A 270° Retention of Spinal Structure in the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis via Posterior-Only Approach

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Wujun Miao, Tong Meng, Jian Yang, Qi Jia, Tianqi Fan, Lei Zhou, Lianshun Jia, Dianwen Song
{"title":"A 270° Retention of Spinal Structure in the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis via Posterior-Only Approach","authors":"Wujun Miao, Tong Meng, Jian Yang, Qi Jia, Tianqi Fan, Lei Zhou, Lianshun Jia, Dianwen Song","doi":"10.9738/intsurg-d-17-00060.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The necessity of radical debridement in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis is increasingly challenged. We introduce the 1-stage surgical treatment with 270° retention of the spinal structure via a posterior-only approach and investigate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of this method in treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Summary of Background Data In former research articles, many potential disadvantages are found in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis after radical debridement, such as prolonged operative time, increased the surgical trauma, unsatisfactory bony fusion, instability of the spine, and too much blood loss. Methods Twenty-one patients who had thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis were admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and September 2014. All of them were treated with 1-stage surgical treatment by internal fixation, focal debridement, and fusion via the posterior-only approach. Then, the clinical efficacy was evaluated, with the Cobb angle reflecting spinal kyphotic angles, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Frankel Grade scores, and imaging examination preoperatively and postoperatively. Results Patients were followed up for 24 to 40 months (mean, 29.95 months), Fusion occurred at 4 to 9 months (mean, 5.86 months). There were significant differences between groups regarding the Cobb angle, ESR, and Frankel Grade scores. Delayed wound healing affected 1 patient because of diabetes. No complications regarding the internal fixation and no tuberculosis recurrence were observed during follow-up. Conclusions Combined with anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy, the method, characterized by 270° retention of the spinal structure, can be an effective and feasible method in treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.","PeriodicalId":14474,"journal":{"name":"International surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-17-00060.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The necessity of radical debridement in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis is increasingly challenged. We introduce the 1-stage surgical treatment with 270° retention of the spinal structure via a posterior-only approach and investigate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of this method in treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Summary of Background Data In former research articles, many potential disadvantages are found in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis after radical debridement, such as prolonged operative time, increased the surgical trauma, unsatisfactory bony fusion, instability of the spine, and too much blood loss. Methods Twenty-one patients who had thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis were admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and September 2014. All of them were treated with 1-stage surgical treatment by internal fixation, focal debridement, and fusion via the posterior-only approach. Then, the clinical efficacy was evaluated, with the Cobb angle reflecting spinal kyphotic angles, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Frankel Grade scores, and imaging examination preoperatively and postoperatively. Results Patients were followed up for 24 to 40 months (mean, 29.95 months), Fusion occurred at 4 to 9 months (mean, 5.86 months). There were significant differences between groups regarding the Cobb angle, ESR, and Frankel Grade scores. Delayed wound healing affected 1 patient because of diabetes. No complications regarding the internal fixation and no tuberculosis recurrence were observed during follow-up. Conclusions Combined with anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy, the method, characterized by 270° retention of the spinal structure, can be an effective and feasible method in treating thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.
270°脊柱结构保留在胸腰椎结核治疗中的应用
目的根治性清创治疗胸腰椎结核的必要性日益受到质疑。我们介绍了一种仅后路270°脊柱结构保留的一期手术治疗方法,并探讨了该方法治疗胸腰椎结核的临床疗效和可行性。在以往的研究文章中,发现根治性清创后治疗胸腰椎结核有许多潜在的缺点,如手术时间延长、手术创伤增加、骨融合不理想、脊柱不稳定、失血过多等。方法2013年1月至2014年9月收治21例胸腰椎结核患者。所有患者均采用一期手术治疗,包括内固定、局灶清创和单纯后路融合。然后,通过反映脊柱后凸角的Cobb角、红细胞沉降率(ESR)、Frankel Grade评分以及术前、术后影像学检查评估临床疗效。结果随访24 ~ 40个月,平均29.95个月,4 ~ 9个月融合期(平均5.86个月)。在Cobb角、ESR和Frankel Grade评分方面,组间存在显著差异。1例患者因糖尿病导致伤口愈合延迟。随访期间无内固定并发症,无结核复发。结论该方法结合抗结核化疗,具有脊柱结构保持270°的特点,是治疗胸腰椎结核的有效可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International surgery
International surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Surgery is the Official Journal of the International College of Surgeons. International Surgery has been published since 1938 and has an important position in the global scientific and medical publishing field. The Journal publishes only open access manuscripts. Advantages and benefits of open access publishing in International Surgery include: -worldwide internet transmission -prompt peer reviews -timely publishing following peer review approved manuscripts -even more timely worldwide transmissions of unedited peer review approved manuscripts (“online first”) prior to having copy edited manuscripts formally published. Non-approved peer reviewed manuscript authors have the opportunity to update and improve manuscripts prior to again submitting for peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信