{"title":"“Only the Sufferer Knows”: Long-term problems and experiences of kidney transplant recipients: A phenomenological study","authors":"Deniz Taşdemir , Büşra Nur Temür , Nilgün Aksoy","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding the experiences of kidney transplant recipients is important to ensure their inclusion in key strategies and future planning of renal services.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore the long-term problems and experiences of adults who have had a kidney transplant due to end-stage kidney disease after discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a descriptive phenomenological study. The data were collected through in-depth interviews. A personal information form and semi-structured interview guide were used in the interviews. The interviews were recorded using a voice recorder and conducted by adhering to the semi-structured interview guide. When data saturation was reached and no new information emerged, data collection was terminated after the 17th participant, whose responses were found to be repetitive. In this study, a descriptive phenomenological design and thematic analysis approach based on Husserl’s philosophy was used. The data analysis process was carried out independently by all researchers. Throughout this process, the researchers held regular meetings to discuss and compare the emerging findings. Individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were transcribed verbatim. The findings were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>In total, 17 kidney transplant recipients (five women and 12 men) were included in the study. In the data analysis process, three main themes and 10 sub-themes were identified. Main themes: (i) problems experienced by kidney transplant recipients, (ii) inevitable fears, and (iii) situations that only individuals with kidney transplants can understand — “Only the Sufferer Knows”. Sub-themes: management of drug therapy, role–relationship management, permanent treatment responsibilities and burden, fear of rejection, fear of returning to </span>dialysis treatment, pervasive fear of routine examination results, significance of kidney transplant surgery, sense of gratitude towards the donor, being ‘sick’ in the eyes of others, and not being understood by others.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study provides new insights into understanding the lives of post-transplant kidney transplant recipients. Renal healthcare professionals should focus on the psychological impact as much as the biological impact on recipients of kidney transplants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 835-842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769623000938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Understanding the experiences of kidney transplant recipients is important to ensure their inclusion in key strategies and future planning of renal services.
Aim
To explore the long-term problems and experiences of adults who have had a kidney transplant due to end-stage kidney disease after discharge.
Methods
This was a descriptive phenomenological study. The data were collected through in-depth interviews. A personal information form and semi-structured interview guide were used in the interviews. The interviews were recorded using a voice recorder and conducted by adhering to the semi-structured interview guide. When data saturation was reached and no new information emerged, data collection was terminated after the 17th participant, whose responses were found to be repetitive. In this study, a descriptive phenomenological design and thematic analysis approach based on Husserl’s philosophy was used. The data analysis process was carried out independently by all researchers. Throughout this process, the researchers held regular meetings to discuss and compare the emerging findings. Individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were transcribed verbatim. The findings were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step analysis.
Results
In total, 17 kidney transplant recipients (five women and 12 men) were included in the study. In the data analysis process, three main themes and 10 sub-themes were identified. Main themes: (i) problems experienced by kidney transplant recipients, (ii) inevitable fears, and (iii) situations that only individuals with kidney transplants can understand — “Only the Sufferer Knows”. Sub-themes: management of drug therapy, role–relationship management, permanent treatment responsibilities and burden, fear of rejection, fear of returning to dialysis treatment, pervasive fear of routine examination results, significance of kidney transplant surgery, sense of gratitude towards the donor, being ‘sick’ in the eyes of others, and not being understood by others.
Conclusion
This study provides new insights into understanding the lives of post-transplant kidney transplant recipients. Renal healthcare professionals should focus on the psychological impact as much as the biological impact on recipients of kidney transplants.
期刊介绍:
Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN).
The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues.
Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor.
The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription.
ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.