+ individuals while change efforts continue. Using the advocacy coalition framework, this paper discusses the influence of research, policy, and debate in the context of larger social and political change. As members of a policy advocacy coalition, cognitive and behavioral practitioners have the power to influence laws and other forms of policy.

查看原文本刊更多论文

从政策角度看终止转换做法的努力

经过 50 多年的研究和辩论，认知和行为科学界绝大多数人都谴责试图改变一个人的性别认同或性行为的做法。尽管有证据表明改变行为是无效和有害的，但政治家们仍在辩论 LGBTQIA+ 个人的权利，而改变行为的努力仍在继续。本文采用倡导联盟框架，讨论了研究、政策和辩论在更大的社会和政治变革背景下的影响。作为政策倡导联盟的成员，认知和行为实践者有能力影响法律和其他形式的政策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cognitive and Behavioral Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

3.40%

发文量

118

审稿时长

84 days

期刊介绍： Cognitive and Behavioral Practice is a quarterly international journal that serves an enduring resource for empirically informed methods of clinical practice. Its mission is to bridge the gap between published research and the actual clinical practice of cognitive behavior therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice publishes clinically rich accounts of innovative assessment and diagnostic and therapeutic procedures that are clearly grounded in empirical research. A focus on application and implementation of procedures is maintained.