Assessment of inter-rater reliability of screening tools to identify patients at risk of medication-related problems across the emergency department continuum of care
Jessica D’lima , Simone E. Taylor , Elise Mitri , Andrew Harding , Jerry Lai , Elizabeth Manias
{"title":"Assessment of inter-rater reliability of screening tools to identify patients at risk of medication-related problems across the emergency department continuum of care","authors":"Jessica D’lima , Simone E. Taylor , Elise Mitri , Andrew Harding , Jerry Lai , Elizabeth Manias","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2023.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Following a national multicentre study, two emergency department (ED) screening tools were developed to determine risk of medication-related problems; one for use at ED presentation and another at ED discharge to the community. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability amongst ED health professionals when applying these screening tools to a series of case scenarios.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective, cross-sectional study was undertaken in the ED of a major metropolitan hospital. Twelve case scenarios were developed following ED observation of a range of patients, which were incorporated into a questionnaire and distributed to 50 health professionals. Inter-rater reliabilities of each explanatory variable of the screening tools and overall assessment were calculated using Fleiss’ multi-rater kappa.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The questionnaire was completed by 15 doctors, 19 nurses and 16 pharmacists. Fleiss’ kappa showed an overall inter-rater reliability for the ED presentation tool of 0.83 (95% CI 0.83–0.84), indicating near perfect agreement. Fleiss’ kappa for the ED discharge tool was 0.83 (95% CI 0.83–0.85), which also showed near perfect agreement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The screening tools produced favourable inter-rater reliability amongst ED health professionals. These results have important implications for ensuring consistency of ED decision-making in screening patients at risk of developing medication-related problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":"27 2","pages":"Pages 136-141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000878/pdfft?md5=a0bd8d5bacc1cd49c64d8a68684e306d&pid=1-s2.0-S2588994X23000878-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X23000878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Following a national multicentre study, two emergency department (ED) screening tools were developed to determine risk of medication-related problems; one for use at ED presentation and another at ED discharge to the community. This study aimed to determine the inter-rater reliability amongst ED health professionals when applying these screening tools to a series of case scenarios.
Methods
A prospective, cross-sectional study was undertaken in the ED of a major metropolitan hospital. Twelve case scenarios were developed following ED observation of a range of patients, which were incorporated into a questionnaire and distributed to 50 health professionals. Inter-rater reliabilities of each explanatory variable of the screening tools and overall assessment were calculated using Fleiss’ multi-rater kappa.
Results
The questionnaire was completed by 15 doctors, 19 nurses and 16 pharmacists. Fleiss’ kappa showed an overall inter-rater reliability for the ED presentation tool of 0.83 (95% CI 0.83–0.84), indicating near perfect agreement. Fleiss’ kappa for the ED discharge tool was 0.83 (95% CI 0.83–0.85), which also showed near perfect agreement.
Conclusions
The screening tools produced favourable inter-rater reliability amongst ED health professionals. These results have important implications for ensuring consistency of ED decision-making in screening patients at risk of developing medication-related problems.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.