The feasibility of distance to the tumor of biopsy cores to estimate the extracapsular extension

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Chang Lim Hyun , Kyung Kgi Park
{"title":"The feasibility of distance to the tumor of biopsy cores to estimate the extracapsular extension","authors":"Chang Lim Hyun ,&nbsp;Kyung Kgi Park","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To investigate the predictive capability of a new parameter, the distance between the fibromuscular capsule and the tumor as measured using a prostate biopsy core (referred to as “distance to the tumor” [DTT]), for the presence of extracapsular extension (ECE).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We analyzed specimens obtained from 246 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. All patients underwent prebiopsy, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and subsequent prostatectomy. DTT measurements were obtained for each prostate biopsy core, and the minimum (min) DTT was extracted. We assessed the relationship between min DTT, MRI-estimated ECE, and pathological ECE, considering factors such as the PI-RADS score and tumor location.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In this study of 246 patients, the mean age was 65.8 years, and the mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 18.9 ng/ml. Patients with suspicious lesions in the peripheral zone and pathological ECE displayed higher rates of positive digital rectal examination (DRE), elevated PSA levels, and shorter DTT values in the biopsy cores. DTT demonstrated an accurate estimation of the presence of ECE, similar to MRI findings. Min DTT exhibited higher accuracy for peripheral zone masses, with a cutoff value of 1.0 mm for min DTT predicting ECE (AUC: 0.84, sensitivity: 72.23%, specificity: 77.78%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Of the 246 patients, 66 had no ECE on MRI; however, 18 of these patients displayed pathological ECE, with 14 having DTT values &lt;1.0 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Min DTT, positive DRE results, and a higher Gleason grade were significantly associated with ECE. DTT measurements of &lt;1 mm can provide a more accurate prediction of ECE in the peripheral zone of the prostate than MRI-based assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 233-238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888223000557/pdfft?md5=7100e4c12f4028ece8a0c9005215e082&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888223000557-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888223000557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To investigate the predictive capability of a new parameter, the distance between the fibromuscular capsule and the tumor as measured using a prostate biopsy core (referred to as “distance to the tumor” [DTT]), for the presence of extracapsular extension (ECE).

Materials and methods

We analyzed specimens obtained from 246 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. All patients underwent prebiopsy, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and subsequent prostatectomy. DTT measurements were obtained for each prostate biopsy core, and the minimum (min) DTT was extracted. We assessed the relationship between min DTT, MRI-estimated ECE, and pathological ECE, considering factors such as the PI-RADS score and tumor location.

Results

In this study of 246 patients, the mean age was 65.8 years, and the mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 18.9 ng/ml. Patients with suspicious lesions in the peripheral zone and pathological ECE displayed higher rates of positive digital rectal examination (DRE), elevated PSA levels, and shorter DTT values in the biopsy cores. DTT demonstrated an accurate estimation of the presence of ECE, similar to MRI findings. Min DTT exhibited higher accuracy for peripheral zone masses, with a cutoff value of 1.0 mm for min DTT predicting ECE (AUC: 0.84, sensitivity: 72.23%, specificity: 77.78%, P < 0.01). Of the 246 patients, 66 had no ECE on MRI; however, 18 of these patients displayed pathological ECE, with 14 having DTT values <1.0 mm.

Conclusions

Min DTT, positive DRE results, and a higher Gleason grade were significantly associated with ECE. DTT measurements of <1 mm can provide a more accurate prediction of ECE in the peripheral zone of the prostate than MRI-based assessments.

用活组织切片核心到肿瘤的距离来估算囊外扩展的可行性
背景研究一个新参数--使用前列腺活检核心测量的纤维肌囊与肿瘤之间的距离(简称为 "到肿瘤的距离"[DTT])--对是否存在囊外扩展(ECE)的预测能力。所有患者均接受了前列腺活检、前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)和随后的前列腺切除术。我们对每个前列腺活检核心进行了 DTT 测量,并提取了最小(min)DTT。考虑到 PI-RADS 评分和肿瘤位置等因素,我们评估了最小 DTT、MRI 估计 ECE 和病理 ECE 之间的关系。外周可疑病变和病理 ECE 患者的数字直肠检查(DRE)阳性率较高,PSA 水平升高,活检核心的 DTT 值较短。DTT 能准确估计是否存在 ECE,与核磁共振成像结果类似。最小 DTT 对外周区肿块的准确性更高,最小 DTT 预测 ECE 的临界值为 1.0 mm(AUC:0.84,灵敏度:72.23%,特异性:77.78%,P < 0.01)。结论最小 DTT 值、DRE 阳性结果和较高的 Gleason 等级与 ECE 显著相关。与基于核磁共振成像的评估相比,1 毫米的 DTT 测量值能更准确地预测前列腺外周区的 ECE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信