Lights and shadows of new models in the health-care research: artificial intelligence's role in crafting healthcare research papers

Mirco CLEVA, Lorenzo ZULIANI, Antonio PINTO, Ennio BRUSCHI, Mariachiara CIRILLO, Massimo VALENTINO
{"title":"Lights and shadows of new models in the health-care research: artificial intelligence's role in crafting healthcare research papers","authors":"Mirco CLEVA, Lorenzo ZULIANI, Antonio PINTO, Ennio BRUSCHI, Mariachiara CIRILLO, Massimo VALENTINO","doi":"10.23736/s2723-9284.23.00260-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generative artificial intelligence (AI) refers to algorithms that can be used to produce new content, such as text, regulations, images, videos and audio. The background of generative AI in the field of scientific research and publication has significantly shifted with the appearance of generative large language models, such as ChatGPT. ChatGPT represents an AI language model that can produce text close to human writing, making it appropriate for tasks such as summarizing literature and producing statistical studies. The release of ChatGPT has made a substantial influence in the academic world and it has become comprehensible that such technology will notably impact the method of working of researchers. Since its beginning, ChatGPT has been mentioned in several preprints and published articles with authorship credits. This has spawned a large discussion about the function of AI tools in published literature and whether they need to be recognized as authors among journal editors, academics and publishers. Specific guidelines will support the correct use of generative AI, which may be able of future activities such as experiment design and peer review, and facilitate the distribution of important scientific information through publications avoiding any types of scientific misconduct.","PeriodicalId":369070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Review","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/s2723-9284.23.00260-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) refers to algorithms that can be used to produce new content, such as text, regulations, images, videos and audio. The background of generative AI in the field of scientific research and publication has significantly shifted with the appearance of generative large language models, such as ChatGPT. ChatGPT represents an AI language model that can produce text close to human writing, making it appropriate for tasks such as summarizing literature and producing statistical studies. The release of ChatGPT has made a substantial influence in the academic world and it has become comprehensible that such technology will notably impact the method of working of researchers. Since its beginning, ChatGPT has been mentioned in several preprints and published articles with authorship credits. This has spawned a large discussion about the function of AI tools in published literature and whether they need to be recognized as authors among journal editors, academics and publishers. Specific guidelines will support the correct use of generative AI, which may be able of future activities such as experiment design and peer review, and facilitate the distribution of important scientific information through publications avoiding any types of scientific misconduct.
医疗保健研究新模型的光影:人工智能在撰写医疗保健研究论文中的作用
生成式人工智能(AI)是指可用于生成文本、法规、图像、视频和音频等新内容的算法。随着ChatGPT等生成式大型语言模型的出现,生成式人工智能在科研和出版领域的背景发生了显著变化。ChatGPT代表了一种人工智能语言模型,它可以生成接近人类写作的文本,使其适合于总结文献和生成统计研究等任务。ChatGPT的发布在学术界产生了重大影响,可以理解的是,这种技术将显著影响研究人员的工作方法。从一开始,ChatGPT就在一些预印本和已发表的文章中被提及。这引发了一场关于人工智能工具在已发表文献中的功能以及是否需要被期刊编辑、学者和出版商认可为作者的大讨论。具体的指导方针将支持正确使用生成式人工智能,这可能有助于未来的活动,如实验设计和同行评审,并通过出版物促进重要科学信息的分发,避免任何类型的科学不端行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信